Originally posted by Butler053
can you open your build?
Should be open now.
can you open your build?
Should be open now.
Forum > Disbanded League Forums > Europa League > are you on a inactive team and want to be on a active team from this league next season then....
3ebfan511
offline
offline
Its sad, but I find that sometimes my players are better utilized by CPU teams. Real owners make dumb decisions like demanding you "open the build" or other stupid stuff. On CPU teams my guys are often put 1st string, because they are the best, and I don't need to worry about having new coaches/ coordinators coming in wanting to know this and that or not believing that my build is good etc.
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
Edited by 3ebfan511 on Mar 9, 2014 01:41:45
Mr.Chisel
offline
offline
Originally posted by 3ebfan511
Its sad, but I find that sometimes my players are better utilized by CPU teams. Real owners make dumb decisions like demanding you "open the build" or other stupid stuff. On CPU teams my guys are often put 1st string, because they are the best, and I don't need to worry about having new coaches/ coordinators coming in wanting to know this and that or not believing that my build is good etc.
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
Having your guys play for a CPU team is like working for minimum wage. Yes, you may get more playing time but once the postseason gets here those garbage CPU teams will be watching from the couch. I play to win Championships (big money), not to play a few minutes extra during the season. Have fun being the best on the worst teams.
The NFL Combine is basically teams asking to see their "build"
Its sad, but I find that sometimes my players are better utilized by CPU teams. Real owners make dumb decisions like demanding you "open the build" or other stupid stuff. On CPU teams my guys are often put 1st string, because they are the best, and I don't need to worry about having new coaches/ coordinators coming in wanting to know this and that or not believing that my build is good etc.
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
Having your guys play for a CPU team is like working for minimum wage. Yes, you may get more playing time but once the postseason gets here those garbage CPU teams will be watching from the couch. I play to win Championships (big money), not to play a few minutes extra during the season. Have fun being the best on the worst teams.
The NFL Combine is basically teams asking to see their "build"
Edited by Mr.Chisel on Mar 9, 2014 05:39:25
3ebfan511
offline
offline
Hey genius, I am on one of your human teams with you lol....and I see the team forum where you are constantly trying to figure out why your WR sucks and cant hold on to the ball.
And at least 1 CPU team I am on the team has a strong winning record, they split reps with 4 different running backs, (would never happen with a human team since they would bow to complaints and/or favor one over the other etc.)
Also, my RB is listed as #1 starter despite there being 4 backs, and is also the #1 Punt Returner and Kick Returner, again despite there being 4 backs to split the ball with, and hes in the running for special teams MVP, and the team has a strong winning record. That would never happen on a human team because they would just use 1 o2 backs, probably wouldnt even carry 4 backs, let alone get them the ball equally. This team has the best run game in the whole league pretty much and a great record..and its a CPU run team.
Your post is more proof. Keep working on your WR lol...my guys dominate on CPU and non-CPU teams alike. (I have a WR on a non-CPU dominating. Just making a point that CPU teams are sometimes more well run then human teams because you take human error and stupidity out of the equation. Its by far better run than the team where the owner has been awol for 3 weeks.)
And at least 1 CPU team I am on the team has a strong winning record, they split reps with 4 different running backs, (would never happen with a human team since they would bow to complaints and/or favor one over the other etc.)
Also, my RB is listed as #1 starter despite there being 4 backs, and is also the #1 Punt Returner and Kick Returner, again despite there being 4 backs to split the ball with, and hes in the running for special teams MVP, and the team has a strong winning record. That would never happen on a human team because they would just use 1 o2 backs, probably wouldnt even carry 4 backs, let alone get them the ball equally. This team has the best run game in the whole league pretty much and a great record..and its a CPU run team.
Your post is more proof. Keep working on your WR lol...my guys dominate on CPU and non-CPU teams alike. (I have a WR on a non-CPU dominating. Just making a point that CPU teams are sometimes more well run then human teams because you take human error and stupidity out of the equation. Its by far better run than the team where the owner has been awol for 3 weeks.)
Mr.Chisel
offline
offline
Jeez walrus face, didn't mean to raise you blood pressure. Like I said I don't care about stats and my guy has had the least drops on the team on avg. Take a look at my guys and you'll see that the team you are referring to is the only team I am on that won't be in the playoffs. Like I said I play to win championships. It seems you play for stats for yourself or just play with yourself in general.
I looked at your dominate WR thinking he never drops passes but mine has 1 per game and is improving and yours ha 31 drops in 24 games. Plus only 6 TD's in those games. I wouldn't mention drops if your player has a worse case. Your worse than the kettle
I looked at your dominate WR thinking he never drops passes but mine has 1 per game and is improving and yours ha 31 drops in 24 games. Plus only 6 TD's in those games. I wouldn't mention drops if your player has a worse case. Your worse than the kettle
Edited by Mr.Chisel on Mar 10, 2014 00:40:45
3ebfan511
offline
offline
I dont know what you are looking at but my WR is one of the top 5 in his whole league, and has like 1200+ yards and is DOMINATING.
He probably has more drops because he has tougher catches to make, like in traffic, while covered, double covered, and STILL comes up with the ball almost ALL THE TIME. There is no comparison. Your dude is probably some small fast scrub that cant catch or do anything. I will laugh if I even look at his profile again. Keep working on stuff, maybe he will be half as good as Cornerback Killer someday.
He probably has more drops because he has tougher catches to make, like in traffic, while covered, double covered, and STILL comes up with the ball almost ALL THE TIME. There is no comparison. Your dude is probably some small fast scrub that cant catch or do anything. I will laugh if I even look at his profile again. Keep working on stuff, maybe he will be half as good as Cornerback Killer someday.
3ebfan511
offline
offline
wow, OK, this is just sad. Your guy DROPS THE BALL MORE THEN MINE. So the only argument you had SUCKS TOO. Your dude 6 dropped passes on 26 targets...thats more then 1 out of evey 5 passes he sees he drops. My dude...160 targets...31 drops or so...thats LESS than 1 drop every 5 passes...and obviously just dominating in numbers compared to whatever it is you are calling a WR there.
26 targets for 194 yards....compared to like 160 targets for 1200+ yards...and your guys drops the ball at a higher rate...brilliant. This again proves my point in the initial post..
26 targets for 194 yards....compared to like 160 targets for 1200+ yards...and your guys drops the ball at a higher rate...brilliant. This again proves my point in the initial post..
Mr.Chisel
offline
offline
Originally posted by 3ebfan511
wow, OK, this is just sad. Your guy DROPS THE BALL MORE THEN MINE. So the only argument you had SUCKS TOO. Your dude 6 dropped passes on 26 targets...thats more then 1 out of evey 5 passes he sees he drops. My dude...160 targets...31 drops or so...thats LESS than 1 drop every 5 passes...and obviously just dominating in numbers compared to whatever it is you are calling a WR there.
26 targets for 194 yards....compared to like 160 targets for 1200+ yards...and your guys drops the ball at a higher rate...brilliant. This again proves my point in the initial post..
I never made claims that I had a "dominate WR", that was you, so your last posts are silly. Like I said prev. I play to make the playoffs and hopefully win a championship. I'm a friendly guy who enjoys talking back and forth with my teammates and coaches so i prefer the human managed teams. If you don't enjoy the social interaction than CPU teams are perfect for you. I'm sorry that you got offended by my initial post but unfortunately I must move on because you and I have raped this recruiting thread with gibberish.
wow, OK, this is just sad. Your guy DROPS THE BALL MORE THEN MINE. So the only argument you had SUCKS TOO. Your dude 6 dropped passes on 26 targets...thats more then 1 out of evey 5 passes he sees he drops. My dude...160 targets...31 drops or so...thats LESS than 1 drop every 5 passes...and obviously just dominating in numbers compared to whatever it is you are calling a WR there.
26 targets for 194 yards....compared to like 160 targets for 1200+ yards...and your guys drops the ball at a higher rate...brilliant. This again proves my point in the initial post..
I never made claims that I had a "dominate WR", that was you, so your last posts are silly. Like I said prev. I play to make the playoffs and hopefully win a championship. I'm a friendly guy who enjoys talking back and forth with my teammates and coaches so i prefer the human managed teams. If you don't enjoy the social interaction than CPU teams are perfect for you. I'm sorry that you got offended by my initial post but unfortunately I must move on because you and I have raped this recruiting thread with gibberish.
Mr.Chisel
offline
offline
Originally posted by Motiak
I think you lose by default by not being able to spell dominant.
Thanks Motiak! That's why I play this instead of pursuing my dreams as a "dominate" (enjoy my typo) Spelling Bee World Competitor. I wasn't trying to win or lose. I just wanted him to understand that of course coaches ask to see your build. It's important if they are looking for a certain type of player. I would think you as a coach would understand. I mean no harm to anyone, unless you play my defensive players. I'm just here for a good time. You may want to keep track of my posts because I promise to make many more grammatical errors.
Also "3ebfan511", if you have a lock on receiving build why don't you help your team out. If you see us struggling on offense it'd be nice to help out since we are on the same team. I don't care if you bash my players but after the verbal assault you could give us guidance to help your team win. I promise to play nice. I just want wins.
I think you lose by default by not being able to spell dominant.
Thanks Motiak! That's why I play this instead of pursuing my dreams as a "dominate" (enjoy my typo) Spelling Bee World Competitor. I wasn't trying to win or lose. I just wanted him to understand that of course coaches ask to see your build. It's important if they are looking for a certain type of player. I would think you as a coach would understand. I mean no harm to anyone, unless you play my defensive players. I'm just here for a good time. You may want to keep track of my posts because I promise to make many more grammatical errors.
Also "3ebfan511", if you have a lock on receiving build why don't you help your team out. If you see us struggling on offense it'd be nice to help out since we are on the same team. I don't care if you bash my players but after the verbal assault you could give us guidance to help your team win. I promise to play nice. I just want wins.
Edited by Mr.Chisel on Mar 10, 2014 09:32:13
3ebfan511
offline
offline
Your the one that bashed me genius. Never said one negative thing about your guy on the team forum...because I feel bad and stuff. Never said anything about your or your player until you bashed me on here first lol
You have much to learn...dumb insults do not help.
You have much to learn...dumb insults do not help.
Butler053
offline
offline
Originally posted by 3ebfan511
Its sad, but I find that sometimes my players are better utilized by CPU teams. Real owners make dumb decisions like demanding you "open the build" or other stupid stuff. On CPU teams my guys are often put 1st string, because they are the best, and I don't need to worry about having new coaches/ coordinators coming in wanting to know this and that or not believing that my build is good etc.
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
You have one player on a CPU team (jerome bettis) and he is getting 3 carries per game... I don't believe that puts him 1st string. You aren't currently coaching any teams so I don't believe you understand the advantage a coach can get by knowing what each player on his roster is capable of. Also if your HB was only getting 3 carries per game on a human controlled team you could at least have someone to voice your concerns to. I agree that not all owners / coaches are great and to be honest it is very hard to game-plan "blind" without knowing each players strengths and weaknesses. By not opening your build you are inadvertently hurting your team and possibly your own players stats. In my experience (I'm no pro) coaches aren't asking you to open your build because they don't trust that you have a great player, it really is more for game planing and putting your player in a position to succeed.
Its sad, but I find that sometimes my players are better utilized by CPU teams. Real owners make dumb decisions like demanding you "open the build" or other stupid stuff. On CPU teams my guys are often put 1st string, because they are the best, and I don't need to worry about having new coaches/ coordinators coming in wanting to know this and that or not believing that my build is good etc.
I would like to go up to an NFL player and ask him "Can you open your build ?"
You have one player on a CPU team (jerome bettis) and he is getting 3 carries per game... I don't believe that puts him 1st string. You aren't currently coaching any teams so I don't believe you understand the advantage a coach can get by knowing what each player on his roster is capable of. Also if your HB was only getting 3 carries per game on a human controlled team you could at least have someone to voice your concerns to. I agree that not all owners / coaches are great and to be honest it is very hard to game-plan "blind" without knowing each players strengths and weaknesses. By not opening your build you are inadvertently hurting your team and possibly your own players stats. In my experience (I'm no pro) coaches aren't asking you to open your build because they don't trust that you have a great player, it really is more for game planing and putting your player in a position to succeed.
3ebfan511
offline
offline
Thats wonderful Butler 053, but uh look at his team page, and look who the starter is. Its my guy. Look who the starter is on PR, look who the starter is on KR...MY GUY. on all 3...and yet theres 4 backs and the CPU knows my guy is best. I dont need to worry about some dumb inquisition by a clueless owner or coach. Most owners are fine though with having a good player, its just in some cases some owners were stupid and would take it personally or something, or who knows what.
GLB2 is way better in that regard with more complicated builds so you cant just copy and paste as easily and the builds are now closed by default, instead of open by default so people arent copying and pasting as much and actually, (I hope) learning how to build good builds themselves.
Bottom line is. You now have the combine numbers right there, that plus game film means anyone with half a brain cell should be able to know what a player is good at or not. If you need to see my build to know what my player can do, it means you don't know much.
You don't go up to Calvin Johnson and ask him if he should be playing Linebacker. Its pretty obvious. If you ask him that you are a moron, and by asking to see my builds I feel the same way.
So, fortunately GLB2 is way way better in that regard, and you dont even need to see builds, with the combine numbers, if you actually know what you are doing.
GLB2 is way better in that regard with more complicated builds so you cant just copy and paste as easily and the builds are now closed by default, instead of open by default so people arent copying and pasting as much and actually, (I hope) learning how to build good builds themselves.
Bottom line is. You now have the combine numbers right there, that plus game film means anyone with half a brain cell should be able to know what a player is good at or not. If you need to see my build to know what my player can do, it means you don't know much.
You don't go up to Calvin Johnson and ask him if he should be playing Linebacker. Its pretty obvious. If you ask him that you are a moron, and by asking to see my builds I feel the same way.
So, fortunately GLB2 is way way better in that regard, and you dont even need to see builds, with the combine numbers, if you actually know what you are doing.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
