User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > would you guys rather a 15 game schedule?
Page:
 
Katarn2000x
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology

It's all part of playing in the big leagues.

No whining, and no excuses.


There's more whining and excuses here than anywhere else lol
 
Link
 
Sure, but how are you going to account for promos? The effects of overage accounts is long lasting
 
Link
 
17 team conferences. Solves the problem
 
ChicagoTRS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology

Besides...not everything in life is fair. Sometimes shit will happen to you, and sometimes the scheduling RNG will just up and @**-Fu** you.

It's all part of playing in the big leagues.

No whining, and no excuses.



+1 too bad if you miss the playoffs...try harder...
 
Bladnach
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology

Not terrible ideas, but I think the chances of Bort breaking the current league and schedule formats just for WL are somewhere very near 0%.



this
 
jdros13
offline
Link
 
the cross-conference game draw is one of the most important parts of the season....and definitely makes or breaks some seasons.

I think it should stay that way though personally, even though BDC has not been that successful in that week 1 game historically. If you are good enough to stay, you'll still find a way.
 
zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TrevJo
I think the tiebreaker system should at least consider conference record as the first tiebreaker


before actual record, yes I agree
 
jtserb
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdros13
the cross-conference game draw is one of the most important parts of the season....and definitely makes or breaks some seasons.

I think it should stay that way though personally, even though BDC has not been that successful in that week 1 game historically. If you are good enough to stay, you'll still find a way.


Just win more. We had D9 2 seasons in a row before this year, in which we got the Kai. Thank god we had a break this season.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by chronoaug
Originally posted by tautology


Not terrible ideas, but I think the chances of Bort breaking the current league and schedule formats just for WL are somewhere very near 0%.



this


i think they should poll the entire userbase and see what non-boosting pee wee owners think.
 
James Murphy
offline
Link
 
I read 1 and a half sentences.

I can haz cookie?
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zero
Originally posted by TrevJo

I think the tiebreaker system should at least consider conference record as the first tiebreaker


before actual record, yes I agree


wat
 
Daedalus
offline
Link
 
Any suggestion for more or less than 16 game seasons = terrible. This is football. When/if the NFL changes, GLB can follow.

I do like the #9 seed in each conference sticking around in WL the following season vs. some scrub pro team promoting though.
 
Gart888
things!
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BuddyRyans34D
Any suggestion for more or less than 16 game seasons = terrible. This is football. When/if the NFL changes, GLB can follow.

h.


Please tell me you're being retarded on purpose here
 
inurbase
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BuddyRyans34D
Any suggestion for more or less than 16 game seasons = terrible. This is football. When/if the NFL changes, GLB can follow.

I do like the #9 seed in each conference sticking around in WL the following season vs. some scrub pro team promoting though.


GLB =/= the NFL

OP is well thought out +1
 
zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
Originally posted by chronoaug

Originally posted by tautology



Not terrible ideas, but I think the chances of Bort breaking the current league and schedule formats just for WL are somewhere very near 0%.



this


i think they should poll the entire userbase and see what non-boosting pee wee owners think.


 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.