Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Galkuris
More like 50% and around 2/3 of the pass plays.

It worked and you dominated...but don't try to pass it off as 30%.

I have just watched the full game and marked it down. 30 out of 98. That is pretty close to 30%

Originally posted by cavalier

30 out of 98 offensive plays. Several of the 30 was incompletions.

You guys were doing as bad defending streaks, hooks, cross routes...

Cross routes are slants

It was more than we planned to do, that is for sure. But I tried auto-adjust at quickly instead of none for the first time and that tilted the game plan a good bit.

Originally posted by cavalier
I have just watched the full game and marked it down. 30 out of 98. That is pretty close to 30%

btw, the difference in numbers comes from us just using the scout to see the plays called. Doesn't really matter either way because as you said your passes were hitting all over the field.

Originally posted by Galkuris
Cross routes are slants

I marked most of them down as slants, so most of them are counted. But routes where a receiver runs ten yards straight, and breaks off inside is not counted as a slant.

Originally posted by Galkuris
btw, the difference in numbers comes from us just using the scout to see the plays called. Doesn't really matter either way because as you said your passes were hitting all over the field.

Oh, then I understand. I did not count plays where we threw to a receiver running a streak route a slant even if another receiver ran a slant route.

Originally posted by Dolphin Greats
so far Alpine and Blaze had to avenge teams they lost in regular season

if the streak continues....

That'd be nice

Whoever runs the most most plays with slant routes will win.

ISLANT!

Originally posted by Dolphin Greats
so far Alpine and Blaze had to avenge teams they lost in regular season

if the streak continues....

Hmm.. That's pretty interesting. Didn't notice that. Though it makes sense since alpine is a 6seed and blaze a 4seed. The highest combined seed ccg in wl history?



Also, a big difference between this time and last time besides a new OC and our DC having time unlike early in the season. I mean, osaka ran for 330 yards last time. Ran for 38 in the playoffs. Their passing game is solid but they've relied a bit on the running game all season and couldn't run it that game. Was a big difference not to mention turnovers

Originally posted by bug03
Will this be considered an upset if Alpine wins?

Their offense is KILLING it right now. Did Alpine really 0 cares/back their way into the playoffs only to come out top dog?

Yes it will because its against the Blaze lol

This year has been pretty competitive. IMO any team winning at this point wouldn't surprise me.

Originally posted by 5STAR
67 slants will do that

was a great gameplan tbh....kept your defense off the field to prevent the typical 4th Q collapse because of low stamina/confidence



that's pretty much called 'running a good offense' in S17. Alpine has some of the best WRs in the game, and since cav has taken over it's pretty clear that nobody's DBs can do much of anything against them. Why wouldn't you pass all the time if the other team can't stop it?

They didn't catch you sleeping--you could run that game again and know their offensive gameplan coming in, and unless you found the right exploit blitz (which you probably don't have the personnel to run) it wouldn't matter worth a damn. They'd still kill you.

Osaka was a good team this year. Alpine was a better one--if it makes you feel better to denigrate them because you think the Wowi were a crappy opponent so destroying us doesn't mean anything, feel free, but if you think Alpine somehow won on a gimmick you're deluding yourself. They're possibly the best team in the game right now, and the Blaze-Alpine game should be a display of the best passing attacks GLB has to offer.

/srsdotballrant