Originally posted by kurieg
Dior took a really nice angle. :| Better than many D dots
lol, so true
Dior took a really nice angle. :| Better than many D dots
lol, so true
Forum > Pro Leagues > WTF were you thinking, Hurf?
coachviking
offline
offline
Originally posted by David Stern
Originally posted by coachviking
Dats my CB
Damn, Clutch?
Nope
Originally posted by coachviking
Dats my CB
Damn, Clutch?
Nope
Dpride59
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachviking
Nope
The INT roll is truly one of glbs biggest mysterys.
I have seen cb's with 46% deflect ball playing on semi aggressive get 10+ int's in a season, and in the very same season seen a 46% int chance/15 clutch aggressive fs get 1. Definitely the most random aspect of the game.
Nope
The INT roll is truly one of glbs biggest mysterys.
I have seen cb's with 46% deflect ball playing on semi aggressive get 10+ int's in a season, and in the very same season seen a 46% int chance/15 clutch aggressive fs get 1. Definitely the most random aspect of the game.
Originally posted by David Stern
Originally posted by coachviking
Nope
The INT roll is truly one of glbs biggest mysterys.
I have seen cb's with 46% deflect ball playing on semi aggressive get 10+ int's in a season, and in the very same season seen a 46% int chance/15 clutch aggressive fs get 1. Definitely the most random aspect of the game.
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
Originally posted by coachviking
Nope
The INT roll is truly one of glbs biggest mysterys.
I have seen cb's with 46% deflect ball playing on semi aggressive get 10+ int's in a season, and in the very same season seen a 46% int chance/15 clutch aggressive fs get 1. Definitely the most random aspect of the game.
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
glwarriors
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachviking
Dats my CB
Could use a tad more break tackle imo.
Dats my CB
Could use a tad more break tackle imo.
Ahrens858
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
because CBs never force fumbles. amirite
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
because CBs never force fumbles. amirite
Originally posted by Ahrens858
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
because CBs never force fumbles. amirite
charles tillman forces plenty of fumbles. but glb isnt nfl. >_>
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
i've always felt that the int roll is more a catastrophic failure by the QB, and really has little to do with the cb... same way that a fumble is more a terrible break tackle roll than the product of a fumble forcing build. every time i see a cb with less than 48 capped strength cause a fumble, i die alittle.
because CBs never force fumbles. amirite
charles tillman forces plenty of fumbles. but glb isnt nfl. >_>
Ahrens858
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
charles tillman forces plenty of fumbles. but glb isnt nfl. >_>
what team does he play for.
charles tillman forces plenty of fumbles. but glb isnt nfl. >_>
what team does he play for.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
