Warrior General Games

Biased in what way?

FYI, Rocco was averaging 38.1 to Billy's 37.9 before last game. That's why I'm holding my votes until after Game 16 is played. Billy might keep up his average, but he might not. I can't vote for Rocco anyway.

Don't get me wrong...I appreciate the votes for Dublin's players. It's just my personal opinion that someone else might deserve them more after the next 3 games are played.

Originally posted by derek1222
Agreed to both Cedo and AnotherLawyer. However, this is an obviously biased thread.

who is the thread biased towards or against?

I have posted something to advance a little, but i said that's temporary vote

Originally posted by Menamino
Rules are simple:

- No voting for players on your own team, that's it

I'd add "no bigging up players on your own team" as well. I understand why people do it, I want to do it with some of our guys, but really, it's more interesting to see if anyone spots a standout player who isn't in one of the big three.

Sorry if I broke an unwritten rule, but I really like to have other coaches mention anybody on their team that they find deserving of merit. I think it helps me to make educated votes. Other owners have admitted in this thread that by the end they tend to get lazy. In other leagues I have been in touting your players was part of the voting process. Saying "hey look at my halfback" isn't going to get somebody with a 2.3 yard average put on the team.

Originally posted by Blutoski
Sorry if I broke an unwritten rule, but I really like to have other coaches mention anybody on their team that they find deserving of merit. I think it helps me to make educated votes. Other owners have admitted in this thread that by the end they tend to get lazy. In other leagues I have been in touting your players was part of the voting process. Saying "hey look at my halfback" isn't going to get somebody with a 2.3 yard average put on the team.

I don't think I'd go so far as to apologise if I were you. But does a barrier exist to stop it degrading to: "Hey, you voted <Team A's Player> but the guy playing on my team is better"?

I personally don't have any problem with players being promoted in this thread because in the end although I may have gotten lazy toward the end I still am going to vote for who I am going to vote for. Quite frankly I have promoted Stockholm Syndrome as the team to watch out for this season and have been dead on. Blutoski has a player on my team and owns the Stockholm Syndrome so it makes it interesting during the week we play them because not only does he own a team he owns a team in the same conference. Too make it more interesting I own a player on Toulouse Aviators but we are not in the same conference. I also own a team in South America Pro where Cobra Kai does all the bragging and makes it interesting along with owning teams in Oceania Pro and USA A #2.

I am only very active in this league because I find it very competitive. I do frequent the South America Pro board but don't post in there just because of the fact mentioned above. I use to spend a lot of time on this and found out it consumed a lot of my time and I really needed to focus on running my businesses in real life so cut back a lot on my time and since I did I focused all my energies when in here on Western Europe because of the competitiveness.

Anyone back on track to the original post Blutoski deserves a lot of credit for his team and players but in my honest opinion the players I thought were good enough to make it on All Zeta Team where very close and if there was a second team they would for sure be on there.

Originally posted by Ampersand
Originally posted by Blutoski

Sorry if I broke an unwritten rule, but I really like to have other coaches mention anybody on their team that they find deserving of merit. I think it helps me to make educated votes. Other owners have admitted in this thread that by the end they tend to get lazy. In other leagues I have been in touting your players was part of the voting process. Saying "hey look at my halfback" isn't going to get somebody with a 2.3 yard average put on the team.

I don't think I'd go so far as to apologise if I were you. But does a barrier exist to stop it degrading to: "Hey, you voted <Team A's Player> but the guy playing on my team is better"?

Definitely, my point isn't hey my players are better, my point is my players are good. Are they good enough for All-Zeta. Maybe? Maybe not? That's your call. I wouldn't put down any other players or any voters. I think Myneondeon has been incredible this year. I look at every boxscore and I see another interception, butI know he's not the only CB having a great year.

Drachir--thanks for your support this season. It does look like our head to head game may be big for both teams.

Don't get me wrong. I wasn't singling anyone out but rather meant my point in general.

Just throwing out Dealin Pain(SS) as the hopeful representative of the ill-fated Nuremberg Nightknights.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=64312

Originally posted by Blutoski
Originally posted by Ampersand

Originally posted by Blutoski


Sorry if I broke an unwritten rule, but I really like to have other coaches mention anybody on their team that they find deserving of merit. I think it helps me to make educated votes. Other owners have admitted in this thread that by the end they tend to get lazy. In other leagues I have been in touting your players was part of the voting process. Saying "hey look at my halfback" isn't going to get somebody with a 2.3 yard average put on the team.

I don't think I'd go so far as to apologise if I were you. But does a barrier exist to stop it degrading to: "Hey, you voted <Team A's Player> but the guy playing on my team is better"?

Definitely, my point isn't hey my players are better, my point is my players are good. Are they good enough for All-Zeta. Maybe? Maybe not? That's your call. I wouldn't put down any other players or any voters. I think Myneondeon has been incredible this year. I look at every boxscore and I see another interception, butI know he's not the only CB having a great year.

Drachir--thanks for your support this season. It does look like our head to head game may be big for both teams.
I think the game may be bigger for Stockholm than us. It looks like we are locked into the #2 seed but you have a possibility of moving up and getting a home playoff game. Since you know LouDawg, Demarcus and moh are very competitive there is the only chance of giving our best. I won't be upset at all if Stockholm wins tomorrow but at the same time certainly wouldn't expect to throw the game.

If I was Inverness and we got bumped out of hosting a playoff game because one team threw the game, I'd be outraged. Hopefully, our lads rise up to the challenge, but either way we hope to get your best game.

Originally posted by Blutoski
If I was Inverness and we got bumped out of hosting a playoff game because one team threw the game, I'd be outraged. Hopefully, our lads rise up to the challenge, but either way we hope to get your best game.

Definitely as much as we want the home game, it wouldn't be right doing it that way. Besides we got too much faith in our boys and their ability to play 95-0 on energy status

Originally posted by Snowpork
Just throwing out Dealin Pain(SS) as the hopeful representative of the ill-fated Nuremberg Nightknights.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=64312

He had a good game today, 24(!) tackles; http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=42315

Of course, most of them were downfield, which inflated his numbers a bit, but he was still fast, agile, and a sure tackler. He looks pretty good to me.

My god, that guy has more tackles in one game than my CB has in an entire season