cocks are all for it if we can agree to it
ManOgwaR
offline
offline
I've had some fun trying new ideas with CEQs and using them to try go in new directions with my builds ...I think that it helps to give teams their own uniqueness and/or edge ...it also helps to maintain the difference between the elite and the average imo with 'cookie cutter builds', etc ...sure builds are a big part of success, but it still not easy to get the formula right ...I think that CEQs are another part of the formula to keep in PWG tbh and $42.50 per team per season isn't a huge price to pay for peace of mind about whether other teams are using them or not ...it could help to revitalize peewee!
Edited by ManOgwaR on Dec 24, 2013 23:35:25
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ahrens858
cocks are all for it if we can agree to it
Jboro Redbirds are doing it regardless of the rest, but I think it would be fun to see.
cocks are all for it if we can agree to it
Jboro Redbirds are doing it regardless of the rest, but I think it would be fun to see.
Kelts
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ahrens858
No doubt it would be alot more competitive. Most people probably couldnt do much with a no no team outside of a couple of the pwg elite group with other teams boosting.
Yea some cant do it boosted either..
No doubt it would be alot more competitive. Most people probably couldnt do much with a no no team outside of a couple of the pwg elite group with other teams boosting.
Yea some cant do it boosted either..
Stixx
offline
offline
Originally posted by ManOgwaR
I've had some fun trying new ideas with CEQs and using them to try go in new directions with my builds ...I think that it helps to give teams their own uniqueness and/or edge ...it also helps to maintain the difference between the elite and the average imo with 'cookie cutter builds', etc ...sure builds are a big part of success, but it still not easy to get the formula right ...I think that CEQs are another part of the formula to keep in PWG tbh and $42.50 per team per season isn't a huge price to pay for peace of mind about whether other teams are using them or not ...it could help to revitalize peewee!
For some reason I've never really thought CEQ actually gives you the +6 bonus it's supposed to. Bmac and I never bought CEQ on SoA back in the day and we managed to play in two PWG championships. I mean you would obviously think it would work if you have to spend 5k flex per team but who knows..
I've had some fun trying new ideas with CEQs and using them to try go in new directions with my builds ...I think that it helps to give teams their own uniqueness and/or edge ...it also helps to maintain the difference between the elite and the average imo with 'cookie cutter builds', etc ...sure builds are a big part of success, but it still not easy to get the formula right ...I think that CEQs are another part of the formula to keep in PWG tbh and $42.50 per team per season isn't a huge price to pay for peace of mind about whether other teams are using them or not ...it could help to revitalize peewee!
For some reason I've never really thought CEQ actually gives you the +6 bonus it's supposed to. Bmac and I never bought CEQ on SoA back in the day and we managed to play in two PWG championships. I mean you would obviously think it would work if you have to spend 5k flex per team but who knows..
LordEvil
offline
offline
Originally posted by Honey Badger
For some reason I've never really thought CEQ actually gives you the +6 bonus it's supposed to. Bmac and I never bought CEQ on SoA back in the day and we managed to play in two PWG championships. I mean you would obviously think it would work if you have to spend 5k flex per team but who knows..
+6 and then the +5 in the tree so 11 basically. It's 5500 per team, still expensive. Id like to see 32 complete no/no teams for a cost of 400 per team. Now that's a bargain!
For some reason I've never really thought CEQ actually gives you the +6 bonus it's supposed to. Bmac and I never bought CEQ on SoA back in the day and we managed to play in two PWG championships. I mean you would obviously think it would work if you have to spend 5k flex per team but who knows..
+6 and then the +5 in the tree so 11 basically. It's 5500 per team, still expensive. Id like to see 32 complete no/no teams for a cost of 400 per team. Now that's a bargain!
Originally posted by LordEvil
+6 and then the +5 in the tree so 11 basically. It's 5500 per team, still expensive. Id like to see 32 complete no/no teams for a cost of 400 per team. Now that's a bargain!
That sounds too good >_>
+6 and then the +5 in the tree so 11 basically. It's 5500 per team, still expensive. Id like to see 32 complete no/no teams for a cost of 400 per team. Now that's a bargain!
That sounds too good >_>
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by JBStar23
That sounds too good >_>
That is what my squad is doing!
That sounds too good >_>
That is what my squad is doing!
ManOgwaR
offline
offline
hmm well itsply has been doing alright at 400 per season ...I bet he'd be licking his lips at the thought of every other team coming down to his level ...lol we may as well crown him now 
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by ManOgwaR
hmm well itsply has been doing alright at 400 per season ...I bet he'd be licking his lips at the thought of every other team coming down to his level ...lol we may as well crown him now
itsply is a great no/no agent, but that doesn't mean the rest of us stink. I think we would all still put forth solid squads.
I think the Redbirds will still be decent, although not at the same level.
hmm well itsply has been doing alright at 400 per season ...I bet he'd be licking his lips at the thought of every other team coming down to his level ...lol we may as well crown him now
itsply is a great no/no agent, but that doesn't mean the rest of us stink. I think we would all still put forth solid squads.
I think the Redbirds will still be decent, although not at the same level.
ManOgwaR
offline
offline
...but it would still take time to find the right formula and itsply is already well advanced at that ...to make up for CEQs and a 3lvl disadvantage to continually make the playoffs over however many seasons that he has done it for up until now is an extraordinary effort and should be an ominous warning to the rest of the league should we all go in that direction ...I would gladly welcome the challenge! ...but I think that the ninja CEQrs will spoil it
Edited by ManOgwaR on Dec 25, 2013 17:01:01
Edited by ManOgwaR on Dec 25, 2013 16:33:54
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by ManOgwaR
...but it would still take time to find the right formula and itsply is already well advanced at that ...to make up for CEQs and a 3lvl disadvantage to continually make the playoffs over however many seasons that he has done it for up until now is an extroadinary effort and should be an ominous warning to the rest of the league should we all go in that direction ...I would gladly welcome the challenge! ...but I think that the ninja CEQrs will spoil it
You are probably correct. itsply deserves a huge pat on the back for being super successful as a no/no.
...but it would still take time to find the right formula and itsply is already well advanced at that ...to make up for CEQs and a 3lvl disadvantage to continually make the playoffs over however many seasons that he has done it for up until now is an extroadinary effort and should be an ominous warning to the rest of the league should we all go in that direction ...I would gladly welcome the challenge! ...but I think that the ninja CEQrs will spoil it
You are probably correct. itsply deserves a huge pat on the back for being super successful as a no/no.
bryceps2
offline
offline
OSIRIS and I have gone No/No for several seasons. Would be nice if more teams joined us. I think we were full Yes/Yes once in the past 10 seasons.
andersonba1210
offline
offline
Originally posted by bryceps2
OSIRIS and I have gone No/No for several seasons. Would be nice if more teams joined us. I think we were full Yes/Yes once in the past 10 seasons.
Well your squad will be in gold next season. So your team, plus mine as well as Subversive is at least 3 no/no teams.
Maybe we will inspire more to join us!
OSIRIS and I have gone No/No for several seasons. Would be nice if more teams joined us. I think we were full Yes/Yes once in the past 10 seasons.
Well your squad will be in gold next season. So your team, plus mine as well as Subversive is at least 3 no/no teams.
Maybe we will inspire more to join us!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
