Originally posted by TxSteve
I've always been a huge fan of consistency. Capped it - but not too high (50s I think)
I always thought it reduced the variance of rolls...in pressure situations it increased the lower end of the roll possibilities (if that makes sense)
but that is just my own guess - certainly no way to prove it.
I do think it is very important though.
I have heard that too, that people think it raises roll floors similar to SAs like Mr Reliable, do remember where that came from originally?
I've always been a huge fan of consistency. Capped it - but not too high (50s I think)
I always thought it reduced the variance of rolls...in pressure situations it increased the lower end of the roll possibilities (if that makes sense)
but that is just my own guess - certainly no way to prove it.
I do think it is very important though.
I have heard that too, that people think it raises roll floors similar to SAs like Mr Reliable, do remember where that came from originally?
