User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
StiffarmSteve
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KellerFox
Originally posted by StiffarmSteve

Originally posted by KellerFox


...win over the Rhino's...


Hopefully I won't hear that again for the rest of the season... lol


Looks like yall have worked the kinks out from early in the season and have a nice little streak going... but yall also have the current top 4 teams left. Regardless of the standings, you guys are capable of doing some damage in the playoffs.


I'm actually looking forward to those games!

Ready to charge... head down, horn pointed!
 
Link
 
No need to gameplan for the Sea Wolves. That team is terrible. They've been lucky up to this point
 
KellerFox
offline
Link
 
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg5f3k6p_0c7ktr4cn

LOL up to 4
 
NiborRis
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by KellerFox
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg5f3k6p_0c7ktr4cn

LOL up to 4


I've added the Pro League challenges, including APL vs SEAPL.
LOL up to 2nd now. I've run a few test scenarios, and if LOL can win the league game vs Sierra Leone and the rematch vs the wolfpack, LOL should probably overtake the Green Bay Maulers for 1st place.

As for APL:
2 LOL 18-1
16 Dijibouti 11-5
22 SierraLeone 12-4
41 SpiderMonkeez 8-3
56 ShadowChasers 9-3
57 WhiteRhinos 7-3
64 LGoT 8-9
69 WarriorKings 10-6
82 Warthogs 6-6
83 ABD 7-5
85 SeaWolves 10-3
94 GhanaBuffalos 6-5
99 AngDream 6-4

That's 13 teams in the top 100 - which is a touch over the average for 8 leagues, but when you consider that USAPL/CPL are likely to be grabbing more than their fair share, APL is doing just fine. 3 in the top 25 is holding your own as well.

One more interesting note: Strength of Schedule rank for DD? 5th!
 
soapbox
offline
Link
 
Bitchin, thanks for the writeup
 
Hokiemon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by soapbox
Bitchin, thanks for the writeup


 
zbuckley
offline
Link
 
This # 4 stuff just doesn't fit us. Were happy being the underdog form the APL.
 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Great stuff...nice job Lake.
Vegas
 
soapbox
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zbuckley
This # 4 stuff just doesn't fit us. Were happy being the underdog form the APL.


Well now we're half of what we were
 
NiborRis
offline
Link
 
What can I say, ever since getting on a team in Africa A a couple seasons back I've looked into APL to see what we were aiming for. While it's not USAPL, it's certainly got multiple strong teams and with the new promotion rules, all the Pro Leagues have been getting stronger top to bottom. I think if they did make a World league with the top 4 teams from each PL, APL would have 1 and possibly two playoff squads - something several other leagues would certainly not.
 
jdawg011
offline
Link
 
Not trying to knock your Rankings or anything Nibor, i really enjoy them, but how come the Sea Wolves are ranked behind teams we have beatin? We beat your #61, # 79, # 82 teams...im just curious, so please let me know
 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdawg011
Not trying to knock your Rankings or anything Nibor, i really enjoy them, but how come the Sea Wolves are ranked behind teams we have beatin? We beat your #61, # 79, # 82 teams...im just curious, so please let me know


I would assume losing to the 83rd hurt you guys.
Vegas
 
jdawg011
offline
Link
 
thanks for being so helpful vegas...
 
VegasABD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdawg011
thanks for being so helpful vegas...


I hope you know I wasn't trying to be a jerk...I have no idea how those ratings work.
Vegas
 
KellerFox
offline
Link
 
Its a little bit of a head scratcher too, I was going to say your non-league/scrim schedule... but that looks solid as well jdawg. You guys have held your own against some pretty good teams. Perhaps its not so much that your #85 bad, but just that there are #84 teams that are better per say in terms of the math (obviously). Looking at the teams that you've beaten that are ahead of you in the rankings... a common element I see is a less aggressive non-league scrimage schedule. Perhaps because they are in fewer tournaments and have done reasonably well (high win %?), their "tournament factor" is much higher?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.