User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > USA pro will have the most representatives in the WL next season ...
Page:
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Lazer Noble
Sam Bolster multi imo


ban OP
 
Mr. Me2
offline
Link
 
So what pro league will have the least or no representatives in the WL so we can promptly start making fun of them? I'm too lazy to figure it out on my own.
 
PsychoMan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by silenthatred
So what pro league will have the least or no representatives in the WL so we can promptly start making fun of them? I'm too lazy to figure it out on my own.


dunno but 2 is the minimum -18 is the max any team could have and they'd have to gain 2 every season and not lose any
Edited by PsychoMan on Sep 24, 2009 16:59:17
 
PsychoMan
offline
Link
 
actually, 18 is the max but even if a league was dominant, it probably wouldn't happen unless members of each league was split 50/50 to each conference. if it continues to be random, a league could have most or all of its members in one conference and risk losing some good teams
 
Bladnach
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by silenthatred
So what pro league will have the least or no representatives in the WL so we can promptly start making fun of them? I'm too lazy to figure it out on my own.


apl only has 2
 
NiborRis
offline
Link
 
So, which will be the first USAPL team to leave WL for whatever reason?
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round
 
Asheme
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by avgbrad
Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round

Math > speculation
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
Originally posted by avgbrad

Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round

Math > speculation


Except for RTJ, DB, and like two other guys that post regularly in that forum, they weren't really much of teammates. That's all I have to say about that.
 
blankspace
offline
Link
 
p good math
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by avgbrad
Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round


Damn you and your Freaking numbers....Amish math is not real math IMO
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by NiborRis
So, which will be the first USAPL team to leave WL for whatever reason?


I might have to go if my mom calls me
 
Link
 
thread needs more SEAPL
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by coachviking
Originally posted by avgbrad

Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round


Damn you and your Freaking numbers....Amish math is not real math IMO


amish math has 14% more hat

precisely
 
Jack Del Rio
offline
Link
 
***SRSTRON*** ASSEMBLE!!!
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.