Lord Brady is good that is for sure. I am glad we could pick him off 3 times though 
Mattarchy
offline
offline
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by rhavec
Originally posted by Mattarchy
Rob Eversleigh.
hahahahaha
We can all agree with that sentiment.
Originally posted by rhavec
Originally posted by Mattarchy
Rob Eversleigh.
hahahahaha
We can all agree with that sentiment.
BucJordan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lout84
Lord Brady is good that is for sure. I am glad we could pick him off 3 times though
I was more impressed with the Longhorn's receivers than Brady. He only completed like 44% of his passes but once a WR caught a ball he was off to the end zone....excellent blend of speed and power with those receivers.
Lord Brady is good that is for sure. I am glad we could pick him off 3 times though
I was more impressed with the Longhorn's receivers than Brady. He only completed like 44% of his passes but once a WR caught a ball he was off to the end zone....excellent blend of speed and power with those receivers.
lc512
offline
offline
Originally posted by BucJordan
Originally posted by Lout84
Lord Brady is good that is for sure. I am glad we could pick him off 3 times though
I was more impressed with the Longhorn's receivers than Brady. He only completed like 44% of his passes but once a WR caught a ball he was off to the end zone....excellent blend of speed and power with those receivers.
We have great receivers, for sure. Brady had his worst day since like week 2 of last season against the Panthers, though, and still had 300+ yards and 4 TDs. He's 2nd in the league in touchdowns and 2nd in the league in passing, and he's got far less picks than the guy who has more (Baugh who is a mediocre QB on a pass happy team). 97 QB rating, 20 TD to 7 INT.
CG Smith (the DE I was talking about) is a viable choice too. Don't know enough about the East to name anyone from over there.
Originally posted by Lout84
Lord Brady is good that is for sure. I am glad we could pick him off 3 times though
I was more impressed with the Longhorn's receivers than Brady. He only completed like 44% of his passes but once a WR caught a ball he was off to the end zone....excellent blend of speed and power with those receivers.
We have great receivers, for sure. Brady had his worst day since like week 2 of last season against the Panthers, though, and still had 300+ yards and 4 TDs. He's 2nd in the league in touchdowns and 2nd in the league in passing, and he's got far less picks than the guy who has more (Baugh who is a mediocre QB on a pass happy team). 97 QB rating, 20 TD to 7 INT.
CG Smith (the DE I was talking about) is a viable choice too. Don't know enough about the East to name anyone from over there.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Eli Cornelius Spiderpig (QB) of the Tricity Cardinals:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=94695
TD Parker (HB) of the Las Vegas Flyin' Elvis:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=30478
Dubious Maximus (WR) of the Colony 195 Defenders:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=46409
"Mahvelous" Marvin Hagler (DE) of the Tricity Cardinals:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=171194
Barry Larkin (CB) of the Las Vegas Flyin' Elvis:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=115534
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=94695
TD Parker (HB) of the Las Vegas Flyin' Elvis:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=30478
Dubious Maximus (WR) of the Colony 195 Defenders:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=46409
"Mahvelous" Marvin Hagler (DE) of the Tricity Cardinals:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=171194
Barry Larkin (CB) of the Las Vegas Flyin' Elvis:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=115534
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
Paul Kemp
offline
offline
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
lookoutrentacop
offline
offline
Originally posted by Paul Kemp
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
chronic23
offline
offline
Originally posted by rhavec
Originally posted by Mattarchy
Rob Eversleigh.
hahahahaha
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by
Bill Romanowski
Yeah, a linebacker on a terrible team that gets a bunch of tackles because the rest of the defense is awful.
It's Brady or the DE for Austin that has a shit ton of sacks.
Upset?
you upset your team sucks?
Originally posted by Mattarchy
Rob Eversleigh.
hahahahaha
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by
Bill Romanowski
Yeah, a linebacker on a terrible team that gets a bunch of tackles because the rest of the defense is awful.
It's Brady or the DE for Austin that has a shit ton of sacks.
Upset?
you upset your team sucks?
lc512
offline
offline
Originally posted by Viking184
Originally posted by Paul Kemp
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
If Austin or Fortaleza got to play that Buffalo team, the leaderboards would be nothing but players from our two teams. Just saying.
Originally posted by Paul Kemp
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
If Austin or Fortaleza got to play that Buffalo team, the leaderboards would be nothing but players from our two teams. Just saying.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by Viking184
Originally posted by Paul Kemp
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
If Austin or Fortaleza got to play that Buffalo team, the leaderboards would be nothing but players from our two teams. Just saying.
I was about to point that out myself. The West's lower tier is a lot better than the "other" conference's lower tier.
Originally posted by Viking184
Originally posted by Paul Kemp
Originally posted by Iceman16
Show the East some love. They've got a lot of good players too.
What is this East you speak of?
Well, they have 5/10 passing leaders.
6/10 top passing touchdowns leaders
7/10 top receiving touchdowns leaders
5/10 top rushing touchdowns leaders
5/10 top receiving leaders (4 in the top 5)
4/10 top rushing leaders
8/10 top sack leaders
7/10 top hurries leaders
7/10 top interception leaders
5/10 top tackles leaders
6/10 top forced fumbles leaders
6/10 top field goals made leaders
8/10 top pancakes leaders
Any questions?
If Austin or Fortaleza got to play that Buffalo team, the leaderboards would be nothing but players from our two teams. Just saying.
I was about to point that out myself. The West's lower tier is a lot better than the "other" conference's lower tier.
lc512
offline
offline
Originally posted by Former
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Former
offline
offline
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by Former
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Ok good then we are on the same page.
First off I don't even know why people are mentioning seasonal awards in week 8. Are we that impatient that we can't just wait until the end of the regular season or at least week 12?
If you want to do something a slightly more productive, why not do a player of the week (Off/Def)?
Originally posted by Former
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Ok good then we are on the same page.
First off I don't even know why people are mentioning seasonal awards in week 8. Are we that impatient that we can't just wait until the end of the regular season or at least week 12?
If you want to do something a slightly more productive, why not do a player of the week (Off/Def)?
lc512
offline
offline
Originally posted by Former
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by Former
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Ok good then we are on the same page.
First off I don't even know why people are mentioning seasonal awards in week 8. Are we that impatient that we can't just wait until the end of the regular season or at least week 12?
If you want to do something a slightly more productive, why not do a player of the week (Off/Def)?
That would actually be pretty cool, but I'm not sure you could get a good amount of votes in every two days or whatever.
Originally posted by lc512
Originally posted by Former
Christ, the West is so full of themselves.
Not really. I think any of the top 4-5 teams in the East could give the top 4-5 teams in the West a run for their money. Nobody's saying that the top half of the East can't hang with the top half of the West. But the East has feasted on some teams that absolutely don't belong in the league.
Seriously, look at the leaderboard. The top two QBs (both East) had 6 and 7 touchdowns against Buffalo.
Buffalo has 3 players under level 10. I mean, level 8s. Come on, give me a break. The West's worst team's lowest player is a level 12, and is mostly level 14-15. Buffalo's average level is about a 10 or 11. That's pretty terrible.
Ok good then we are on the same page.
First off I don't even know why people are mentioning seasonal awards in week 8. Are we that impatient that we can't just wait until the end of the regular season or at least week 12?
If you want to do something a slightly more productive, why not do a player of the week (Off/Def)?
That would actually be pretty cool, but I'm not sure you could get a good amount of votes in every two days or whatever.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
