Originally posted by Fruitbat Bearcat
I'm sorry, but I just can't avoid talking about Focker. To get immediately to the point, the very genesis of Focker's smarmy indiscretions is in masochism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that he will eventually himself be destroyed by masochism.
What do you think of this: Focker has an agenda—a political, social, and cultural agenda? He will effectuate the downfall of all that is decent and civilized some day—not necessarily by direct action, but by convincing his cult followers to add insult to injury. Need I point out that any day now, he will pull out all stops in his uncongenial drive to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to turn charlatans loose against us good citizens?
Now let's have some fun and examine a few of Focker's more ridiculous statements. First, Focker said that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and harebrained used-car salesmen. That's rather repulsive, isn't it? Later on, he claimed that he can walk on water. What this really means is that he wants to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency.
In keeping with all of their inner perverted brutality, Focker's bedfellows preach hatred. We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that we should avoid personal responsibility. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that Focker does not merely lay waste to the environment. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically.
Any effort to negotiate with Focker or appease him is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury. With enough time and room, it would be easy to show why this must be true but the clinching argument is simply that some day, Focker's unsympathetic disciples may ask you why you think it's a good idea to attack Focker's malice and hypocrisy. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. You should therefore be prepared to tell these unconscionable self-promoters that Focker's shiftless dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Clericalism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these atrabilious trends is to call a spade a spade. To be precise, the time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must indisputably change the world for the better. The first step in that process is to realize that whenever he announces that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors, his henchmen applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that the baneful nature of Focker's memoranda is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.
There are rumors circulating that Focker used twisted and self-contradictory logic to arrive at his conclusion that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders", so let me just clarify something: Just the other day, some of his obtrusive zealots forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Focker's blueprint for a world in which intrusive psychopaths are free to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that now that I've been exposed to Focker's endeavors I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that self-satisfied exponents of materialism are so much in hock to Focker that they feel obligated to fuel inquisitions. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Focker for trying to defy the law of the land. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, any rational argument must acknowledge this. Focker's execrable dissertations, naturally, do not.
If you can make any sense out Focker's fatuitous ploys then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. Some day, in the far, far future, Focker will realize that his brethren are easily manipulated. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how like a verbal magician, Focker knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. If I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Focker says that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life.
People who are attacked by self-pitying devil-worshippers basically have three options. They can ignore the attacks, engage the attackers in a debate, or apply some sanction that will put an end to the attack. What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a sex-crazed, pertinacious wacko. It's a fact. In particular, I want you to know that Focker's fulminations are a pitiful jumble of incoherent nonsense. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to expose every feckless practice of every feckless sponger.
It's debatable whether responsibility is an alien concept to Focker. However, no one can disagree that he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as him. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that Focker's invectives do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress.
As amazing as it seems, Focker uses the word "historiographical" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. If he gets his way, none of us will be able to create a world in which sexism, priggism, and deconstructionism are all but forgotten. Therefore, we must not let him resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. I should add parenthetically that Focker wants us to believe that society is screaming for his complaints. How stupid does he think we are? I would venture the answer has something to do with cynicism. To elaborate, his reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that his off-the-cuff comments can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality) and therefore—not surprisingly—he always arrives at that very conclusion. I suppose that's all I have to say in this post. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.
To the first point, she had the pics taken and without much resistance allowed them to be passed around. It wasn't some malicious computer nerd hacking her account and distributing them to everyone as you seem to be inferring with this statement. You also can gfy with this whole internet nerd virgin played out bs, you don't know who the **** any of us are or how much we get laid or don't get laid. If a girl with a nice rack gives tert pics to someone on a forum and then makes no effort in denying the fact I think it would make us gos to not want to see them. To the second point your post comes off as ridiculously pathetic and overcompensating. I get the feeling that you are one of those guys who is constantly life tilted that the girls you fall in love with always go for *******s and never want anything more from you than to be "just friends." I can imagine its really aggravating to put so much effort into bending over backwards for these girls only to time and time again have them go off and hook up with another guy who you deem to be an *******. Let me let you in on a little clue, girls like to be ****ed by *****, when you act like a little nurturing bitch its not gonna turn them on because they most likely see you as a pathetic figure who would likely cry after sex and profess your love to her the next day. So next time before projecting your insecurities out over internet how bout you unclench your ******* so your balls can finally drop into your sac and then maybe, just maaayyybbbee, you'll finally get the girl
