You seem upset.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Vet Ladder #1
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cuivienen
You seem upset.
He likes to blame chemistry when he can, but doesn't like it when others do the same thing.
You seem upset.
He likes to blame chemistry when he can, but doesn't like it when others do the same thing.
tezed
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
from what I've seen, DD is a legit top 5 team RIGHT NOW.
They can contend no doubt. not sure about claiming them as a top 5 team, I'd say more in the 6-8 range, but I see your point of having to potentially save face in case you lose
from what I've seen, DD is a legit top 5 team RIGHT NOW.
They can contend no doubt. not sure about claiming them as a top 5 team, I'd say more in the 6-8 range, but I see your point of having to potentially save face in case you lose
Edited by tezed on Mar 26, 2015 19:37:06
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by tezed
They can contend no doubt. not sure about claiming them as a top 5 team, I'd say more in the 6-8 range, but I see your point of having to potentially save face in case you lose
Classic TDiddy.
They can contend no doubt. not sure about claiming them as a top 5 team, I'd say more in the 6-8 range, but I see your point of having to potentially save face in case you lose
Classic TDiddy.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
I'm not trying to save face... I've played them three times since their guys went vet and know they can play us tight play for play. If I hadn't played them already, I honestly would have probably overlooked them. I'm not fully sold on QC, MMA, or Air Raid after their showings the first game (all dissapointed). It's not ridiculous to think DD is on that level... I'd probably have them #4 or #5 right now.
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 20:41:27
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 20:40:41
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 20:38:56
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
I'm not trying to save face... I've played them three times since their guys went vet and know they can play us tight play for play. If I hadn't played them already, I honestly would have probably overlooked them. I'm not fully sold on QC, MMA, or Air Raid after their showings the first game (all dissapointed). It's not ridiculous to think DD is on that level... I'd probably have them #4 or #5 right now.
Judging teams after 1 game? I guess if you lose tomorrow I'd put your team around the 10-12 range.
I'm not trying to save face... I've played them three times since their guys went vet and know they can play us tight play for play. If I hadn't played them already, I honestly would have probably overlooked them. I'm not fully sold on QC, MMA, or Air Raid after their showings the first game (all dissapointed). It's not ridiculous to think DD is on that level... I'd probably have them #4 or #5 right now.
Judging teams after 1 game? I guess if you lose tomorrow I'd put your team around the 10-12 range.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
I'm not trying to save face... I've played them three times since their guys went vet and know they can play us tight play for play. If I hadn't played them already, I honestly would have probably overlooked them. I'm not fully sold on QC, MMA, or Air Raid after their showings the first game (all dissapointed). It's not ridiculous to think DD is on that level... I'd probably have them #4 or #5 right now.
You know what I think? Harry ain't #2 quality without the QB rollout either. Rob, boon, romo, etc. They're all about to give your offense the full Air Raid treatment with defensive playcalling this season. And you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
I'm not trying to save face... I've played them three times since their guys went vet and know they can play us tight play for play. If I hadn't played them already, I honestly would have probably overlooked them. I'm not fully sold on QC, MMA, or Air Raid after their showings the first game (all dissapointed). It's not ridiculous to think DD is on that level... I'd probably have them #4 or #5 right now.
You know what I think? Harry ain't #2 quality without the QB rollout either. Rob, boon, romo, etc. They're all about to give your offense the full Air Raid treatment with defensive playcalling this season. And you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
Rob.
offline
offline
TDiddy thinks he is the only one dealing with chemistry. If he loses it's because of chemistry. If anyone else loses, they are a disappointment.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
another thread, more multiple posts making stuff up
Originally posted by Rob.
If he loses it's because of chemistry
once again, putting words in my mouth... with full chem, I think DD could still beat us, along with a few other teams. Minnesota could beat us by 40 this season and it wouldn't shock me. Dointin Assassins could beat us either way... i'd actually have them at #2 right now. QC could definitely beat us if they play at the top of their game, but they have been inconsistent. Ditto with MMA.
Originally posted by Galithor
you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
when did I say we did have as good a passing offense as Air Raid? Being balanced, we will probably never put up the numbers of pure passing teams. I said I think it was yesterday, I don't care about stats. If you really want me to be honest, offense has never been Air Raids issue, as I've said for many seasons... the defense is what can be shaky, and the new DC hasn't shown enough between the first game this season and the last few last season to really impress me
Originally posted by Rob.
If he loses it's because of chemistry
once again, putting words in my mouth... with full chem, I think DD could still beat us, along with a few other teams. Minnesota could beat us by 40 this season and it wouldn't shock me. Dointin Assassins could beat us either way... i'd actually have them at #2 right now. QC could definitely beat us if they play at the top of their game, but they have been inconsistent. Ditto with MMA.
Originally posted by Galithor
you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
when did I say we did have as good a passing offense as Air Raid? Being balanced, we will probably never put up the numbers of pure passing teams. I said I think it was yesterday, I don't care about stats. If you really want me to be honest, offense has never been Air Raids issue, as I've said for many seasons... the defense is what can be shaky, and the new DC hasn't shown enough between the first game this season and the last few last season to really impress me
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 21:57:22
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 21:56:27
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 21:54:00
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 21:53:03
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Mar 26, 2015 21:51:34
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
chemistry could be the difference
Originally posted by Rob.
If he loses it's because of chemistry.
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
once again, putting words in my mouth
chemistry could be the difference
Originally posted by Rob.
If he loses it's because of chemistry.
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
once again, putting words in my mouth
bhall43
offline
offline
meh Harrisonburg was always Cobb to me anyways. Their rushing game was just a sidetrack from doing better.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
You know what I think? Harry ain't #2 quality without the QB rollout either. Rob, boon, romo, etc. They're all about to give your offense the full Air Raid treatment with defensive playcalling this season. And you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
You were #2 before Harrisonburg and your defense wasn't near their quality. Remember the game is more than just one phase.
You know what I think? Harry ain't #2 quality without the QB rollout either. Rob, boon, romo, etc. They're all about to give your offense the full Air Raid treatment with defensive playcalling this season. And you're team ain't as good at what we do as we are.
You were #2 before Harrisonburg and your defense wasn't near their quality. Remember the game is more than just one phase.
Parab00n
offline
offline
GG Harrisonburg, both offenses looked like complete shit.
I absolutely hate shit like this though....
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/171511/193243
The going for it on 4th down is way too random in this game and in this case was most likely the difference between a win and a loss.
I absolutely hate shit like this though....
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/171511/193243
The going for it on 4th down is way too random in this game and in this case was most likely the difference between a win and a loss.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
GG Harrisonburg, both offenses looked like complete shit.
I absolutely hate shit like this though....
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/171511/193243
The going for it on 4th down is way too random in this game and in this case was most likely the difference between a win and a loss.
I thought Byrd was noticeably less effective on the Tiger blitz than Drummond. Different pass rush tactics? Looked like Drummond might've been set for evasive with Byrd on combo?
GG Harrisonburg, both offenses looked like complete shit.
I absolutely hate shit like this though....
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/171511/193243
The going for it on 4th down is way too random in this game and in this case was most likely the difference between a win and a loss.
I thought Byrd was noticeably less effective on the Tiger blitz than Drummond. Different pass rush tactics? Looked like Drummond might've been set for evasive with Byrd on combo?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
