User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Vet Ladder 4/11
Page:
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dee.
GG! I didn't put in a defense and it was our default MO buffet. Serving up hot and ready TDs! Like this one - http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/175634/1227631

Joaquin is a freaking beast!


No...the god of passing himself, Gali, said he is too uneffective and he should be dropped. If the god himself says so, there is no way that this Player has a future
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Peeti, the god of assholes and douches himself
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
Based in his career stats up to this season, yeah, he was extremely inefficient.

Kudos on figuring out how to use him.
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
He was the best WR on the first team he was on (Doge All Go or sth like that). After that team fold I was too lazy to find a team for him so I put him on the boobs, which like never ever passed. Tried to use him for screens, but I had to figure that defenses that are made to stop the outside runs, also destroy the screens. He never really had a chance. But besides that, his build prolly only works in VET, when all SPs could finally be assigned.

Still, you didnt say he was a waste of cap. You said he will still be
Edited by peeti on Apr 12, 2015 12:07:55
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
Based in his career stats up to this season, yeah, he was extremely inefficient.

Kudos on figuring out how to use him.


Had nothing to do with figuring out how to use him. Just had to hit 100 chemistry. I can understand why his career statistics prior to last season were meh though. Hadn't hit up on some of his receiving skills well enough.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
I do find the build interesting though. Blows a lot of typical preferences for WR's out of the water imo and he is probably much better off because of it.
 
TehKyou
offline
Link
 
It's not fair to keep such an "interesting" build away from the public. Open it ..... @#$^!
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
It used to be open until I got told how much it sucks
 
TehKyou
offline
Link
 
I'll show you mine if you show me yours
 
Longneck1845
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
I do find the build interesting though. Blows a lot of typical preferences for WR's out of the water imo and he is probably much better off because of it.


What's the build?? Power running for YAC???
 
TehKyou
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Longneck1845
What's the build?? Power running for YAC???


Looks more like elusive to me.
 
DeeVee8
Bucc'd Up
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TehKyou
Looks more like elusive to me.


He's got 36 reps and a pretty high 40 time. I'd say it's a good mixture of both. He always gains YAC. I'll say....80 power running and 90 sprinting/quickness.
Edited by Dee. on Apr 12, 2015 19:14:15
Edited by Dee. on Apr 12, 2015 19:13:55
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
I do like that Hillman's viable. I didn't think it'd work(based on a non S* build we did on Air Raid that just couldn't get targets) It's good that you can make a YAC guy. I'd guess he's mostly said piss-off to CiT and probably some of the route elusiveness/route tech stuff, or at least it's all very modestly invested. That leaves him with lower targets, but when he does get open and targeted, the defense pays for it.

I'd still rather have Tiny Rogers than Hillman. I think BHall should try and talk Tiny Roger's agent into signing with Run Defenders at WR2 next season if he hasn't already. Let Hillman pick on "cover" corners and FS at WR1. Have Rogers run the nice 2WR formation screens at WR2. Other than Tiny Rogers having to suffer under crappy chemistry mechanics, it'd be a fun offense to watch.
Edited by Galithor on Apr 12, 2015 20:56:53
Edited by Galithor on Apr 12, 2015 20:56:32
 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
Other than Tiny Rogers having to suffer under crappy chemistry mechanics, it'd be a fun offense to watch.


Why players and agents are penalized for spending $$$ in this game continues to baffle me.

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.