Warrior General Games

I'm totally ok with starks rankings considering what im working with (mainly season 1 and i believe either season 3 or 4 guys)

Also interesting:

918 pass attempts vs Queen City from games against current top 20 teams.
450 of those went incomplete

Of the 450 that went incomplete:
- 193 unable to secure due to nearby defense
- 85 pass was deflected
- 60 dropped
- 24 knocked loose
- 1 intercepted (lol at the patheticness of this)
- The remaining 87 are just terribad throws.

In theory, if a defenders potential deflection ability bears no weight into the 'unable to secure due to nearby defense' calculations, you could just skip that skill completely. Forget trying to deflect the ball with 80+ deflection guys and just keep them at 35-40 in exchange for more coverage ability.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
I'm totally ok with starks rankings considering what im working with (mainly season 1 and i believe either season 3 or 4 guys)

Queen City is basically all s1 players. That's not really an excuse.

Interesting - Stunners have played 16 of 27 games against top 20 opponents.

922 pass attempts against us
488 of those went incomplete (I think - did you just go by the completion %?)

Of the 488 that went incomplete:
- 184 unable to secure due to nearby defense (20% of all passes)
- 92 pass was deflected (10% of all passes)
- 58 dropped (6% of all)
- 38 knocked loose (4% of all)
- 20 intercepted (2% of all)
- The remaining 96 are just terribad throws. (remaining 10% of all)
plus 47% completion (433)



not feeling too excited about my 90+ deflection skill!

Unable to Secure is effected by deflection skill, at least I've always thought it was.

So for all practical purposes, our pass defenses are exactly the same, except you knock loose and INT more.

Originally posted by Parab00n
Unable to Secure is effected by deflection skill, at least I've always thought it was.

I would assume it's a combination of defender proximity (and multiple defenders = multiplier effect) along with their deflect ability, but it could purely be defender proximity. Which would make deflect a pretty whomp skill to invest big into.

I never thought so. Would be interesting if a top team speaks up that hasn't put a lot of points into deflect comes forward

I've voiced it before that my CBs are not anything close to pass defenders, but y'all don't believe me, lol.

I knock loose 1.5% more often than you (so less than 1 time per game more - barely even worth noticing)

and I intercept 2% more than you

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
I've voiced it before that my CBs are not anything close to pass defenders, but y'all don't believe me, lol.

what kind of deflect do you have?

1 vs 20 INTs makes that 2% pretty large, though

Originally posted by TxSteve
what kind of deflect do you have?

trade secrets but I'll say that I have more pursuit than coverage tech and deflect on ALL of my CBs.

Ya- you have gotten an interception in less than 5% of the games...I've gotten more than 1 per game. Big difference - but I have invested in it

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Queen City is basically all s1 players. That's not really an excuse.

pretty sure your guys look better than stark lb and cb wise