i know it was light years ago and there wasn't that diamond formation but I couldn't get good Rec. FB's the ball on the test server worth a shit regardless of the build. They just don't get any fascinating looks in GLB2. It is hard enough in GLB1 but the players are faster moving on routes/cuts and they can break more critical tackles.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Unique Interesting build ideas?
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
Power Rushing QB..http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/84924 ...anybody have a link to another one? I've never seen one.
RIP Tim Jortman
Power Rushing QB..http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/84924 ...anybody have a link to another one? I've never seen one.
RIP Tim Jortman
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
my combo back clem turned out pretty good (legit combo not power with some elusive or vise versa)
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by underdog13
thoughts on int lb? http://imgur.com/KjfSFMe
Better hope he doesn't have to tackle much
thoughts on int lb? http://imgur.com/KjfSFMe
Better hope he doesn't have to tackle much
Originally posted by jfbueno
Better hope he doesn't have to tackle much
Or face the run...
Better hope he doesn't have to tackle much
Or face the run...
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
What team was he on and why did Jude give up on the build? Rage had double the broken tackles in his second season. I am eagerly awaiting his end build with ~90 power rushing.
yorick's. he wasn't a S* though
What team was he on and why did Jude give up on the build? Rage had double the broken tackles in his second season. I am eagerly awaiting his end build with ~90 power rushing.
yorick's. he wasn't a S* though
Mordaloch
offline
offline
Go ahead and make a fumbling punter with lots of speed and balance perhaps he can rush for the first down instead lol
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
I have a veteran rushing FB. working on the really fast receiving ones. Personally I feel like it may be a waste of time to do a receiving one.
I don't disagree. without them legitimately being a run blocking threat, they don't present any dilemma to a defensive coordinator that a regular wr with better routes doesn't already do better.
I have a veteran rushing FB. working on the really fast receiving ones. Personally I feel like it may be a waste of time to do a receiving one.
I don't disagree. without them legitimately being a run blocking threat, they don't present any dilemma to a defensive coordinator that a regular wr with better routes doesn't already do better.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
I don't disagree. without them legitimately being a run blocking threat, they don't present any dilemma to a defensive coordinator that a regular wr with better routes doesn't already do better.
trying to make him as fast as possible in order to get somewhere in the route but still looks useless to me.
I don't disagree. without them legitimately being a run blocking threat, they don't present any dilemma to a defensive coordinator that a regular wr with better routes doesn't already do better.
trying to make him as fast as possible in order to get somewhere in the route but still looks useless to me.
kaiijy
offline
offline
Originally posted by underdog13
thoughts on int lb? http://imgur.com/KjfSFMe
Here's the interesting bit: deflecting is more important than intercepting. Actually, deflecting is the skill that really matters in coverage.
thoughts on int lb? http://imgur.com/KjfSFMe
Here's the interesting bit: deflecting is more important than intercepting. Actually, deflecting is the skill that really matters in coverage.
Originally posted by kaiijy
Here's the interesting bit: deflecting is more important than intercepting. Actually, deflecting is the skill that really matters in coverage.
What?
Here's the interesting bit: deflecting is more important than intercepting. Actually, deflecting is the skill that really matters in coverage.
What?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
