Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick

Offense wasn't the problem, genius, and KC's pass defense is much weaker than their run defense. We lost because I had a couple of flaws in my designed plays and Speedy destroyed them.

That certainly didn't help. I wouldn't sit here and act like you did your job in covering their only real offensive threat, but a good OC would try and take the pressure off of any defense playing KC by running some clock off, especially with a 30 point lead...genius.

KCs run defense is not good, and statistically it is helped dramatically by all the sacks they rack up. And conversely the pass defense is much better than it looks statistically because of that. You guys ran at a 62% success rate and 70% rushing the ball inside. When a QB is getting hammered all game, it wears him down and then at the end of the game you can't complete anything, and you have 3 and outs, and the defense gets tired. 4th quarter TOP was 12:30-2:30 and the offense had a total of 9 plays. Sure, the passing game was effective early, but moving over the running game with that lead against that team would have won you guys the game.

Originally posted by GMathiasf
That certainly didn't help. I wouldn't sit here and act like you did your job in covering their only real offensive threat, but a good OC would try and take the pressure off of any defense playing KC by running some clock off, especially with a 30 point lead...genius.
Saying that Greedy is KC's "only real offensive threat" is amusingly stupid since Mark Clark has been one of the top WRs in the game, and ultimately proved that on the game-winning TD. Moreover, either you have never been a coordinator or simply never noticed that it doesn't always do what you intend, because we're not set up to pass 72% of the time, but sometimes it just happens. Unless we took passes out of the gameplan completely when playing with a lead, then we'd be at risk of stuff like this. But when it does hit the pass percentage on first down and you get sacked, then you're going to end up passing again on second.

So congratulations for taking a giant shit on seahawk's work, GMathiasf . Honestly, do you ever post anything but bitter complaints? Maybe you did at one point in time, but that sure seems like the only thing you do now.

hey everybody, cat fight!

Originally posted by jdbolick

Saying that Greedy is KC's "only real offensive threat" is amusingly stupid since Mark Clark has been one of the top WRs in the game, and ultimately proved that on the game-winning TD. Moreover, either you have never been a coordinator or simply never noticed that it doesn't always do what you intend, because we're not set up to pass 72% of the time, but sometimes it just happens. Unless we took passes out of the gameplan completely when playing with a lead, then we'd be at risk of stuff like this. But when it does hit the pass percentage on first down and you get sacked, then you're going to end up passing again on second.

So congratulations for taking a giant shit on seahawk's work, GMathiasf . Honestly, do you ever post anything but bitter complaints? Maybe you did at one point in time, but that sure seems like the only thing you do now.


Hmm.

By my calculations, if you had simply done a QB kneel on every play in the 4th quarter KC would not have had time to make their comeback (all other things being equal).

So......

Originally posted by tautology
Hmm. By my calculations, if you had simply done a QB kneel on every play in the 4th quarter KC would not have had time to make their comeback (all other things being equal). So......
Because I'm sure that's in your OAI to start kneeling at the beginning of the 4th quarter with a big enough lead, right? Except that it isn't, which means that you and GMathiasf are shitting on seahawk's thread to take unprompted shots at another team. Awesome. You two are truly great assets to the World League.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Saying that Greedy is KC's "only real offensive threat" is amusingly stupid since Mark Clark has been one of the top WRs in the game, and ultimately proved that on the game-winning TD.

Mark Clark catches like 25% of his passes. Sure, he'll probably get one big one on you a game, but it's not brain surgery to stop him. Keep the FS as deep as you can and get pressure on the QB. He's in no way, shape, or form "one of the top WRs in the game".

Originally posted by
Moreover, either you have never been a coordinator or simply never noticed that it doesn't always do what you intend, because we're not set up to pass 72% of the time, but sometimes it just happens. Unless we took passes out of the gameplan completely when playing with a lead, then we'd be at risk of stuff like this. But when it does hit the pass percentage on first down and you get sacked, then you're going to end up passing again on second.

meh, I understand that. I know I've had games that I was shocked when I saw the run/pass %.

Originally posted by
So congratulations for taking a giant shit on seahawk's work, GMathiasf . Honestly, do you ever post anything but bitter complaints? Maybe you did at one point in time, but that sure seems like the only thing you do now.

how is it a bitter complaint when I make fun of your team's horrible game planning failure? You seriously don't make much sense typically, but if you can't understand how passing the ball 50+ times against KC is a bad idea (unless you find 50 quick hitting passes that Backer won't get you I guess), then I can't help you. Hopefully you guys learn from your error, but Providence is a much better team than KC imo. That's a bad loss on your part, and it has NOTHING to do with seahawks thread. I appreciate him doing this and tbh, I wouldn't have even looked at this game if he hadn't reviewed it.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by tautology

Hmm. By my calculations, if you had simply done a QB kneel on every play in the 4th quarter KC would not have had time to make their comeback (all other things being equal). So......
Because I'm sure that's in your OAI to start kneeling at the beginning of the 4th quarter with a big enough lead, right? Except that it isn't, which means that you and GMathiasf are shitting on seahawk's thread to take unprompted shots at another team. Awesome. You two are truly great assets to the World League.

A lot of people have programmed their AI to start running the ball when they get a good but not invincible lead. This happens in real football for a reason. It is not a ridiculous thing to point out.

Originally posted by w_alloy
Originally posted by jdbolick

Originally posted by tautology


Hmm. By my calculations, if you had simply done a QB kneel on every play in the 4th quarter KC would not have had time to make their comeback (all other things being equal). So......
Because I'm sure that's in your OAI to start kneeling at the beginning of the 4th quarter with a big enough lead, right? Except that it isn't, which means that you and GMathiasf are shitting on seahawk's thread to take unprompted shots at another team. Awesome. You two are truly great assets to the World League.

A lot of people have programmed their AI to start running the ball when they get a good but not invincible lead. This happens in real football for a reason. It is not a ridiculous thing to point out.

i guess discussing the game in a thread about the game is shitting on seahawk? O_o

Originally posted by GMathiasf
Mark Clark catches like 25% of his passes. Sure, he'll probably get one big one on you a game, but it's not brain surgery to stop him. Keep the FS as deep as you can and get pressure on the QB. He's in no way, shape, or form "one of the top WRs in the game".
It's amazing that with all the many examples of you being laughably wrong, that you never would have learned to just own up to your failure instead of relying on excuses that make you look even worse. Clark absolutely has been one of the top WRs in the game, as his stats unequivocally show. He's one of the fastest WRs in the game, and if you weren't so utterly clueless then maybe you'd notice that on his game-winning TD I had the FS as far deep and playing as far off as he possibly can in the DPC/DAI, yet Clark still burned him for the touchdown.

Originally posted by
meh, I understand that. I know I've had games that I was shocked when I saw the run/pass %.
If you knew that, then why did you make a complete ass out of yourself by running your mouth? We didn't want to pass 72% of the time or even close to that. Or OAI is not set up that way, as anyone who has ever seen any of our games could tell you. So it took only rudimentary intelligence to realize that we got fucked over by the percentages, and yet you still chose to be a dick. Again, congratulations.

Originally posted by
how is it a bitter complaint when I make fun of your team's horrible game planning failure? You seriously don't make much sense typically, but if you can't understand how passing the ball 50+ times against KC is a bad idea (unless you find 50 quick hitting passes that Backer won't get you I guess), then I can't help you.
The fact that you admit that you know how the sim can make you pass or run far more than what you planned for in your OAI, yet then go right back to insisting that it was somehow a game-planning failure highlights not only your irrationality, but why so many people is this game dislike you (in fact, I don't know anyone who does like you). You are a bitter, frustrated individual who does absolutely nothing but complain or attack other people. Now obviously I've had more than my share of run-ins with others, but that's actually all you do. You don't post a damn thing on the forums unless it's taking a shot at someone else, and it's because you're a miserable human being.

Originally posted by
Providence is a much better team than KC imo.
Yet more of your ignorance. KC is a very talented team who pretty much everyone thought was much better than Providence at the start of last season.



Originally posted by w_alloy
A lot of people have programmed their AI to start running the ball when they get a good but not invincible lead. This happens in real football for a reason. It is not a ridiculous thing to point out.
What's ridiculous is for a collection of assholes to take a recap thread and shit all over it for incomprehensible reasons that have nothing to do with the game. Again, we obviously had no intention of passing 72% of the time, or anywhere near that. Anyone with a brain already realized that. Moreover, I already pointed out that the reason we lost is that I fucked up some things in the DPC. On one of my new plays I didn't have the LOLB covering the TE, hence Rum Jum's big day, and my Weak I defense for Speedy was similarly terrible.

But notice that Buxx didn't come in here talking shit about how we lost the game. He sent me a nice message about how much he enjoyed the game, and as frustrating as the loss was for me, I felt good for him. Then a bunch of jackasses who had nothing to do with the game start running their mouths in the forum about shit that isn't even correct. How does that make any sense? I don't talk shit about other teams because I value sportsmanship, whether in real life competition or this fake internet game. Evidently some of you never learned those lessons, maybe because you never actually played sports.

lmao bolick, you're a special human being, that's for sure

Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
hey everybody, cat fight!

get your popcorn ready....
i got me some popcorn....

Originally posted by GMathiasf
lmao bolick, you're a special human being, that's for sure
Have you ever seen me talk shit to another team? Ever? No, you haven't. You do because you're a bitter failure who lacks the courage to end his own miserable existence, so you chose to spend your waking hours inflicting whatever misery you can on anyone you can reach.

dear god

Originally posted by tautology

Hmm.

By my calculations, if you had simply done a QB kneel on every play in the 4th quarter KC would not have had time to make their comeback (all other things being equal).

So......



lol... are you saying kind sir.. that losing 3 yards a play 3 times in a row and punting... would have won the game? that passing the ball or even rushing the ball forward (or even side to side) in a normal typical American football manner would have been less effective then kneeling for 15 minutes of the 4th?

i do say this American game is quite riveting. crazy lil chaps you are

Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
dear god

yes my son?