Warrior General Games

If your CB's are the best man coverage guys around, your LB's can definitely get to the QB, and your D-Line can hold its own, go for it. I use an all man defensive playbook, so the 3-4 option comes up alot. I am a bigger fan of 4-3, but 3-4 can have its own benefits too. The four interceptions my team has (in Ladder games) came from the 3-4. 2 LB interceptions and two CB interceptions. It helps with hurrying the QB thus causing turnovers. With the inside rushing, just make sure your LB's are fast enough to stop the run in time. Higher power tackling equals more fumbles, but tackling grip, tackling tech, and strip tech are also effective enough too.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
I was thinking about restarting and running a 3-4 zone defense. Now that would be tough to pull off.

dont. Zone sucks

he already does a zone D
i run 3-4 exclusively which is why i probably wish we could make plays cause then my blitz's would be so much more creative

Originally posted by chronicbomb
he already does a zone D
i run 3-4 exclusively which is why i probably wish we could make plays cause then my blitz's would be so much more creative


You can submit plays for consideration.

If you look at the current available plays, you'll see notes in the lower right for player contributions.

Thread locked by moderator.

I have a feeling this wasn't locked on purpose...

Originally posted by Kayoh

tackles. C on the NT. Leaves the guards to get to the second level and block the ILBs...

What about the Gap Press and Sting Pinch plays? From the play art the d-line seems slightly closer together.

Originally posted by Stobie
Thread locked by moderator.

Yah I have no idea how the eff.... this happened, I know we have power tools to make this quicker, wonder if my son got my phone. Mind you he is 3....

Sorry for any issues this may have caused.

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
I have a feeling this wasn't locked on purpose...

Thanks!

I thought stobie was just thinking that a 3-4 is that bad, the OP has to troll. therefore closed

Hah, yeah...Offended by the thought of a 3-4 being useful, thread locked...lol that'll teach 'em.

Get that shat outta here!

If you want to run a trash talker, and also use cover 2 shell, you're looking at using a 3-4 and 3-3-5.

So there is that.

Originally posted by Galithor
If you want to run a trash talker, and also use cover 2 shell, you're looking at using a 3-4 and 3-3-5.

So there is that.

Eh, none of the Cover 2 shells in 3-4 or 3-3-5 send more than 4 guys. So even an awesome blitzing LB build would struggle to connect on those.

A trash talker?

Its an SA.