Very nice, although I'm not too bothered as long as we get into the playoffs, which we have 
JimForce
offline
offline
Looks weird now,.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Updated for week 16.
Originally posted by liltman53
Looks weird now,.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
The difference between the Beavers D and the Legends D was a lot bigger than the difference between their offenses. Thats why they were higher overall.
Currently the overall formula is comprised of 1/3 offense, 1/3 defense, and 1/3 special teams. I was thinking about scaling them a little differently though.
Originally posted by liltman53
Looks weird now,.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
The difference between the Beavers D and the Legends D was a lot bigger than the difference between their offenses. Thats why they were higher overall.
Currently the overall formula is comprised of 1/3 offense, 1/3 defense, and 1/3 special teams. I was thinking about scaling them a little differently though.
Last edited Jul 13, 2008 17:11:47
Awoody251
offline
offline
Originally posted by GarrettFoster
Updated for week 16.
Originally posted by liltman53
Looks weird now,.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
The difference between the Beavers D and the Legends D was a lot bigger than the difference between their offenses. Thats why they were higher overall.
Currently the overall formula is comprised of 1/3 offense, 1/3 defense, and 1/3 special teams. I was thinking about scaling them a little differently though.
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
Updated for week 16.
Originally posted by liltman53
Looks weird now,.
Beavers are better than the legends in every stat except run defense and kicking...
Less points allowed, more points for ...
Oh well. Just a formula.
The difference between the Beavers D and the Legends D was a lot bigger than the difference between their offenses. Thats why they were higher overall.
Currently the overall formula is comprised of 1/3 offense, 1/3 defense, and 1/3 special teams. I was thinking about scaling them a little differently though.
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
Nicely done. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I dont know if your spreadsheet is broken into individual games or just a season total. If its individual games, it would be interesting to see how the rankings shake loose just using the last 8 games. Sort of an end of season momentum thing.
Crunch
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Originally posted by Awoody251
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
Thank you for the input it is very welcome. I would like to get this working well before the next season starts.
Points for and points against are 1/3 of the the offensive and defensive rankings, which are then part of the overall rankings. So they make up a small portion, 2/9ths to be exact, of the overall score already. I am open to other ratios, but I think this is a fair weighting. I am including a breakdown of the overall score below.
Overall Score
1) 1/3 of the Offensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Off Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Off Passing Value
...c) 1/3 Points For x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
2) 1/3 of the Defensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Def Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Def Passing value
...c) 1/3 Points Against x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
3) 1/3 of the Special teams overall value
...a) 1/3 Return value
...b) 1/3 Kicking value
...c) 1/3 Punting value
keep in mind that overall value and overall rank are different. Rank is the number you see on the first page. The values are typically in the thousands.
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
Nicely done. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I dont know if your spreadsheet is broken into individual games or just a season total. If its individual games, it would be interesting to see how the rankings shake loose just using the last 8 games. Sort of an end of season momentum thing.
Crunch
The spreadsheet is cumulative, meaning all games up to that point. It wouldn't be hard to make it weekly instead.
And as for the last 8 games I would love to do it. The only problem is I do not have any of the stats from those games.
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
Thank you for the input it is very welcome. I would like to get this working well before the next season starts.
Points for and points against are 1/3 of the the offensive and defensive rankings, which are then part of the overall rankings. So they make up a small portion, 2/9ths to be exact, of the overall score already. I am open to other ratios, but I think this is a fair weighting. I am including a breakdown of the overall score below.
Overall Score
1) 1/3 of the Offensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Off Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Off Passing Value
...c) 1/3 Points For x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
2) 1/3 of the Defensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Def Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Def Passing value
...c) 1/3 Points Against x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
3) 1/3 of the Special teams overall value
...a) 1/3 Return value
...b) 1/3 Kicking value
...c) 1/3 Punting value
keep in mind that overall value and overall rank are different. Rank is the number you see on the first page. The values are typically in the thousands.
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
Nicely done. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I dont know if your spreadsheet is broken into individual games or just a season total. If its individual games, it would be interesting to see how the rankings shake loose just using the last 8 games. Sort of an end of season momentum thing.
Crunch
The spreadsheet is cumulative, meaning all games up to that point. It wouldn't be hard to make it weekly instead.
And as for the last 8 games I would love to do it. The only problem is I do not have any of the stats from those games.
Last edited Jul 14, 2008 15:57:08
Awoody251
offline
offline
Originally posted by GarrettFoster
Originally posted by Awoody251
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
Thank you for the input it is very welcome. I would like to get this working well before the next season starts.
Points for and points against are 1/3 of the the offensive and defensive rankings, which are then part of the overall rankings. So they make up a small portion, 2/9ths to be exact, of the overall score already. I am open to other ratios, but I think this is a fair weighting. I am including a breakdown of the overall score below.
Overall Score
1) 1/3 of the Offensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Off Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Off Passing Value
...c) 1/3 Points For x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
2) 1/3 of the Defensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Def Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Def Passing value
...c) 1/3 Points Against x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
3) 1/3 of the Special teams overall value
...a) 1/3 Return value
...b) 1/3 Kicking value
...c) 1/3 Punting value
keep in mind that overall value and overall rank are different. Rank is the number you see on the first page. The values are typically in the thousands.
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
Nicely done. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I dont know if your spreadsheet is broken into individual games or just a season total. If its individual games, it would be interesting to see how the rankings shake loose just using the last 8 games. Sort of an end of season momentum thing.
Crunch
The spreadsheet is cumulative, meaning all games up to that point. It wouldn't be hard to make it weekly instead.
And as for the last 8 games I would love to do it. The only problem is I do not have any of the stats from those games.
And thats why you are doing this instead of me. Thank you kind sir for doing this.
Originally posted by Awoody251
I would think points for and against should have some influence as well.
Thank you for the input it is very welcome. I would like to get this working well before the next season starts.
Points for and points against are 1/3 of the the offensive and defensive rankings, which are then part of the overall rankings. So they make up a small portion, 2/9ths to be exact, of the overall score already. I am open to other ratios, but I think this is a fair weighting. I am including a breakdown of the overall score below.
Overall Score
1) 1/3 of the Offensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Off Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Off Passing Value
...c) 1/3 Points For x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
2) 1/3 of the Defensive overall value
...a) 1/3 Def Rushing value
...b) 1/3 Def Passing value
...c) 1/3 Points Against x 10 (this is done so that it is the proper scale)
3) 1/3 of the Special teams overall value
...a) 1/3 Return value
...b) 1/3 Kicking value
...c) 1/3 Punting value
keep in mind that overall value and overall rank are different. Rank is the number you see on the first page. The values are typically in the thousands.
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
Nicely done. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I dont know if your spreadsheet is broken into individual games or just a season total. If its individual games, it would be interesting to see how the rankings shake loose just using the last 8 games. Sort of an end of season momentum thing.
Crunch
The spreadsheet is cumulative, meaning all games up to that point. It wouldn't be hard to make it weekly instead.
And as for the last 8 games I would love to do it. The only problem is I do not have any of the stats from those games.
And thats why you are doing this instead of me. Thank you kind sir for doing this.
JovialEvil
offline
offline
Why is Gabon's Passing Ranking so low when we have the 2nd most passing yards in the division, 1st in our conference.
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Originally posted by JovialEvil
Why is Gabon's Passing Ranking so low when we have the 2nd most passing yards in the division, 1st in our conference.
That would be because the teams in front of you have far more passing touchdowns.
Why is Gabon's Passing Ranking so low when we have the 2nd most passing yards in the division, 1st in our conference.
That would be because the teams in front of you have far more passing touchdowns.
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Updated for the playoff teams. Note that it only includes the one playoff game in the calculations.
danpenc918
offline
offline
How did we (Frogs) leapfrog over the Fear?
We go from being a 2nd tier team to the top of the conference.
We go from being a 2nd tier team to the top of the conference.
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
Little problem on the playoff section, the Thunderlizards (unfortunately) didnt make the playoffs. The stats and score doesnt reflect the scrim game for the TL, so Im guessing that the team name is wrong.
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
Little problem on the playoff section, the Thunderlizards (unfortunately) didnt make the playoffs. The stats and score doesnt reflect the scrim game for the TL, so Im guessing that the team name is wrong.
Sorry bout that. It is fixed.
Little problem on the playoff section, the Thunderlizards (unfortunately) didnt make the playoffs. The stats and score doesnt reflect the scrim game for the TL, so Im guessing that the team name is wrong.
Sorry bout that. It is fixed.
GarrettFoster
offline
offline
Updated for 2nd set of playoff games. Remember that it is only taking into account the stats you are putting up in the playoffs.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
