Originally posted by william78
I get what you are saying, however.... I don't think that is a particularly good system. Nor one that is posted (leading to too much conjecture).
I won't hook thread because its posted already in my suggestion but strictly points isn't a great system since it rewards already weaker divisions (again I have no issue with MCM and Warsaw making it.. but just in general). - IE if you have a CPU team in your division you are likely to shut them out twice a season and score a ton of points.
Why I prefer quality wins or net differential in head to head matchups.
Above all while keeping the game mechanics secret I get (so that people don't min / max)... I see zero benefit to doing so in the case of the tiebreakers.I never said it is a good system
And I totally agree. The players have to know how tie breakers work exactlly, everything else makes no sense. Right now, we have a quote here and there but nothing that is kind of offical or in depth.
If you have a 3+-team-tie with teams from different divisions, you have one problem. Teams have a different number of games against each other, so you cant look at matchup numbers. e.g. Tiger: Music City and Warsaw played 3 games within the 3 teams of the tie, while Dakota only played 2 games.