Outlaw Total Team Sacks 34
Fuzzy Slippers Total Sacks 33
MVP is player not team based.
Fuzzy Slippers Total Sacks 33
MVP is player not team based.
Take away the 16 sacks he has against those two shit teams in the East and he is a solid DE. But I think I would pick someone else as MVP.
My vote would go to either Joe Kstrap or Soaren Hightower. Kstrap leads the league in rushing and rushing TD's. Soaren is just the best QB in the league. His team is undefeated and he has the highest QB rating among the top 10 QB is the league.
Fat Banana
offline
offline
Originally posted by IHasUsername
Tackles show good play reading. 13 INTs (10 without SPO/KIN) show shutdown.
Pretty good. Leen Ween has 14 (12 without SPO/KIN)
Tackles show good play reading. 13 INTs (10 without SPO/KIN) show shutdown.
Pretty good. Leen Ween has 14 (12 without SPO/KIN)
Last edited Jul 10, 2008 13:00:19
xTrav
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by IHasUsername
Tackles show good play reading. 13 INTs (10 without SPO/KIN) show shutdown.
Pretty good. Leen Ween has 14 (12 without SPO/KIN)
Leen 'The Interception Machine' Ween
Originally posted by IHasUsername
Tackles show good play reading. 13 INTs (10 without SPO/KIN) show shutdown.
Pretty good. Leen Ween has 14 (12 without SPO/KIN)
Leen 'The Interception Machine' Ween
Doomsday
offline
offline
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
MrEmerkin
offline
offline
Originally posted by Doomsday
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
Well, when you look at total TD's allowed, Bakers and Campbell have 48, Rant/Donalt have allowed 98.
There is SUCK ... and there is REAL SUCK.
I'll let you do the math.
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
Well, when you look at total TD's allowed, Bakers and Campbell have 48, Rant/Donalt have allowed 98.
There is SUCK ... and there is REAL SUCK.
I'll let you do the math.
Doomsday
offline
offline
Originally posted by MrEmerkin
Originally posted by Doomsday
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
Well, when you look at total TD's allowed, Bakers and Campbell have 48, Rant/Donalt have allowed 98.
There is SUCK ... and there is REAL SUCK.
I'll let you do the math.
If you wipe out 2 teams from the east, then each team in the west will have played two more games during the course of the season. This would give whatever chance the east had to make positive MVP progress in two games obsolete, no matter what teams they were to play.
I'm from the west but I'm just trying to be fair here. I'm sure there are other ways to even this out that I'm just not thinking of atm but taking away 2 games from the entire east definitely puts them at a disadvantage for the MVP pick...
The only thing I could come up with is minus the games against FT. Campbell and Off Topic as well as King and Sportsrant but even this might not work out since I think there are inter-conference games against all 4 of these teams.
Now you do the math. =]
Originally posted by Doomsday
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
So the MVP has to come from the West?
Well. we could also not count the games played against Ft. Campbell and Off Topic. Then the east and west can have a more even outcome for MVP.
Well, when you look at total TD's allowed, Bakers and Campbell have 48, Rant/Donalt have allowed 98.
There is SUCK ... and there is REAL SUCK.
I'll let you do the math.
If you wipe out 2 teams from the east, then each team in the west will have played two more games during the course of the season. This would give whatever chance the east had to make positive MVP progress in two games obsolete, no matter what teams they were to play.
I'm from the west but I'm just trying to be fair here. I'm sure there are other ways to even this out that I'm just not thinking of atm but taking away 2 games from the entire east definitely puts them at a disadvantage for the MVP pick...
The only thing I could come up with is minus the games against FT. Campbell and Off Topic as well as King and Sportsrant but even this might not work out since I think there are inter-conference games against all 4 of these teams.
Now you do the math. =]
Last edited Jul 10, 2008 17:59:28
MrEmerkin
offline
offline
Originally posted by
Now you do the math. =]
Nah. You just look at the competitors, and subtract any stats from any games vs their three worst opponents. That eliminates the really suck teams, and any lucky draw of a suck opponent in the inter-conference game.
Now you do the math. =]
Nah. You just look at the competitors, and subtract any stats from any games vs their three worst opponents. That eliminates the really suck teams, and any lucky draw of a suck opponent in the inter-conference game.
xTrav
offline
offline
You guys fail. There is no 'wiping out' of teams to try and compensate for your players lack of performance. Kobe Bryant ripped thru the league and won MVP last year while playing 'creampuff teams'. Then he got into the Finals and did not put up MVP type of numbers against a real team. He failed miserably. Dont be another Kobe.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
