Stupid question of the day.
RNG = ?
nm, Random Number Generator?
RNG = ?
nm, Random Number Generator?
Edited by MoJames on Jan 17, 2010 09:48:45
Forum > Pro Leagues > We should start running this experiment each season
w_alloy
offline
offline
GL to you guys as well. For both our sake I hope the sim isn't as crazy as our last one, although it was really fun to watch.
w_alloy
offline
offline
Crazy FWIW I've had my eyes on your dots since we first scrimmaged DLDT in season 8. Every season after that I've looked to see how you were doing. Remember that PM I sent you in season 8 or 9 trying to figure out how long term oriented your slow building was?
I've had a feeling this day would come for a while
I've had a feeling this day would come for a while
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by w_alloy
If the purpose is to see how random the RNG is, why does it have to be the WL championship game?
Because they know you'll outgameplan loldrinkin
If the purpose is to see how random the RNG is, why does it have to be the WL championship game?
Because they know you'll outgameplan loldrinkin
Originally posted by w_alloy
Crazy FWIW I've had my eyes on your dots since we first scrimmaged DLDT in season 8. Every season after that I've looked to see how you were doing. Remember that PM I sent you in season 8 or 9 trying to figure out how long term oriented your slow building was?
I've had a feeling this day would come for a while
I knew we played earlier then season 10 I was desperately looking for that game.
TBH I thought it would be next season and not this one.
I was just going back through the old DLDT forums I am pretty sure our win over Val in those scrimmage games were considered big.
I am kind of pissed off that stobie told me about 15 times this off season to not add Hail MAry
I am ranting now.
Pretty sure if DLDT/DD/Val merged it would put up scores that would crash the server Sucks bort nerfed big rosters lol.
Crazy FWIW I've had my eyes on your dots since we first scrimmaged DLDT in season 8. Every season after that I've looked to see how you were doing. Remember that PM I sent you in season 8 or 9 trying to figure out how long term oriented your slow building was?
I've had a feeling this day would come for a while
I knew we played earlier then season 10 I was desperately looking for that game.
TBH I thought it would be next season and not this one.
I was just going back through the old DLDT forums I am pretty sure our win over Val in those scrimmage games were considered big.
I am kind of pissed off that stobie told me about 15 times this off season to not add Hail MAry
I am ranting now.
Pretty sure if DLDT/DD/Val merged it would put up scores that would crash the server
Sucks bort nerfed big rosters lol. Edited by crazy454 on Jan 17, 2010 10:59:42
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by crazy454
Championship game gets played.
Als don't get touched
Two team have a scrimmage set for after the Champ game
=
How RNG the RNG is
Thoughts?
Nice science, 2 is your sample size? Lame.
Championship game gets played.
Als don't get touched
Two team have a scrimmage set for after the Champ game
=
How RNG the RNG is
Thoughts?
Nice science, 2 is your sample size? Lame.
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Nice science, 2 is your sample size? Lame.
no it would grow with each championship game.
Nice science, 2 is your sample size? Lame.
no it would grow with each championship game.
The Duff Man
offline
offline
The results can be very different, with some of the biggest fluctuations being with the playcalls and not necessarily with individual rolls (make a tackle or don't)
In our playoff game, there was a situation where we had a package calling for a certain play 40% of the time. The RNG called that play 6 out of 7 times. With the defense they were using, either of the other two plays that accounted for 60% of the probability would have been great gains.
If the game were re-run and the calls were reversed, with the dud only getting 1 out of 7 plays, that makes a huge difference. We probably convert at least two or three extra drives where had to punt.
That is just one package. Multiply that times all of the packages, on both offense and defense, and there is a chance for wild swings in scores.
In our playoff game, there was a situation where we had a package calling for a certain play 40% of the time. The RNG called that play 6 out of 7 times. With the defense they were using, either of the other two plays that accounted for 60% of the probability would have been great gains.
If the game were re-run and the calls were reversed, with the dud only getting 1 out of 7 plays, that makes a huge difference. We probably convert at least two or three extra drives where had to punt.
That is just one package. Multiply that times all of the packages, on both offense and defense, and there is a chance for wild swings in scores.
MC_Hammer
offline
offline
Originally posted by crazy454
LMAO on paper Val in nearly impossible to scout.
Not if you do it scientifically.
Unfortunately it requires too much care.
LMAO on paper Val in nearly impossible to scout.
Not if you do it scientifically.
Unfortunately it requires too much care.
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by crazy454
no it would grow with each championship game.
Oh well that sounds cool.
no it would grow with each championship game.
Oh well that sounds cool.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
