I can understand the fact that the GLB2 admins missed some blatant cheating. What really angers me that they are treating us like we're stupid. They claim they have fixed the problem, even though there are obviously more than 20 multi-account players still on the Saints roster.
Sean Payton
offline
offline
Nice thread y'all got going here. Listen here fucktards, I am not and was not a multi. However, it appears my HC was and it seems he has been dealt with which is why I had to tap into my flex bank and make a bunch of players. For those of you that are new to GLB and GLB2, here's a history lesson. I own one of the most successful teams in GLB and have built some of the best players in the game and played for the best teams. I used to be a paid admin, but had to resign due to real life obligations. GLB2 seems a little interesting as GLB got old after 5 years. So if any of you fools want to play for a winner, come on down and I'll gladly welcome you onto a winning franchise, but don't every accuse me of being a multi again.
Also, for what it's worth, Customer Support never contacted me as they know I'm not a multi.
Also, for what it's worth, Customer Support never contacted me as they know I'm not a multi.
McMichael
offline
offline
I dont think anyone said you specifically were a multi, they did correctly note that your team was comprised primarily of a multi. And how did you miss the fact that most of the players all had log on/off times within 10 minutes of each other? Before you come on here and get pissy you should look into the facts a little closer.
Edit: and I just looked and there still seems to be a number of players/agents with logout times around 2:40am +/- 5 minutes.
Edit: and I just looked and there still seems to be a number of players/agents with logout times around 2:40am +/- 5 minutes.
Edited by McMichael on Apr 14, 2014 20:02:11
stareagle
offline
offline
I don't care if you are the multi or if it was your HC. The point remains that the Saints went 7-0 using a huge number of players that were illegally made. You might have had no idea that there were multis on your team -- and that there still appear to be more than 20 of them on your current roster -- but someone was cheating.
Of course, with your supposed GLB history, it might not be as surprising that nothing was done about it.
(Also, since HCs don't have the ability to sign players, how did he fill your team up with his dots?)
Of course, with your supposed GLB history, it might not be as surprising that nothing was done about it.
(Also, since HCs don't have the ability to sign players, how did he fill your team up with his dots?)
Edited by stareagle on Apr 14, 2014 20:35:42
pabloex
offline
offline
Normally when someone starts a thread calling people names and immediately dropping the F-Bomb, it is a sign of a limited viewpoint and 99% of the time, the person won't be open minded enough to understand the larger picture or the perspective of others. Going to see if you happen to fall into the other 1%.
So here is the deal:
You own the team. You made 'roger1' the Head Coach. Did you have any interaction with him at all? What were your team forums like? For you to come in here and claim you have run great teams and made great players, to me it stands to reason that you would have been interested in the players on your team and wouldn't have just turned over recruiting without any input.
So, you may not be a multi and I for one will say I am sorry that I assumed you controlled the whole team but you are complicit in this deal no matter how vehemently you come in here to defend your good name. And what makes it more laughable is that having been involved in the running of GLB1 (as you claim) that you came in and allowed this to happen on a team you run.
You still have players on your team that are part of the multi issue. So you can play the part of the offended, innocent agent just here to have fun but I am gonna have to call BS on this show.
So here is the deal:
You own the team. You made 'roger1' the Head Coach. Did you have any interaction with him at all? What were your team forums like? For you to come in here and claim you have run great teams and made great players, to me it stands to reason that you would have been interested in the players on your team and wouldn't have just turned over recruiting without any input.
So, you may not be a multi and I for one will say I am sorry that I assumed you controlled the whole team but you are complicit in this deal no matter how vehemently you come in here to defend your good name. And what makes it more laughable is that having been involved in the running of GLB1 (as you claim) that you came in and allowed this to happen on a team you run.
You still have players on your team that are part of the multi issue. So you can play the part of the offended, innocent agent just here to have fun but I am gonna have to call BS on this show.
Edited by pabloex on Apr 14, 2014 20:32:38
Edited by pabloex on Apr 14, 2014 20:31:55
Edited by pabloex on Apr 14, 2014 20:15:47
Edited by pabloex on Apr 14, 2014 20:03:21
Originally posted by Sean Payton
I used to be a paid admin, but had to resign due to real life obligations.
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
I used to be a paid admin, but had to resign due to real life obligations.
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
sparkhazel
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
....if you smell something crispy coming off our tail pipes.... its just a little *Shake*.... and .....*Bake* Shake And Bake!!
That is all... carry on
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
....if you smell something crispy coming off our tail pipes.... its just a little *Shake*.... and .....*Bake* Shake And Bake!!
That is all... carry on
Sean Payton
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
Oh, my bad, moderator. My moderator time was before you joined GLB.
2010-09-21 00:18:10 stipend 75
2010-09-20 02:21:15 stipend 75
2010-09-19 00:19:46 stipend 75
2010-09-18 00:21:06 stipend 75
2010-09-17 00:20:43 stipend 75
2010-09-16 00:23:44 stipend 75
2010-09-15 00:20:57 stipend 75
2010-09-14 00:24:16 stipend 75
2010-09-13 00:10:11 stipend 75
2010-09-12 00:11:00 stipend 75
2010-09-11 00:09:35 stipend 75
2010-09-10 00:09:28 stipend 75
2010-09-09 00:09:29 stipend 75
2010-09-08 07:32:27 stipend 75
2010-09-07 00:12:09 stipend 75
2010-09-06 00:16:29 stipend 75
2010-09-05 00:16:29 stipend 75
2010-09-04 00:15:41 stipend 75
2010-09-03 00:16:34 stipend 75
2010-09-02 00:14:51 stipend 75
2010-09-01 02:13:40 stipend 75
2010-08-31 00:14:56 stipend 75
2010-08-30 00:17:27 stipend 75
2010-08-29 00:15:20 stipend 75
2010-08-28 00:16:38 stipend 75
2010-08-27 00:12:58 stipend 75
2010-08-26 00:13:35 stipend 75
2010-08-25 00:14:51 stipend 75
2010-08-24 00:16:40 stipend 75
2010-08-23 00:18:07 stipend 75
2010-08-22 00:17:19 stipend 75
2010-08-21 00:17:44 stipend 75
2010-08-20 00:17:19 stipend 75
2010-08-19 00:17:08 stipend 75
2010-08-18 00:19:13 stipend 75
2010-08-17 00:20:13 stipend 75
2010-08-16 00:18:02 stipend 75
2010-08-15 00:17:55 stipend 75
2010-08-14 00:22:22 stipend 75
2010-08-13 00:18:40 stipend 75
2010-08-12 00:19:47 stipend 75
2010-08-11 00:19:38 stipend 75
2010-08-10 00:20:49 stipend 75
2010-08-09 00:22:48 stipend 75
2010-08-08 00:22:08 stipend 75
2010-08-07 00:22:15 stipend 75
2010-08-06 00:23:33 stipend 75
2010-08-05 00:23:03 stipend 75
2010-08-04 00:23:21 stipend 75
2010-08-03 00:23:00 stipend 75
2010-08-02 00:22:50 stipend 75
2010-08-01 00:22:32 stipend 75
2010-07-31 00:24:09 stipend 75
2010-07-30 00:22:01 stipend 75
2010-07-29 00:22:44 stipend 75
2010-07-28 00:25:03 stipend 75
2010-07-27 00:23:30 stipend 75
2010-07-26 00:25:02 stipend 75
2010-07-25 00:23:10 stipend 75
2010-07-24 00:23:51 stipend 75
2010-07-23 00:21:56 stipend 75
2010-07-22 00:23:43 stipend 75
2010-07-21 00:23:56 stipend 75
2010-07-20 01:02:27 stipend 75
2010-07-19 00:08:14 stipend 75
2010-07-18 00:09:25 stipend 75
2010-07-17 00:08:48 stipend 75
2010-07-16 00:08:30 stipend 75
2010-07-15 00:08:12 stipend 75
2010-07-14 07:32:09 stipend 75
2010-07-13 00:11:14 stipend 75
2010-07-12 00:17:37 stipend 75
2010-07-11 00:16:03 stipend 75
2010-07-10 00:15:21 stipend 75
2010-07-09 00:14:25 stipend 75
2010-07-08 00:15:49 stipend 75
2010-07-07 00:16:17 stipend 75
2010-07-06 00:17:43 stipend 75
2010-07-05 00:16:22 stipend 75
2010-07-04 00:16:46 stipend 75
2010-07-03 00:12:39 stipend 75
2010-07-02 00:12:57 stipend 75
2010-07-01 00:12:44 stipend 75
2010-06-30 00:13:53 stipend 75
2010-06-29 00:13:08 stipend 75
2010-06-28 00:13:43 stipend 75
2010-06-27 00:14:39 stipend 75
2010-06-26 00:14:31 stipend 75
2010-06-25 00:15:01 stipend 75
2010-06-24 00:14:26 stipend 75
2010-06-23 00:21:21 stipend 75
2010-06-22 00:14:09 stipend 75
2010-06-21 00:14:47 stipend 75
2010-06-20 00:15:53 stipend 75
2010-06-19 00:14:13 stipend 75
2010-06-18 00:15:46 stipend 75
2010-06-17 00:16:00 stipend 75
2010-06-16 00:17:11 stipend 75
2010-06-15 00:15:44 stipend 75
2010-06-14 00:16:17 stipend 75
2010-06-13 00:18:13 stipend 75
2010-06-12 00:17:21 stipend 75
2010-06-11 00:27:15 stipend 75
2010-06-10 00:27:37 stipend 75
2010-06-09 00:28:21 stipend 75
2010-06-08 00:26:55 stipend 75
2010-06-07 00:28:31 stipend 75
2010-06-06 00:27:26 stipend 75
2010-06-05 00:27:39 stipend 75
2010-06-04 00:33:38 stipend 75
2010-06-03 00:30:31 stipend 75
2010-06-02 00:32:49 stipend 75
2010-06-01 00:32:45 stipend 75
2010-05-31 00:32:15 stipend 75
2010-05-30 00:30:13 stipend 75
2010-05-29 00:31:26 stipend 75
2010-05-28 00:31:26 stipend 75
2010-05-27 00:34:48 stipend 75
2010-05-26 00:32:40 stipend 75
2010-05-25 02:07:25 stipend 75
2010-05-24 00:17:34 stipend 75
2010-05-23 00:18:03 stipend 75
2010-05-22 00:18:06 stipend 75
2010-05-21 00:17:05 stipend 75
2010-05-20 00:17:24 stipend 75
2010-05-19 00:16:38 stipend 75
2010-05-18 08:12:29 stipend 75
2010-05-17 00:22:43 stipend 75
2010-05-16 00:25:47 stipend 75
2010-05-15 00:26:41 stipend 75
2010-05-14 00:27:01 stipend 75
2010-05-13 00:29:30 stipend 75
2010-05-12 00:27:06 stipend 75
2010-05-11 00:26:43 stipend 75
2010-05-10 00:29:28 stipend 75
2010-05-09 00:46:42 stipend 75
2010-05-08 00:32:53 stipend 75
2010-05-07 00:21:44 stipend 75
2010-05-06 00:22:31 stipend 75
2010-05-05 00:24:34 stipend 75
2010-05-04 00:25:16 stipend 75
2010-05-03 00:24:34 stipend 75
2010-05-02 00:25:25 stipend 75
2010-05-01 00:56:06 stipend 75
2010-04-30 00:27:55 stipend 75
2010-04-29 00:28:39 stipend 75
2010-04-28 00:29:59 stipend 75
2010-04-27 00:32:17 stipend 75
2010-04-26 00:33:09 stipend 75
2010-04-25 00:32:02 stipend 75
2010-04-24 00:30:43 stipend 75
2010-04-23 00:33:19 stipend 75
2010-04-22 00:36:36 stipend 75
2010-04-21 00:33:31 stipend 75
2010-04-20 00:38:48 stipend 75
2010-04-19 00:37:11 stipend 75
2010-04-18 00:41:19 stipend 75
2010-04-17 00:41:39 stipend 75
2010-04-16 00:41:07 stipend 75
2010-04-15 00:41:57 stipend 75
2010-04-14 00:41:37 stipend 75
2010-04-13 00:40:47 stipend 75
2010-04-12 00:43:38 stipend 75
2010-04-11 00:44:06 stipend 75
2010-04-10 00:42:28 stipend 75
2010-04-09 00:36:37 stipend 75
2010-04-08 00:41:54 stipend 75
2010-04-07 00:37:03 stipend 75
2010-04-06 00:33:02 stipend 75
2010-04-05 00:33:26 stipend 75
2010-04-04 00:33:12 stipend 75
2010-04-03 00:37:38 stipend 75
2010-04-02 00:34:11 stipend 75
2010-04-01 00:34:10 stipend 75
2010-03-31 00:40:36 stipend 75
2010-03-30 00:34:44 stipend 75
2010-03-29 00:51:17 stipend 75
2010-03-28 00:19:07 stipend 75
2010-03-27 00:17:27 stipend 75
2010-03-26 00:19:15 stipend 75
2010-03-25 00:16:03 stipend 75
2010-03-24 00:14:59 stipend 75
2010-03-23 00:15:47 stipend 75
2010-03-22 00:15:07 stipend 75
2010-03-21 08:35:26 stipend 75
2010-03-20 03:27:20 stipend 75
2010-03-19 00:27:41 stipend 75
2010-03-18 00:23:46 stipend 75
2010-03-17 00:22:26 stipend 75
2010-03-16 00:23:31 stipend 75
2010-03-15 00:22:10 stipend 75
2010-03-14 00:25:00 stipend 75
2010-03-13 00:24:27 stipend 75
2010-03-12 00:27:12 stipend 75
2010-03-11 00:28:31 stipend 75
2010-03-10 00:19:46 stipend 75
2010-03-09 00:18:53 stipend 75
2010-03-08 00:18:56 stipend 75
2010-03-07 00:20:34 stipend 75
2010-03-06 00:20:36 stipend 75
2010-03-05 00:21:52 stipend 75
2010-03-04 00:21:36 stipend 75
2010-03-03 00:23:09 stipend 75
2010-03-02 00:24:06 stipend 75
2010-03-01 00:22:03 stipend 75
2010-02-28 00:23:45 stipend 75
2010-02-27 00:25:19 stipend 75
2010-02-26 00:24:47 stipend 75
2010-02-25 00:25:58 stipend 75
2010-02-24 00:27:30 stipend 75
2010-02-23 00:27:06 stipend 75
2010-02-22 00:27:39 stipend 75
2010-02-21 00:31:22 stipend 75
2010-02-20 00:27:52 stipend 75
2010-02-19 00:28:09 stipend 75
2010-02-18 00:37:49 stipend 75
2010-02-17 00:35:52 stipend 75
2010-02-16 00:36:42 stipend 75
2010-02-15 00:35:20 stipend 75
2010-02-14 00:37:39 stipend 75
2010-02-13 00:35:37 stipend 75
2010-02-12 00:35:57 stipend 75
2010-02-11 00:34:27 stipend 75
2010-02-10 00:31:11 stipend 75
2010-02-09 00:26:07 stipend 75
2010-02-08 00:26:40 stipend 75
2010-02-07 00:30:11 stipend 75
2010-02-06 00:30:10 stipend 75
2010-02-05 00:30:20 stipend 75
2010-02-04 00:32:07 stipend 75
2010-02-03 00:31:31 stipend 75
2010-02-02 00:32:53 stipend 75
2010-02-01 00:33:52 stipend 75
2010-01-31 00:36:35 stipend 75
2010-01-30 04:14:05 stipend 75
2010-01-29 00:14:08 stipend 75
2010-01-28 00:14:19 stipend 75
2010-01-27 00:13:54 stipend 75
2010-01-26 00:14:22 stipend 75
2010-01-25 00:15:04 stipend 75
2010-01-24 00:13:30 stipend 75
2010-01-23 00:15:13 stipend 75
2010-01-22 00:12:58 stipend 75
2010-01-21 10:10:32 stipend 75
2010-01-20 00:18:32 stipend 75
2010-01-19 00:22:48 stipend 75
2010-01-18 00:22:20 stipend 75
2010-01-17 00:23:26 stipend 75
2010-01-16 00:23:23 stipend 75
2010-01-15 00:22:12 stipend 75
2010-01-14 00:24:09 stipend 75
2010-01-13 00:26:56 stipend 75
2010-01-12 00:29:43 stipend 75
2010-01-11 00:24:30 stipend 75
2010-01-10 00:18:13 stipend 75
2010-01-09 00:20:15 stipend 75
2010-01-08 00:19:37 stipend 75
2010-01-07 00:20:39 stipend 75
2010-01-06 00:19:43 stipend 75
2010-01-05 00:21:17 stipend 75
2010-01-04 00:22:07 stipend 75
2010-01-03 00:22:32 stipend 75
2010-01-02 00:22:03 stipend 75
2010-01-01 00:23:34 stipend 75
2009-12-31 00:22:19 stipend 75
2009-12-30 00:25:09 stipend 75
2009-12-29 00:27:44 stipend 75
2009-12-28 00:28:50 stipend 75
2009-12-27 00:28:35 stipend 75
2009-12-26 00:28:10 stipend 75
2009-12-25 00:29:13 stipend 75
2009-12-24 00:30:59 stipend 75
2009-12-23 00:31:31 stipend 75
2009-12-22 00:32:20 stipend 75
2009-12-21 00:32:57 stipend 75
2009-12-20 00:34:06 stipend 75
2009-12-19 00:35:49 stipend 75
2009-12-18 00:36:13 stipend 75
2009-12-17 00:38:11 stipend 75
2009-12-16 00:33:06 stipend 75
2009-12-15 00:33:07 stipend 75
2009-12-14 00:32:56 stipend 75
2009-12-13 00:30:05 stipend 75
2009-12-12 00:25:04 stipend 75
2009-12-11 00:30:46 stipend 75
2009-12-10 00:26:24 stipend 75
2009-12-09 00:25:12 stipend 75
2009-12-08 00:26:34 stipend 75
2009-12-07 00:22:47 stipend 75
2009-12-06 00:24:30 stipend 75
2009-12-05 00:30:52 stipend 75
2009-12-04 00:31:31 stipend 75
No, you were not.
It would be pretty cool if you would refrain from making those ridiculous claims in the future, thanks.
Oh, my bad, moderator. My moderator time was before you joined GLB.
2010-09-21 00:18:10 stipend 75
2010-09-20 02:21:15 stipend 75
2010-09-19 00:19:46 stipend 75
2010-09-18 00:21:06 stipend 75
2010-09-17 00:20:43 stipend 75
2010-09-16 00:23:44 stipend 75
2010-09-15 00:20:57 stipend 75
2010-09-14 00:24:16 stipend 75
2010-09-13 00:10:11 stipend 75
2010-09-12 00:11:00 stipend 75
2010-09-11 00:09:35 stipend 75
2010-09-10 00:09:28 stipend 75
2010-09-09 00:09:29 stipend 75
2010-09-08 07:32:27 stipend 75
2010-09-07 00:12:09 stipend 75
2010-09-06 00:16:29 stipend 75
2010-09-05 00:16:29 stipend 75
2010-09-04 00:15:41 stipend 75
2010-09-03 00:16:34 stipend 75
2010-09-02 00:14:51 stipend 75
2010-09-01 02:13:40 stipend 75
2010-08-31 00:14:56 stipend 75
2010-08-30 00:17:27 stipend 75
2010-08-29 00:15:20 stipend 75
2010-08-28 00:16:38 stipend 75
2010-08-27 00:12:58 stipend 75
2010-08-26 00:13:35 stipend 75
2010-08-25 00:14:51 stipend 75
2010-08-24 00:16:40 stipend 75
2010-08-23 00:18:07 stipend 75
2010-08-22 00:17:19 stipend 75
2010-08-21 00:17:44 stipend 75
2010-08-20 00:17:19 stipend 75
2010-08-19 00:17:08 stipend 75
2010-08-18 00:19:13 stipend 75
2010-08-17 00:20:13 stipend 75
2010-08-16 00:18:02 stipend 75
2010-08-15 00:17:55 stipend 75
2010-08-14 00:22:22 stipend 75
2010-08-13 00:18:40 stipend 75
2010-08-12 00:19:47 stipend 75
2010-08-11 00:19:38 stipend 75
2010-08-10 00:20:49 stipend 75
2010-08-09 00:22:48 stipend 75
2010-08-08 00:22:08 stipend 75
2010-08-07 00:22:15 stipend 75
2010-08-06 00:23:33 stipend 75
2010-08-05 00:23:03 stipend 75
2010-08-04 00:23:21 stipend 75
2010-08-03 00:23:00 stipend 75
2010-08-02 00:22:50 stipend 75
2010-08-01 00:22:32 stipend 75
2010-07-31 00:24:09 stipend 75
2010-07-30 00:22:01 stipend 75
2010-07-29 00:22:44 stipend 75
2010-07-28 00:25:03 stipend 75
2010-07-27 00:23:30 stipend 75
2010-07-26 00:25:02 stipend 75
2010-07-25 00:23:10 stipend 75
2010-07-24 00:23:51 stipend 75
2010-07-23 00:21:56 stipend 75
2010-07-22 00:23:43 stipend 75
2010-07-21 00:23:56 stipend 75
2010-07-20 01:02:27 stipend 75
2010-07-19 00:08:14 stipend 75
2010-07-18 00:09:25 stipend 75
2010-07-17 00:08:48 stipend 75
2010-07-16 00:08:30 stipend 75
2010-07-15 00:08:12 stipend 75
2010-07-14 07:32:09 stipend 75
2010-07-13 00:11:14 stipend 75
2010-07-12 00:17:37 stipend 75
2010-07-11 00:16:03 stipend 75
2010-07-10 00:15:21 stipend 75
2010-07-09 00:14:25 stipend 75
2010-07-08 00:15:49 stipend 75
2010-07-07 00:16:17 stipend 75
2010-07-06 00:17:43 stipend 75
2010-07-05 00:16:22 stipend 75
2010-07-04 00:16:46 stipend 75
2010-07-03 00:12:39 stipend 75
2010-07-02 00:12:57 stipend 75
2010-07-01 00:12:44 stipend 75
2010-06-30 00:13:53 stipend 75
2010-06-29 00:13:08 stipend 75
2010-06-28 00:13:43 stipend 75
2010-06-27 00:14:39 stipend 75
2010-06-26 00:14:31 stipend 75
2010-06-25 00:15:01 stipend 75
2010-06-24 00:14:26 stipend 75
2010-06-23 00:21:21 stipend 75
2010-06-22 00:14:09 stipend 75
2010-06-21 00:14:47 stipend 75
2010-06-20 00:15:53 stipend 75
2010-06-19 00:14:13 stipend 75
2010-06-18 00:15:46 stipend 75
2010-06-17 00:16:00 stipend 75
2010-06-16 00:17:11 stipend 75
2010-06-15 00:15:44 stipend 75
2010-06-14 00:16:17 stipend 75
2010-06-13 00:18:13 stipend 75
2010-06-12 00:17:21 stipend 75
2010-06-11 00:27:15 stipend 75
2010-06-10 00:27:37 stipend 75
2010-06-09 00:28:21 stipend 75
2010-06-08 00:26:55 stipend 75
2010-06-07 00:28:31 stipend 75
2010-06-06 00:27:26 stipend 75
2010-06-05 00:27:39 stipend 75
2010-06-04 00:33:38 stipend 75
2010-06-03 00:30:31 stipend 75
2010-06-02 00:32:49 stipend 75
2010-06-01 00:32:45 stipend 75
2010-05-31 00:32:15 stipend 75
2010-05-30 00:30:13 stipend 75
2010-05-29 00:31:26 stipend 75
2010-05-28 00:31:26 stipend 75
2010-05-27 00:34:48 stipend 75
2010-05-26 00:32:40 stipend 75
2010-05-25 02:07:25 stipend 75
2010-05-24 00:17:34 stipend 75
2010-05-23 00:18:03 stipend 75
2010-05-22 00:18:06 stipend 75
2010-05-21 00:17:05 stipend 75
2010-05-20 00:17:24 stipend 75
2010-05-19 00:16:38 stipend 75
2010-05-18 08:12:29 stipend 75
2010-05-17 00:22:43 stipend 75
2010-05-16 00:25:47 stipend 75
2010-05-15 00:26:41 stipend 75
2010-05-14 00:27:01 stipend 75
2010-05-13 00:29:30 stipend 75
2010-05-12 00:27:06 stipend 75
2010-05-11 00:26:43 stipend 75
2010-05-10 00:29:28 stipend 75
2010-05-09 00:46:42 stipend 75
2010-05-08 00:32:53 stipend 75
2010-05-07 00:21:44 stipend 75
2010-05-06 00:22:31 stipend 75
2010-05-05 00:24:34 stipend 75
2010-05-04 00:25:16 stipend 75
2010-05-03 00:24:34 stipend 75
2010-05-02 00:25:25 stipend 75
2010-05-01 00:56:06 stipend 75
2010-04-30 00:27:55 stipend 75
2010-04-29 00:28:39 stipend 75
2010-04-28 00:29:59 stipend 75
2010-04-27 00:32:17 stipend 75
2010-04-26 00:33:09 stipend 75
2010-04-25 00:32:02 stipend 75
2010-04-24 00:30:43 stipend 75
2010-04-23 00:33:19 stipend 75
2010-04-22 00:36:36 stipend 75
2010-04-21 00:33:31 stipend 75
2010-04-20 00:38:48 stipend 75
2010-04-19 00:37:11 stipend 75
2010-04-18 00:41:19 stipend 75
2010-04-17 00:41:39 stipend 75
2010-04-16 00:41:07 stipend 75
2010-04-15 00:41:57 stipend 75
2010-04-14 00:41:37 stipend 75
2010-04-13 00:40:47 stipend 75
2010-04-12 00:43:38 stipend 75
2010-04-11 00:44:06 stipend 75
2010-04-10 00:42:28 stipend 75
2010-04-09 00:36:37 stipend 75
2010-04-08 00:41:54 stipend 75
2010-04-07 00:37:03 stipend 75
2010-04-06 00:33:02 stipend 75
2010-04-05 00:33:26 stipend 75
2010-04-04 00:33:12 stipend 75
2010-04-03 00:37:38 stipend 75
2010-04-02 00:34:11 stipend 75
2010-04-01 00:34:10 stipend 75
2010-03-31 00:40:36 stipend 75
2010-03-30 00:34:44 stipend 75
2010-03-29 00:51:17 stipend 75
2010-03-28 00:19:07 stipend 75
2010-03-27 00:17:27 stipend 75
2010-03-26 00:19:15 stipend 75
2010-03-25 00:16:03 stipend 75
2010-03-24 00:14:59 stipend 75
2010-03-23 00:15:47 stipend 75
2010-03-22 00:15:07 stipend 75
2010-03-21 08:35:26 stipend 75
2010-03-20 03:27:20 stipend 75
2010-03-19 00:27:41 stipend 75
2010-03-18 00:23:46 stipend 75
2010-03-17 00:22:26 stipend 75
2010-03-16 00:23:31 stipend 75
2010-03-15 00:22:10 stipend 75
2010-03-14 00:25:00 stipend 75
2010-03-13 00:24:27 stipend 75
2010-03-12 00:27:12 stipend 75
2010-03-11 00:28:31 stipend 75
2010-03-10 00:19:46 stipend 75
2010-03-09 00:18:53 stipend 75
2010-03-08 00:18:56 stipend 75
2010-03-07 00:20:34 stipend 75
2010-03-06 00:20:36 stipend 75
2010-03-05 00:21:52 stipend 75
2010-03-04 00:21:36 stipend 75
2010-03-03 00:23:09 stipend 75
2010-03-02 00:24:06 stipend 75
2010-03-01 00:22:03 stipend 75
2010-02-28 00:23:45 stipend 75
2010-02-27 00:25:19 stipend 75
2010-02-26 00:24:47 stipend 75
2010-02-25 00:25:58 stipend 75
2010-02-24 00:27:30 stipend 75
2010-02-23 00:27:06 stipend 75
2010-02-22 00:27:39 stipend 75
2010-02-21 00:31:22 stipend 75
2010-02-20 00:27:52 stipend 75
2010-02-19 00:28:09 stipend 75
2010-02-18 00:37:49 stipend 75
2010-02-17 00:35:52 stipend 75
2010-02-16 00:36:42 stipend 75
2010-02-15 00:35:20 stipend 75
2010-02-14 00:37:39 stipend 75
2010-02-13 00:35:37 stipend 75
2010-02-12 00:35:57 stipend 75
2010-02-11 00:34:27 stipend 75
2010-02-10 00:31:11 stipend 75
2010-02-09 00:26:07 stipend 75
2010-02-08 00:26:40 stipend 75
2010-02-07 00:30:11 stipend 75
2010-02-06 00:30:10 stipend 75
2010-02-05 00:30:20 stipend 75
2010-02-04 00:32:07 stipend 75
2010-02-03 00:31:31 stipend 75
2010-02-02 00:32:53 stipend 75
2010-02-01 00:33:52 stipend 75
2010-01-31 00:36:35 stipend 75
2010-01-30 04:14:05 stipend 75
2010-01-29 00:14:08 stipend 75
2010-01-28 00:14:19 stipend 75
2010-01-27 00:13:54 stipend 75
2010-01-26 00:14:22 stipend 75
2010-01-25 00:15:04 stipend 75
2010-01-24 00:13:30 stipend 75
2010-01-23 00:15:13 stipend 75
2010-01-22 00:12:58 stipend 75
2010-01-21 10:10:32 stipend 75
2010-01-20 00:18:32 stipend 75
2010-01-19 00:22:48 stipend 75
2010-01-18 00:22:20 stipend 75
2010-01-17 00:23:26 stipend 75
2010-01-16 00:23:23 stipend 75
2010-01-15 00:22:12 stipend 75
2010-01-14 00:24:09 stipend 75
2010-01-13 00:26:56 stipend 75
2010-01-12 00:29:43 stipend 75
2010-01-11 00:24:30 stipend 75
2010-01-10 00:18:13 stipend 75
2010-01-09 00:20:15 stipend 75
2010-01-08 00:19:37 stipend 75
2010-01-07 00:20:39 stipend 75
2010-01-06 00:19:43 stipend 75
2010-01-05 00:21:17 stipend 75
2010-01-04 00:22:07 stipend 75
2010-01-03 00:22:32 stipend 75
2010-01-02 00:22:03 stipend 75
2010-01-01 00:23:34 stipend 75
2009-12-31 00:22:19 stipend 75
2009-12-30 00:25:09 stipend 75
2009-12-29 00:27:44 stipend 75
2009-12-28 00:28:50 stipend 75
2009-12-27 00:28:35 stipend 75
2009-12-26 00:28:10 stipend 75
2009-12-25 00:29:13 stipend 75
2009-12-24 00:30:59 stipend 75
2009-12-23 00:31:31 stipend 75
2009-12-22 00:32:20 stipend 75
2009-12-21 00:32:57 stipend 75
2009-12-20 00:34:06 stipend 75
2009-12-19 00:35:49 stipend 75
2009-12-18 00:36:13 stipend 75
2009-12-17 00:38:11 stipend 75
2009-12-16 00:33:06 stipend 75
2009-12-15 00:33:07 stipend 75
2009-12-14 00:32:56 stipend 75
2009-12-13 00:30:05 stipend 75
2009-12-12 00:25:04 stipend 75
2009-12-11 00:30:46 stipend 75
2009-12-10 00:26:24 stipend 75
2009-12-09 00:25:12 stipend 75
2009-12-08 00:26:34 stipend 75
2009-12-07 00:22:47 stipend 75
2009-12-06 00:24:30 stipend 75
2009-12-05 00:30:52 stipend 75
2009-12-04 00:31:31 stipend 75
Edited by Sean Payton on Apr 14, 2014 22:26:34
Sean Payton
offline
offline
Originally posted by pabloex
Normally when someone starts a thread calling people names and immediately dropping the F-Bomb, it is a sign of a limited viewpoint and 99% of the time, the person won't be open minded enough to understand the larger picture or the perspective of others. Going to see if you happen to fall into the other 1%.
So here is the deal:
You own the team. You made 'roger1' the Head Coach. Did you have any interaction with him at all? What were your team forums like? For you to come in here and claim you have run great teams and made great players, to me it stands to reason that you would have been interested in the players on your team and wouldn't have just turned over recruiting without any input.
So, you may not be a multi and I for one will say I am sorry that I assumed you controlled the whole team but you are complicit in this deal no matter how vehemently you come in here to defend your good name. And what makes it more laughable is that having been involved in the running of GLB1 (as you claim) that you came in and allowed this to happen on a team you run.
You still have players on your team that are part of the multi issue. So you can play the part of the offended, innocent agent just here to have fun but I am gonna have to call BS on this show.
I bought a team and didn't feel like recruiting. Roger31 said he'd get the rest of the team filled after I made a few players. I never paid attention to who he filled it with nor did I really care.
Normally when someone starts a thread calling people names and immediately dropping the F-Bomb, it is a sign of a limited viewpoint and 99% of the time, the person won't be open minded enough to understand the larger picture or the perspective of others. Going to see if you happen to fall into the other 1%.
So here is the deal:
You own the team. You made 'roger1' the Head Coach. Did you have any interaction with him at all? What were your team forums like? For you to come in here and claim you have run great teams and made great players, to me it stands to reason that you would have been interested in the players on your team and wouldn't have just turned over recruiting without any input.
So, you may not be a multi and I for one will say I am sorry that I assumed you controlled the whole team but you are complicit in this deal no matter how vehemently you come in here to defend your good name. And what makes it more laughable is that having been involved in the running of GLB1 (as you claim) that you came in and allowed this to happen on a team you run.
You still have players on your team that are part of the multi issue. So you can play the part of the offended, innocent agent just here to have fun but I am gonna have to call BS on this show.
I bought a team and didn't feel like recruiting. Roger31 said he'd get the rest of the team filled after I made a few players. I never paid attention to who he filled it with nor did I really care.
stareagle
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sean Payton
I bought a team and didn't feel like recruiting. Roger31 said he'd get the rest of the team filled after I made a few players. I never paid attention to who he filled it with nor did I really care.
OK, there's a simple solution. Cut the 21 players on the roster that are still part of the multi issue, and replace them with CPU players or your own dots. Your season will still be tainted by Roger31's actions, obviously, but that would give you a legitimate team going forward.
I bought a team and didn't feel like recruiting. Roger31 said he'd get the rest of the team filled after I made a few players. I never paid attention to who he filled it with nor did I really care.
OK, there's a simple solution. Cut the 21 players on the roster that are still part of the multi issue, and replace them with CPU players or your own dots. Your season will still be tainted by Roger31's actions, obviously, but that would give you a legitimate team going forward.
12thKnight
offline
offline
Thank you for the insult to injury, Mr. Payton.
You do realize that the more you bleat about how experienced and gifted you are, the more you should have been wise to the fact that more than half your team was in violation of TOS? I mean, if half of the owners here could see it in blatant neon, you should have been the first to - especially as a former mod.
The right thing to do would have been to apologize to the rest of us and take your lumps. Incredibly, you just turned this whole fiasco into a smug, self-serving advertisement about how great you are. That is some Olympic level sociopathic behavior you've got going on over there.
What in the world are you thinking?
You do realize that the more you bleat about how experienced and gifted you are, the more you should have been wise to the fact that more than half your team was in violation of TOS? I mean, if half of the owners here could see it in blatant neon, you should have been the first to - especially as a former mod.
The right thing to do would have been to apologize to the rest of us and take your lumps. Incredibly, you just turned this whole fiasco into a smug, self-serving advertisement about how great you are. That is some Olympic level sociopathic behavior you've got going on over there.
What in the world are you thinking?
12thKnight
offline
offline
Originally posted by stareagle
OK, there's a simple solution. Cut the 21 players on the roster that are still part of the multi issue, and replace them with CPU players or your own dots. Your season will still be tainted by Roger31's actions, obviously, but that would give you a legitimate team going forward.
Problem is, GLB2 isn't GLB. He can just create more dots and go on his merry way with his garbage record intact.
Really, the answer here can only be taking his team to CPU and giving him a half-season timeout to let his ego deflate a little. There is no way this guy didn't know what was going on, which is why I suggested examining chat or emails in the first place. Anything less is a gigantic slap in the face to those of us who paid to play fair.
OK, there's a simple solution. Cut the 21 players on the roster that are still part of the multi issue, and replace them with CPU players or your own dots. Your season will still be tainted by Roger31's actions, obviously, but that would give you a legitimate team going forward.
Problem is, GLB2 isn't GLB. He can just create more dots and go on his merry way with his garbage record intact.
Really, the answer here can only be taking his team to CPU and giving him a half-season timeout to let his ego deflate a little. There is no way this guy didn't know what was going on, which is why I suggested examining chat or emails in the first place. Anything less is a gigantic slap in the face to those of us who paid to play fair.
Sean Payton
offline
offline
Originally posted by 12thKnight
Thank you for the insult to injury, Mr. Payton.
You do realize that the more you bleat about how experienced and gifted you are, the more you should have been wise to the fact that more than half your team was in violation of TOS? I mean, if half of the owners here could see it in blatant neon, you should have been the first to - especially as a former mod.
The right thing to do would have been to apologize to the rest of us and take your lumps. Incredibly, you just turned this whole fiasco into a smug, self-serving advertisement about how great you are. That is some Olympic level sociopathic behavior you've got going on over there.
What in the world are you thinking?
I never even looked at the roster. I'm going through cutting players that are banned and creating players to replace them to fix this crap.
Thank you for the insult to injury, Mr. Payton.
You do realize that the more you bleat about how experienced and gifted you are, the more you should have been wise to the fact that more than half your team was in violation of TOS? I mean, if half of the owners here could see it in blatant neon, you should have been the first to - especially as a former mod.
The right thing to do would have been to apologize to the rest of us and take your lumps. Incredibly, you just turned this whole fiasco into a smug, self-serving advertisement about how great you are. That is some Olympic level sociopathic behavior you've got going on over there.
What in the world are you thinking?
I never even looked at the roster. I'm going through cutting players that are banned and creating players to replace them to fix this crap.
12thKnight
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sean Payton
I never even looked at the roster. I'm going through cutting players that are banned and creating players to replace them to fix this crap.
You're this Godlike coach but you never looked at your OWN roster much less gameplanned against everyone else's?
Dude, my BS meter just pinned to the right. Come on, man. The innocent act is garbage. Give it up.
I never even looked at the roster. I'm going through cutting players that are banned and creating players to replace them to fix this crap.
You're this Godlike coach but you never looked at your OWN roster much less gameplanned against everyone else's?
Dude, my BS meter just pinned to the right. Come on, man. The innocent act is garbage. Give it up.
Sean Payton
offline
offline
Originally posted by 12thKnight
You're this Godlike coach but you never looked at your OWN roster much less gameplanned against everyone else's?
Dude, my BS meter just pinned to the right. Come on, man. The innocent act is garbage. Give it up.
I didn't really care about my roster, I just wanted to build a few players. I left running the team up roger31 who obviously screwed me over.
You're this Godlike coach but you never looked at your OWN roster much less gameplanned against everyone else's?
Dude, my BS meter just pinned to the right. Come on, man. The innocent act is garbage. Give it up.
I didn't really care about my roster, I just wanted to build a few players. I left running the team up roger31 who obviously screwed me over.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
