Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Now this I agree 100%, however OP seems to want a coverage focused joe.

fast and not be fooled isnt really coverage joe.

i agree too much speed makes the CBs look terrible, but they already suck so might as well buff em up to help stop sweeps.

i also like to have them shoot of the edge once in a while. i guess it all matters who is the DC tbh.

True,

OP can you identify more clearly what type of CB you intend on making?

Originally posted by Jampy2.0

when the better WRs in the game don't even have speed that high,

sure they do.

Originally posted by bhall43
sure they do.

Not the ones I consider the better WRs.

6 of the top 10 HoF WR's have 40+ speed.

Originally posted by bhall43
6 of the top 10 HoF WR's have 40+ speed.

I don't really use HOF to determine the best....

that is weird because they are part of the best passing offenses right now?

Ya I would probably use guys that aren't part of good passing offenses to judge too.

Originally posted by bhall43
that is weird because they are part of the best passing offenses right now?

Part of offenses that pass to them the most.

So SF's Wide Receivers aren't very good?

Heck all the guys in that top 10 are the best pass catchers on good teams. lolu

Then again you keep complaining about your offense sucking so that makes a lot of sense why you wouldn't know much about good offense builds.

Originally posted by bhall43
So SF's Wide Receivers aren't very good?

if homage built them, no. that dude sucks.

Originally posted by bhall43
So SF's Wide Receivers aren't very good?

This isn't about SF.

Originally posted by bhall43
Then again you keep complaining about your offense sucking so that makes a lot of sense why you wouldn't know much about good offense builds.

Probs cuz I just dove in.. I'm not giving you the satisfaction of complimenting SF and your passing attack, because tbh the game break is at the point where all the pass only teams are just lame.

But like I said, I don't really use HOF as the end all measure of success.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
This isn't about SF

Well 3 of the top 10 are SF WR's so it kinda is. And they all have above 40 speed.



Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Probs cuz I just dove in.. I'm not giving you the satisfaction of complimenting SF and your passing attack, because tbh the game break is at the point where all the pass only teams are just lame.

But like I said, I don't really use HOF as the end all measure of success.

It isn't anything to do with complimenting the SF passing attack. They are good. That all there is to it. As are the other WR's with above 40 speed in that top tier.

Here is what I find lame as long as we are talking about it. The fact that people think what I do is lame. What is so lame about it? How many times do I have to run the ball in a game to not be lame? Does 100+ yards rushing and 400+ yards passing constitute as lame? Do I have to use certain plays that don't suck in order to not be lame? I really don't quite get it.

What's more is that people call it a gimmick. lol...yet they look at a team like Doinitin and say that they are doing something impressive. I applaud Doinitin too don't get me wrong. They do the same things I would do in their position. (that I do as well actually) But their plan is no less gimmicky than mine.

You take the plays you excel at and put the plan together. My teams don't excel truly because they pass 60+ times a game and can't be stopped. There is a strategy in place if you watch the game and know what you are looking at. The good coordinators know what I am talking about.