Okay, here's the physics...
From 0 forward motion (ie. my feet stop moving and I just fall forward).
This scenario is easy as my body can basically be considered a 73" long lever and the ball will touch down at a distance forward that is directly equal to the height I'm carrying the ball tucked up near my armpit, so 60". That 60" translates to 1.6 yd.
From an average 8 second 40 time (ie. dragging someone so you'll start faster and finish slower than that 8 seconds, but what matters is the average)
This scenario has me moving forward 5 yards every second. Now, let's say I'm dragging someone and leaning forward when I make my dive so instead of the ball being at 60" off the ground, it's down at 36". Note: I'll still be extending to my full length as I fall, and since my feet are still the fulcrum point of this dive, I'll still get the 1.6 yrds + whatever distance I travel in the air.
Here's where everybody in this thread arguing you can'd dive carrying someone is getting it wrong. No matter how much weight I have on my back, I'm going to fall at exactly the same 19.8ft/s^2.
So, doing the math from 36", it works out that I'll be airborn ~.4 seconds. Using my forward velocity of 5 yards per second I will be able to travel 2 yards in the air. Add in my 1.6 yards from extending as I lunge forward, and we'd have me travelling about 3.5 yards.
And again, it doesn't matter at all how many people I'm carrying on my back. All that matters is my average forward velocity and the height where I'm airborn. I also assumed that I'd have no ability at all to generate any upward acceleration because I'm not going to get into an argument about how much power I could generate in my legs although in reality, I could in fact generate some upward burst motion which would in fact get me above 36" for my dive height.
From 0 forward motion (ie. my feet stop moving and I just fall forward).
This scenario is easy as my body can basically be considered a 73" long lever and the ball will touch down at a distance forward that is directly equal to the height I'm carrying the ball tucked up near my armpit, so 60". That 60" translates to 1.6 yd.
From an average 8 second 40 time (ie. dragging someone so you'll start faster and finish slower than that 8 seconds, but what matters is the average)
This scenario has me moving forward 5 yards every second. Now, let's say I'm dragging someone and leaning forward when I make my dive so instead of the ball being at 60" off the ground, it's down at 36". Note: I'll still be extending to my full length as I fall, and since my feet are still the fulcrum point of this dive, I'll still get the 1.6 yrds + whatever distance I travel in the air.
Here's where everybody in this thread arguing you can'd dive carrying someone is getting it wrong. No matter how much weight I have on my back, I'm going to fall at exactly the same 19.8ft/s^2.
So, doing the math from 36", it works out that I'll be airborn ~.4 seconds. Using my forward velocity of 5 yards per second I will be able to travel 2 yards in the air. Add in my 1.6 yards from extending as I lunge forward, and we'd have me travelling about 3.5 yards.
And again, it doesn't matter at all how many people I'm carrying on my back. All that matters is my average forward velocity and the height where I'm airborn. I also assumed that I'd have no ability at all to generate any upward acceleration because I'm not going to get into an argument about how much power I could generate in my legs although in reality, I could in fact generate some upward burst motion which would in fact get me above 36" for my dive height.






























