User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Parab00n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mhayes
Originally posted by Parab00n

Originally posted by mhayes


i have a few questions? how many people voted for the commisioners? maybe 15 if that many. so how can you have a "election" when less than 10 % of the people casted a vote. plus, what "powers do you have as commisioners? or is it just a title to boost your self-esteem? what makes me give a crap about what you have to say? just curious, not sure how it works.




They have really no powers at the time. If they did a lot more people would have voted. The Pro Bowl voting thing is great though. As far as them actually being able to stop some of our guys from stiring up trouble they can't do much. For example, go check out the Western Europe AAA. A guy named T-Noles wrecks complete havoc.

I like the pro bowl voting also. but i think there should be a limit to # of guys from one team, so that a commish doesnt load the pro bowl up with a bunch of his guys.



I doubt they would do that.
 
tightspandex
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Parab00n
Originally posted by mhayes

Originally posted by Parab00n


Originally posted by mhayes



i have a few questions? how many people voted for the commisioners? maybe 15 if that many. so how can you have a "election" when less than 10 % of the people casted a vote. plus, what "powers do you have as commisioners? or is it just a title to boost your self-esteem? what makes me give a crap about what you have to say? just curious, not sure how it works.




They have really no powers at the time. If they did a lot more people would have voted. The Pro Bowl voting thing is great though. As far as them actually being able to stop some of our guys from stiring up trouble they can't do much. For example, go check out the Western Europe AAA. A guy named T-Noles wrecks complete havoc.

I like the pro bowl voting also. but i think there should be a limit to # of guys from one team, so that a commish doesnt load the pro bowl up with a bunch of his guys.



I doubt they would do that.



I thought they only tallied the pro bowl votes from everyone? If that's not the case, then you can make it so that they cannot vote for someone on their own team (which if we all get to vote should be a rule as well).

 
KellerFox
offline
Link
 
As ive said before, im fine with Salizy running everything however in my other leagues Pro Bowlers have been tallied based on the vote of each of the owners (or a GM representitive) from each team in that conference. While Salizy could help organize this and perhaps get a vote of his own for each conference, I think having each team have 1 rep to vote for the Pro Bowl is the best way to do it.
 
Parab00n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KellerFox
As ive said before, im fine with Salizy running everything however in my other leagues Pro Bowlers have been tallied based on the vote of each of the owners (or a GM representitive) from each team in that conference. While Salizy could help organize this and perhaps get a vote of his own for each conference, I think having each team have 1 rep to vote for the Pro Bowl is the best way to do it.



I think that would be fair.

 
DAKING
offline
Link
 
The owners and GMs should psot the nominations in their team forums and their team as a whole can decide
 
ranks0213
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KellerFox
As ive said before, im fine with Salizy running everything however in my other leagues Pro Bowlers have been tallied based on the vote of each of the owners (or a GM representitive) from each team in that conference. While Salizy could help organize this and perhaps get a vote of his own for each conference, I think having each team have 1 rep to vote for the Pro Bowl is the best way to do it.


I agree
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.