Go ahead and implement this so Jampy can make his own crappy players. Right now he says I made all those players on AGDTD.
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > @Corndog. Why can't we have flex banks?
That's not even what the flex bank does, awful troll attempt. Away with you.
Originally posted by Corndog
Slapping a "give us money" button everywhere is a pretty big turnoff. But I guess I'll consider adding it if it was actually a feature people used.
Kinda funny how one of your biggest moneymakers (outside the obvious player creation and team ownership) isn't even recognized by the devs.
Slapping a "give us money" button everywhere is a pretty big turnoff. But I guess I'll consider adding it if it was actually a feature people used.
Kinda funny how one of your biggest moneymakers (outside the obvious player creation and team ownership) isn't even recognized by the devs.
ahnonamis
offline
offline
I know I would definitely appreciate it as an owner if other people who wanted to contribute toward scrimmages would be able to.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Originally posted by ahnonamis
I know I would definitely appreciate it as an owner if other people who wanted to contribute toward scrimmages would be able to.
I know I would definitely appreciate it as an owner if other people who wanted to contribute toward scrimmages would be able to.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Originally posted by bdnannac
Go ahead and implement this so Jampy can make his own crappy players. Right now he says I made all those players on AGDTD.
Go ahead and implement this so Jampy can make his own crappy players. Right now he says I made all those players on AGDTD.
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by ahnonamis
I know I would definitely appreciate it as an owner if other people who wanted to contribute toward scrimmages would be able to.
I know I would appreciate it as a GM if my owner could dump a whole bunch of his flex so I could run scrimmages on my schedule not his
I know I would definitely appreciate it as an owner if other people who wanted to contribute toward scrimmages would be able to.
I know I would appreciate it as a GM if my owner could dump a whole bunch of his flex so I could run scrimmages on my schedule not his
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Kinda funny how one of your biggest moneymakers (outside the obvious player creation and team ownership) isn't even recognized by the devs.
So the "biggest moneymaker" outside of all other money makers.
Well said.
Kinda funny how one of your biggest moneymakers (outside the obvious player creation and team ownership) isn't even recognized by the devs.
So the "biggest moneymaker" outside of all other money makers.
Well said.
If team flex banks makes more bread than player creation and team ownership, then glb has died and yello and Dub J are battling it out for s60 WL title.
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
That's not even what the flex bank does, awful troll attempt. Away with you.
notsure why this is getting downvoted... do 3 of you not know what the flex bank does?
That's not even what the flex bank does, awful troll attempt. Away with you.
notsure why this is getting downvoted... do 3 of you not know what the flex bank does?
bhall43
offline
offline
lol Team flex bank isn't a huge money maker. It isn't like people are buying hordes of flex to pay for other peoples scrims.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
lol Team flex bank isn't a huge money maker. It isn't like people are buying hordes of flex to pay for other peoples scrims.
When the team has a full flex bank, they scrim more.
When teams scrim more, flex is consumed.
When flex is consumed it comes from somewhere. Though probably from the big spenders more than the "okay I need to retire someone to make you a new dot" crew.
I don't even notice tbh. I'm sitting on 141,030 flex from dot retirements and haven't bought flex in over a year. I still have tons of dots that can be retired for more in both GLB1 and 2.
If the player development cycle in GLB1 wasn't so long, I would probably build more players. I'm just not interested in waiting over a year for my players to be level 73+.
Since the player build cycle is so long, it takes a lot longer for me to spend all my flex or to deal with retirement losses. For that reason, so long as I don't significantly increase my player creation, I can go years on the flex that used to be "required" to fill a whole team.
If they took the player build cycle from 1.5 years down to .5 years I would be buying a lot more flex and building a lot more players.
lol Team flex bank isn't a huge money maker. It isn't like people are buying hordes of flex to pay for other peoples scrims.
When the team has a full flex bank, they scrim more.
When teams scrim more, flex is consumed.
When flex is consumed it comes from somewhere. Though probably from the big spenders more than the "okay I need to retire someone to make you a new dot" crew.
I don't even notice tbh. I'm sitting on 141,030 flex from dot retirements and haven't bought flex in over a year. I still have tons of dots that can be retired for more in both GLB1 and 2.
If the player development cycle in GLB1 wasn't so long, I would probably build more players. I'm just not interested in waiting over a year for my players to be level 73+.
Since the player build cycle is so long, it takes a lot longer for me to spend all my flex or to deal with retirement losses. For that reason, so long as I don't significantly increase my player creation, I can go years on the flex that used to be "required" to fill a whole team.
If they took the player build cycle from 1.5 years down to .5 years I would be buying a lot more flex and building a lot more players.
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
I don't even notice tbh. I'm sitting on 141,030 flex from dot retirements and haven't bought flex in over a year. I still have tons of dots that can be retired for more in both GLB1 and 2.
Corndog, not only do we need a flex bank, we need alms cups so TT can send poor starving agents like me piles o' flex
I don't even notice tbh. I'm sitting on 141,030 flex from dot retirements and haven't bought flex in over a year. I still have tons of dots that can be retired for more in both GLB1 and 2.
Corndog, not only do we need a flex bank, we need alms cups so TT can send poor starving agents like me piles o' flex
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
Corndog, not only do we need a flex bank, we need alms cups so TT can send poor starving agents like me piles o' flex
Should be able to "top up" a purchase.
I see why they don't want to allow us to just give away all of our flex, but it might be used as an incentive to buy more flex.
Like I could donate 100,000 flex to someone, but the only way for them to get it would be to buy flex.
So if I donated 100,000 flex to someone and that person bought 10,000 flex, they would get 10,000 flex from the flex that I donated to them and still have 90,000 flex donated, but unusable.
It would help transition people out of the game and would encourage active users to spend more money.
Like I used to be really active and would have had no problem burning through that flex, but I'm not as active anymore, so that flex will take years to burn through.
If there is someone just getting really active, getting an extra 100,000 in free flex might be enough to convince them to buy that MVP package or a series of 20,000 flex purchases over time.
Corndog, not only do we need a flex bank, we need alms cups so TT can send poor starving agents like me piles o' flex
Should be able to "top up" a purchase.
I see why they don't want to allow us to just give away all of our flex, but it might be used as an incentive to buy more flex.
Like I could donate 100,000 flex to someone, but the only way for them to get it would be to buy flex.
So if I donated 100,000 flex to someone and that person bought 10,000 flex, they would get 10,000 flex from the flex that I donated to them and still have 90,000 flex donated, but unusable.
It would help transition people out of the game and would encourage active users to spend more money.
Like I used to be really active and would have had no problem burning through that flex, but I'm not as active anymore, so that flex will take years to burn through.
If there is someone just getting really active, getting an extra 100,000 in free flex might be enough to convince them to buy that MVP package or a series of 20,000 flex purchases over time.
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
Like I used to be really active and would have had no problem burning through that flex, but I'm not as active anymore, so that flex will take years to burn through.
Well, if you want to burn through all that flex, reset your team to rookie, hire me as GM, build the types of players I want, and run 2-3 scrimmages between games so I can tweak things to my heart's content.
It'll take you no time at all to kiss that 100k goodbye
As for the original flex bank idea, I know it'd make things easier for all the Lounge teams as Sieg, Sar, Rom, and I all like running scrimmages but the flex drain gets in the way and none of the other Loungers can help out.
Like I used to be really active and would have had no problem burning through that flex, but I'm not as active anymore, so that flex will take years to burn through.
Well, if you want to burn through all that flex, reset your team to rookie, hire me as GM, build the types of players I want, and run 2-3 scrimmages between games so I can tweak things to my heart's content.
It'll take you no time at all to kiss that 100k goodbye
As for the original flex bank idea, I know it'd make things easier for all the Lounge teams as Sieg, Sar, Rom, and I all like running scrimmages but the flex drain gets in the way and none of the other Loungers can help out.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
