Originally posted by Cybertron
Is Apes the team with the all rushing offense?
Yes they are.
Is Apes the team with the all rushing offense?
Yes they are.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > S55 Vet Discussion (so we do tick off Xars)
Originally posted by Raid
One thing for sure, chamrs too high.
Man, invoking that CPL, sombrero and everything.
RIP
One thing for sure, chamrs too high.
Man, invoking that CPL, sombrero and everything.
RIP
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Man, invoking that CPL, sombrero and everything.
RIP
CPL was a lot of fun.
Man, invoking that CPL, sombrero and everything.
RIP
CPL was a lot of fun.
Raid
offline
offline
Seriously though, teams need to stop doing this whole 'rock paper scissors' thing.
Wolflions Pummel Lex
Lex Smacks Reb
Rebs Smash Apes
Apes Clock BS&B
BS&B Whomps Chamrs
Chamrs Bonk Crowns
Crowns Lampoon Mix
Mix Beat Reb
Reb Toss Wolflions
It's just too much going around.
Wolflions Pummel Lex
Lex Smacks Reb
Rebs Smash Apes
Apes Clock BS&B
BS&B Whomps Chamrs
Chamrs Bonk Crowns
Crowns Lampoon Mix
Mix Beat Reb
Reb Toss Wolflions
It's just too much going around.
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 18:51:05
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 18:50:35
Cybertron
offline
offline
Originally posted by Raid
CPL was a lot of fun.
WTF? You haven't changed your icon in years.
CPL was a lot of fun.
WTF? You haven't changed your icon in years.
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cybertron
WTF? You haven't changed your icon in years.
Yeah, has been a while.
WTF? You haven't changed your icon in years.
Yeah, has been a while.
eTHICCalBEEF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Raid
Yeah, has been a while.
Wait, which of the two is really you? I'll admit, when I heard agerm talk on stream he sounded nothing like Bill Belichick, which was strange...
Yeah, has been a while.
Wait, which of the two is really you? I'll admit, when I heard agerm talk on stream he sounded nothing like Bill Belichick, which was strange...
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kvothe27
Wait, which of the two is really you? I'll admit, when I heard agerm talk on stream he sounded nothing like Bill Belichick, which was strange...
I'm an AI, created to give responses to your queries in a way which would convince you that the world you live in is real, just like everyone else.
Wait, which of the two is really you? I'll admit, when I heard agerm talk on stream he sounded nothing like Bill Belichick, which was strange...
I'm an AI, created to give responses to your queries in a way which would convince you that the world you live in is real, just like everyone else.
eTHICCalBEEF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Raid
I'm an AI, created to give responses to your queries in a way which would convince you that the world you live in is real, just like everyone else.
No. If that was true, you wouldn't have published that Harvard study about how the universe is almost certainly a simulation, created the Matrix or the Truman Show to sow doubt in my mind, or said what you just said. If your goal was to convince me this is real you would have made it impossible to think otherwise. Thus, your actual goal is clearly not to convince me the world is real, but rather to convince me the world is fake.
I'm an AI, created to give responses to your queries in a way which would convince you that the world you live in is real, just like everyone else.
No. If that was true, you wouldn't have published that Harvard study about how the universe is almost certainly a simulation, created the Matrix or the Truman Show to sow doubt in my mind, or said what you just said. If your goal was to convince me this is real you would have made it impossible to think otherwise. Thus, your actual goal is clearly not to convince me the world is real, but rather to convince me the world is fake.
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kvothe27
No. If that was true, you wouldn't have published that Harvard study about how the universe is almost certainly a simulation, created the Matrix or the Truman Show to sow doubt in my mind, or said what you just said. If your goal was to convince me this is real you would have made it impossible to think otherwise. Thus, your actual goal is clearly not to convince me the world is real, but rather to convince me the world is fake.
That paper is often misconstrued, most popularly by Elon and Tyson.
Essentially what it says is that:
IF a society had the ability to simulate to an extent that people couldn't recognize the difference - big if,
IF that simulation was powerful enough to create multiple layers of simulation within itself and was sticking people into simulations within the simulation - bigger if
IF that society was also powerful enough to dominate the entire galaxy - massive if
And If that society had some reason to be sticking people into the simulation, and again the people in the simulations had a reason to stick others into their simulations and so on and so on - supermassive If.
And IF those layered societies didn't lose interest in sticking everyone in simulations that can have multiple layers within them. - maybe they have enough? Lots of time and man hours involved probably. Maybe one layer decides to prevent people inside theirs from simulating other universes within it?
That once you get a bunch of simulations layered on top of eachother, then the chances of being in the prime universe are not likely.
Which means, that if all the stars align and there ARE perchance overlords who control the universe and have sufficient technology that it's highly unlikely that we would not be living in a simulation... which is assuming a crap ton, or even that they would have a reason to stick you in a simulation. It was a thought experiment more than anything.
But yes, you are in a simulation.
No. If that was true, you wouldn't have published that Harvard study about how the universe is almost certainly a simulation, created the Matrix or the Truman Show to sow doubt in my mind, or said what you just said. If your goal was to convince me this is real you would have made it impossible to think otherwise. Thus, your actual goal is clearly not to convince me the world is real, but rather to convince me the world is fake.
That paper is often misconstrued, most popularly by Elon and Tyson.
Essentially what it says is that:
IF a society had the ability to simulate to an extent that people couldn't recognize the difference - big if,
IF that simulation was powerful enough to create multiple layers of simulation within itself and was sticking people into simulations within the simulation - bigger if
IF that society was also powerful enough to dominate the entire galaxy - massive if
And If that society had some reason to be sticking people into the simulation, and again the people in the simulations had a reason to stick others into their simulations and so on and so on - supermassive If.
And IF those layered societies didn't lose interest in sticking everyone in simulations that can have multiple layers within them. - maybe they have enough? Lots of time and man hours involved probably. Maybe one layer decides to prevent people inside theirs from simulating other universes within it?
That once you get a bunch of simulations layered on top of eachother, then the chances of being in the prime universe are not likely.
Which means, that if all the stars align and there ARE perchance overlords who control the universe and have sufficient technology that it's highly unlikely that we would not be living in a simulation... which is assuming a crap ton, or even that they would have a reason to stick you in a simulation. It was a thought experiment more than anything.
But yes, you are in a simulation.
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 22:49:29
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 22:47:47
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 22:46:30
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 22:39:40
Edited by Raid on Jun 11, 2021 22:35:20
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
