Warrior General Games

Originally posted by nano4288
Originally posted by just1idiot

You guys can have that rest, but I'll take our running game against anybody's.

Vikings: 2174.5 rushing yards
Maulers: 1688.5 rushing yards

Vikings: 271.8 yards/game
Maulers: 211.1 yards/game

Vikings: 8 fumbles (2 lost)
Maulers: 11 fumbles (2 lost)

Vikings: 28 TDs
Maulers: 18 TDs

Vikings: 449 pancakes
Maulers: 57 pancakes

The only stat where you beat us in rushing is in average, where we've got 5 yards/rush and you have 5.5 yards/rush. So please explain to me how you'll take your running game against anybody's?




So basically all that means is that we don't run the ball as much as you guys do, but if we did we would win?

YPC is the most important stat when it comes to a running game.

no idea how the vikings can run that much and pass that much in a single game rush 54 times pass 30 times... marauders throw 29 times and run 44 times maybe its because you guys have such a better defense then us but our backfield is still much better then yours Seemi dirt is way overrated watch out in the playoffs we only lost to the maulers because of turnovers (1 because of me) 3 to 0 no idea how a CB can cause a fumble on me unless he is really strong and has good tackling or set on power

Originally posted by NewYork Giants
no idea how the vikings can run that much and pass that much in a single game rush 54 times pass 30 times... marauders throw 29 times and run 44 times maybe its because you guys have such a better defense then us but our backfield is still much better then yours Seemi dirt is way overrated watch out in the playoffs we only lost to the maulers because of turnovers (1 because of me) 3 to 0 no idea how a CB can cause a fumble on me unless he is really strong and has good tackling or set on power

Or maybe your RB is over-rated ;-)

Originally posted by just1idiot

The Patriots and the Giants aren't the result of code written by some programmer in Oregon (I don't think?!?!?!)


No, the methods of rigging that game were far more complicated!

Originally posted by Exar0s

Indeed, I can't even sleep right now.I will be crunching numbers and watching replays all night after the games.Here is to a great playoff eh?

Cheers!

Originally posted by nano4288
Originally posted by just1idiot


The Patriots and the Giants aren't the result of code written by some programmer in Oregon (I don't think?!?!?!)


No, the methods of rigging that game were far more complicated!

Lol! Awesome.

Originally posted by nano4288
Originally posted by just1idiot


The Patriots and the Giants aren't the result of code written by some programmer in Oregon (I don't think?!?!?!)


No, the methods of rigging that game were far more complicated!

yea Brady getting his ass pounded looked very rigged!

I would argue to say it was superior game planing...just like in GLB, how do you beat a team better than you with better players....Game Plan, Game Plan, Game Plan!!!

Originally posted by NewYork Giants
no idea how the vikings can run that much and pass that much in a single game rush 54 times pass 30 times... marauders throw 29 times and run 44 times maybe its because you guys have such a better defense then us but our backfield is still much better then yours Seemi dirt is way overrated watch out in the playoffs we only lost to the maulers because of turnovers (1 because of me) 3 to 0 no idea how a CB can cause a fumble on me unless he is really strong and has good tackling or set on power

Haha, I'm overrated? Why's that? Because I'm not the typical RB? I'm slow, and can run you over? I guess we'll see if we meet in the playoffs, I'm lookin forward to this!!

Haha, I guess Jerome Bettis, Jim Brown, Ottis Ansderson, Chris Okoye, and LArry Csonka were all overrated to. But thats okay.

Its funny he of all people says you're overrated... in our game you rushed for 93.5 to his 67.5. Had 2 TDs to his 0. Had 5 broken tackles to his 0. And only had only 6% smaller average.

Yeah, I was just trying to pimp my guys, but seriously, that Dirt dude didn't have a single bad game, his worst was 73.5 yds (4.2 a carry) and 1 touchdown:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_game_log.pl?player_id=125704

That guy is welcome on my team anytime.

Originally posted by NewYork Giants
no idea how the vikings can run that much and pass that much in a single game rush 54 times pass 30 times... marauders throw 29 times and run 44 times maybe its because you guys have such a better defense then us but our backfield is still much better then yours Seemi dirt is way overrated watch out in the playoffs we only lost to the maulers because of turnovers (1 because of me) 3 to 0 no idea how a CB can cause a fumble on me unless he is really strong and has good tackling or set on power

Dude, get that weak stuff out of here.

Just take you loss like a man and give credit where it is due.If Seemi is "overrated" than you just flat out suck (Statistically speaking of course).

And no, I will not "watch out" in the playoffs.If you manage to get to the conference game then I will give you a little attention.You should worry less about us and more about the ROUGHRIDERS and Sundowners.

omg i am tired of this shit i keep typing stuff and then when ever i try to open a new page its gone... hold on ill post my reply again... soon
____________________________________________________________________________________

ok geez our running game is not based on 1 person its based on all our HBs and our FBs they get alot carries also since seemi gets about half and i get 1/4 of our carries if you checked our games you would see by the way our team has 3 less TDS for like 80 less rushes and i have 7 less TDS for 70 less rushes im not saying seemi is bad but he is not as good as his stats show btw im pretty sure the vikins will make it to the finals vs either us or sundowners Seemi also had a huge game with a 66 yard td 243 Yards 6 TDS and YPC of 12 thats like 1/5 of his total rushing yards and 1/3 of his TDS thanks to that really huge game his stats are that great still give vikings props however they managed to throw and pass that much in a single game... still trying to figure that out i still have somethings in mind but i forgot that i mentioned in my other posts...

Originally posted by NewYork Giants
omg i am tired of this shit i keep typing stuff and then when ever i try to open a new page its gone... hold on ill post my reply again... soon

Oh.. okay?

Originally posted by nano4288
Originally posted by just1idiot

small sample size, but it's a lot closer to accuracy than just grabbing total stats.


Actually I'd argue that a larger sample size with the potential for low criterion validity is a better measure than a case study.

i second that motion.

Originally posted by NewYork Giants
omg i am tired of this shit i keep typing stuff and then when ever i try to open a new page its gone... hold on ill post my reply again... soon
____________________________________________________________________________________

ok geez our running game is not based on 1 person its based on all our HBs and our FBs they get alot carries also since seemi gets about half and i get 1/4 of our carries if you checked our games you would see by the way our team has 3 less TDS for like 80 less rushes and i have 7 less TDS for 70 less rushes im not saying seemi is bad but he is not as good as his stats show btw im pretty sure the vikins will make it to the finals vs either us or sundowners Seemi also had a huge game with a 66 yard td 243 Yards 6 TDS and YPC of 12 thats like 1/5 of his total rushing yards and 1/3 of his TDS thanks to that really huge game his stats are that great still give vikings props however they managed to throw and pass that much in a single game... still trying to figure that out i still have somethings in mind but i forgot that i mentioned in my other posts...

the more touches you get, the LOWER your overall stats tend to go. except for total yards and TDs.