Actually we were pretty sure that we'd win this one - but the upcoming game worries me a bit...
Kilkenny (much like our team) is up on top because we had pretty easy schedules - apart from the Rome win and the Glasgow loss, there wasn't much competition
You might also count the Crusaders game. They were quite good and we won because we had a few big plays there - but on the other hand those big plays happened because of very one sided CB builds. If you play a team that has a secondary that can't tackle and you target your strongest tackle-breaking receivers, big plays are bound to happen - and they did....
Lisbon is at least as strong as London and maybe even as tough as rome (where we got lucky winning - could have been a loss as well) so I think they can decide the #1 seed in the next game.
If we lose it will be Glasgow because of the win against us, if we win and we don't get upset in the remaining games then we will probably end up 1st seeded (would rather put us between 3rd and 5th and definetly below Glasgow, Rome and maybe even Lisbon or London)
Kilkenny (much like our team) is up on top because we had pretty easy schedules - apart from the Rome win and the Glasgow loss, there wasn't much competition
You might also count the Crusaders game. They were quite good and we won because we had a few big plays there - but on the other hand those big plays happened because of very one sided CB builds. If you play a team that has a secondary that can't tackle and you target your strongest tackle-breaking receivers, big plays are bound to happen - and they did....
Lisbon is at least as strong as London and maybe even as tough as rome (where we got lucky winning - could have been a loss as well) so I think they can decide the #1 seed in the next game.
If we lose it will be Glasgow because of the win against us, if we win and we don't get upset in the remaining games then we will probably end up 1st seeded (would rather put us between 3rd and 5th and definetly below Glasgow, Rome and maybe even Lisbon or London)
