Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Spread-em offense
Haters gonna hate


I'm not going to rain on your GLB1 thread. So I'll do it here. There are two major reasons why I could no longer play GLB1. The first was the extremely long training time for you're player to be relevant. Having to basically just focus on 1 attribute at a time was boring and required a large of micromanaging. That's not including the luck factor when it comes to rolling the best equipment. The second was the absolute control over tactics, which also required tedious micromanaging. The smallest mistake could be fatal, and it's annoying watching teams constantly running the ball four times for a first down when you know they should be logically punting in that 4th and 2 situation.

GLB2 offers some semblance of immediate impact of your builds. Also doesn't require ungodly amounts of scouting and tactics setting, basically there is much less micromanaging in GLB2. Granted people can still spend hours scouting and setting tactics in GLB2 but it's really not as common and once again not really required at all

Originally posted by TehKyou
I'm not going to rain on your GLB1 thread. So I'll do it here. There are two major reasons why I could no longer play GLB1. The first was the extremely long training time for you're player to be relevant. Having to basically just focus on 1 attribute at a time was boring and required a large of micromanaging. That's not including the luck factor when it comes to rolling the best equipment. The second was the absolute control over tactics, which also required tedious micromanaging. The smallest mistake could be fatal, and it's annoying watching teams constantly running the ball four times for a first down when you know they should be logically punting in that 4th and 2 situation.

GLB2 offers some semblance of immediate impact of your builds. Also doesn't require ungodly amounts of scouting and tactics setting, basically there is much less micromanaging in GLB2. Granted people can still spend hours scouting and setting tactics in GLB2 but it's really not as common and once again not really required at all

so what you are saying is that you were lazy and didn't know what you were doing?
ok, got it

Cool story bro. Resort to that name calling because you have no logical rebuttle

What was it, like a year and 2 months to fully level a player in that game?

Originally posted by TehKyou
Cool story bro. Resort to that name calling because you have no logical rebuttle

What was it, like a year and 2 months to fully level a player in that game?

show me name calling bro. Not sure that lazy is name calling but whatever.
I have been playing GLB since 2008. Not sure that I have ever heard of you over there. Must be why you ran over here was because you were as bad at GLB as you are at posting

and yes, the development of a player is longer, but that is part of it. Having the patience and the plan to stick with to get that player to where he will be at his most productive.

The thread This is for GLB2 only guys has been merged into this thread

You guys should come try out the original GLB.
Much more fun if you are a coordinator type.
Great game that funded the development of GLB2.

If you have never tried it out, please come see what it is all about.
I am always available to answer any questions for new players and if I dont know the answer, I can get someone who does quickly.

Can we get Romo to give us a player/user count on GLB1 please?

im guessing its under 5,000 based on this post.

Originally posted by Longneck1845
Can we get Romo to give us a player/user count on GLB1 please?

im guessing its under 5,000 based on this post.

probably so if you ask WGG.
I just figured that someone had to post something positive about GLB classic on these forums since all we ever here over there is about how great this game is. That is unless you talk to someone who has played both and then they prefer GLB classic all day long.
There are those few that would disagree, but the majority of people who have played both that I know of prefer GLB1.

Originally posted by Longneck1845
Can we get Romo to give us a player/user count on GLB1 please?

im guessing its under 5,000 based on this post.

and asking ROMO for anything is like playing russian roulette

I guess I'm one of the few that would disagree. It took me a few months to get used to GLB2 but I never once had the urge to return to GLB Classic.

I try not to disrespect the game though I did play it since season 2 until GLB2 came out.

Originally posted by Spread-em offense
the majority of people who have played both that I know of prefer GLB1.


lolno

That's a laughable reach

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
lolno

That's a laughable reach

notice the "that I know" Romo.

and why the merge of the threads. Mine has nothing to do with jamz bullshit

Originally posted by TehKyou
I guess I'm one of the few that would disagree. It took me a few months to get used to GLB2 but I never once had the urge to return to GLB Classic.

I try not to disrespect the game though I did play it since season 2 until GLB2 came out.

so in 30+ seasons of GLB you could never figure it out enough to be good at it?

I don't remember you at all, funny how that works when you post on 2 different forums. I actually had a lot of suggestions that went into that game. I remember Staz's old Vet Ability thread. I'm going to go look for it. Some of my suggestions even made it into this game