WHO WON THE FUCKING CUP?
Forum > Pro Leagues > Alpha is stacked
jvguballa
offline
offline
If you ranked them 1-16 in both conferences and then compared, you'd find just about every single team in Alpha was a bit better than their counterpart in Zeta imho.
23yrwej
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
Originally posted by kalkmanc
looks pretty even to me.
Really?
Doesn't look near as bad as last season, yea Alpha has MEM, Lincoln, Cincy and Dry but Zeta has HHW, Drinkin, OTR and Bonn so it's not a huge difference...Alpha is better but not by as much as Zeta was better last season.
Originally posted by kalkmanc
looks pretty even to me.
Really?
Doesn't look near as bad as last season, yea Alpha has MEM, Lincoln, Cincy and Dry but Zeta has HHW, Drinkin, OTR and Bonn so it's not a huge difference...Alpha is better but not by as much as Zeta was better last season.
Asheme
offline
offline
I guess I don't see it. Alpha got most of the first tier teams, Zeta got most of the second tier.
drazz00
offline
offline
Ooooh, Three Kingdoms and HHW in the same league?
That's some serious Wang on WAng action right there.
That's some serious Wang on WAng action right there.
head1
offline
offline
Originally posted by drazz00
Ooooh, Three Kingdoms and HHW in the same league?
That's some serious Wang on WAng action right there.
They were in the same conference last season tbh.
Ooooh, Three Kingdoms and HHW in the same league?
That's some serious Wang on WAng action right there.
They were in the same conference last season tbh.
jktooley
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
Doesn't look near as bad as last season, yea Alpha has MEM, Lincoln, Cincy and Dry but Zeta has HHW, Drinkin, OTR and Bonn so it's not a huge difference...Alpha is better but not by as much as Zeta was better last season.
You're forgetting two teams that I think could end up in Zeta's top 4... Machu Picchu and 3 Kingdom... Both have season 2/3 rosters, and won't have any chemistry loss....
Not to mention the Blaze.....
Doesn't look near as bad as last season, yea Alpha has MEM, Lincoln, Cincy and Dry but Zeta has HHW, Drinkin, OTR and Bonn so it's not a huge difference...Alpha is better but not by as much as Zeta was better last season.
You're forgetting two teams that I think could end up in Zeta's top 4... Machu Picchu and 3 Kingdom... Both have season 2/3 rosters, and won't have any chemistry loss....
Not to mention the Blaze.....
Edited by jktooley on Sep 26, 2009 11:39:40
jktooley
offline
offline
Originally posted by jktooley
You're forgetting two teams that I think could end up in Zeta's top 4... Machu Picchu and 3 Kingdom... Both have season 2/3 rosters, and won't have any chemistry loss....
Oh... and tbh, even before that, either one of those teams were capable of beating any of the best teams.....
You're forgetting two teams that I think could end up in Zeta's top 4... Machu Picchu and 3 Kingdom... Both have season 2/3 rosters, and won't have any chemistry loss....
Oh... and tbh, even before that, either one of those teams were capable of beating any of the best teams.....
Voltron
offline
offline
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
I guess I don't see it. Alpha got most of the first tier teams, Zeta got most of the second tier.
Alpha got MEM and Dryho, then it's pretty even after that. Plus MEM and Dryho are beatable.
I guess I don't see it. Alpha got most of the first tier teams, Zeta got most of the second tier.
Alpha got MEM and Dryho, then it's pretty even after that. Plus MEM and Dryho are beatable.
jamz
offline
offline
It's f'n silly to even try and guess who's going to win this year with all the roster turn over.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
