Edited by DallasCowboyFan on Jan 25, 2019 23:34:37
Forum > Teams Looking For Players > S37 Rookie team loaded with superstars. Looking for defensive players.
DallasCowboyFan
offline
offline
makaw
offline
offline
Frig it, disregard the last post. Full steam ahead with the Ransom!
GLB classic is to slow with fans every other day.
GLB classic is to slow with fans every other day.
makaw
offline
offline
Originally posted by atlbruce
Okay, now tell me all about the 5 LBs and 4 DEs.
Not actual roster plan, just noted down some openings.
Okay, now tell me all about the 5 LBs and 4 DEs.
Not actual roster plan, just noted down some openings.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Detroit Leos
3WRs can work depending on scheme and player builds. BSB ran with 3WRs our last 1 or two rookie-vet runs and we did alright.
ya id say it works ok
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/roster/3392
3WRs can work depending on scheme and player builds. BSB ran with 3WRs our last 1 or two rookie-vet runs and we did alright.
ya id say it works ok
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/roster/3392
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
As far as WRs I am always targeting my S* or S*s if I have two, or the S*TE. What's the point of even having 3WRs if you never throw to them?
May as well have some cheap specialists you can stash on STs.
May as well have some cheap specialists you can stash on STs.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by atlbruce
That's...a whole lot of O-line there. Rather thin at LB and CB, though.
Outside of the starting oline guys the rest are just there to keep the salary cap restriction. But I could easily see using 5 LB's and 4 DE's with some specialization and no superstars.
And yes, I have too few CB's which puts me at sort of a disadvantage playing a team like Logzilla but its fun having so many superstars though.
That's...a whole lot of O-line there. Rather thin at LB and CB, though.
Outside of the starting oline guys the rest are just there to keep the salary cap restriction. But I could easily see using 5 LB's and 4 DE's with some specialization and no superstars.
And yes, I have too few CB's which puts me at sort of a disadvantage playing a team like Logzilla but its fun having so many superstars though.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
As far as WRs I am always targeting my S* or S*s if I have two, or the S*TE. What's the point of even having 3WRs if you never throw to them?
May as well have some cheap specialists you can stash on STs.
Running more 3/4 wr sets of course.
As far as WRs I am always targeting my S* or S*s if I have two, or the S*TE. What's the point of even having 3WRs if you never throw to them?
May as well have some cheap specialists you can stash on STs.
Running more 3/4 wr sets of course.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Running more 3/4 wr sets of course.
You don't call plays for your S*s in those sets? I know exactly where I want to go on every pass play and it is to a S*. If I have the slower BTE in then that increases the chance my S*s are targeted as well.
Running more 3/4 wr sets of course.
You don't call plays for your S*s in those sets? I know exactly where I want to go on every pass play and it is to a S*. If I have the slower BTE in then that increases the chance my S*s are targeted as well.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
Your third WR is averaging 4 targets a game, 3 in the last 12. I mean if your an all pass team then it would be a bit different. My S*TE performed just fine out of the 4WR set, probably better than a non-S*WR.
Put your TE and BTE in on the strong side on 4WR sets and your WRs to the weak side and you get superior strong side blocking and great weak side receiving.
It's not so bad when it is your personal WR not being used but if it is an agent's WR they start chirping at you.
Put your TE and BTE in on the strong side on 4WR sets and your WRs to the weak side and you get superior strong side blocking and great weak side receiving.
It's not so bad when it is your personal WR not being used but if it is an agent's WR they start chirping at you.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
Your third WR is averaging 4 targets a game, 3 in the last 12. I mean if your an all pass team then it would be a bit different. My S*TE performed just fine out of the 4WR set, probably better than a non-S*WR.
Put your TE and BTE in on the strong side on 4WR sets and your WRs to the weak side and you get superior strong side blocking and great weak side receiving.
It's not so bad when it is your personal WR not being used but if it is an agent's WR they start chirping at you.
We arent an all pass team. However i dont want to use anything but a WR in the wr spot. The only other option would be the CPU TE.
Your third WR is averaging 4 targets a game, 3 in the last 12. I mean if your an all pass team then it would be a bit different. My S*TE performed just fine out of the 4WR set, probably better than a non-S*WR.
Put your TE and BTE in on the strong side on 4WR sets and your WRs to the weak side and you get superior strong side blocking and great weak side receiving.
It's not so bad when it is your personal WR not being used but if it is an agent's WR they start chirping at you.
We arent an all pass team. However i dont want to use anything but a WR in the wr spot. The only other option would be the CPU TE.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
