Warrior General Games

Originally posted by nortobc
- I will have a DT and OT, which are cheap
- I will not have a QB SS

My SSs will be:
HB, WR, OT, DT, DE, DE, OLB

So I might be able to get away with it. I am also prepared to only sign 42 players.

SS QB is what really hurts so I can see that as possible I guess... didn't think of that option. HB and WR are not cheap either so might be a tight squeeze. Hope it works out though.

Also riddle me this... they have 37 players which is how they can pull it off... but how do you have a negative salary cap???

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/roster/161

Originally posted by Stobie
Also riddle me this... they have 37 players which is how they can pull it off... but how do you have a negative salary cap???

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/roster/161


It's from when they rolled over from rookie to sophomore. The contracts increased to give them a negative value. what it does mean is, they'll have to cut somebody this offseason before moving to Seasoned. So they're looking at a 36 player minimum sized roster going forward, or adding something cheap to replace whatever player they cut.

If you are maxxed on cap, but have a lowbie on your roster, you will break cap in the following season.

isn't 37 the minimum? or is it 36?

Also the mega superstar team isn't really as good as some may think.

Originally posted by Galithor
It's from when they rolled over from rookie to sophomore. The contracts increased to give them a negative value. what it does mean is, they'll have to cut somebody this offseason before moving to Seasoned. So they're looking at a 36 player minimum sized roster going forward, or adding something cheap to replace whatever player they cut.

They just need to put a low contract surely?

Ya but who wants to play with a low contract?

Better than not playing at all!

Or a bunch of medium contracts.

*affect