User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Porch
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RandomBeast
Can Krakow expect to get I-Slammed all game? Please let us know so we can set up our 100% Slam offense if need be and we can play fumble roulette.


You clearly have to do it. They have already sold their soul to the devil why stop now.

Your problem is if you don't and they do and win you will be pissed.

if you do and they don't and you win then it is cheap but you are not pissed off. You have to do it because they have already shown that they have no integrity.
 
ekdar123
offline
Link
 
So your telling me that if the Chargers could run an off-tackle handoff out of the I for LT and Sproles and get 5 YPC every down that they wouldn't do it? Of if Jerome Bettis could come into the game for every -and-Goal situation and the defense knew he was getting the ball and couldn't stop it, the Steelers couldn't run it every play ('06 edition)? Or that LeBron shouldn't drive to the basket every time he touches the ball because a foul will get called and it isn't fair that he will score all those points (which he doesn't and it pisses me off)?

No, you put your team in the best position to win the game. If that means Cupp and Crash down your throat 70 times, then that's what we'll do. Krakow now has to expect 70:1 pass:rush. So if/when we throw all over them, it's because we expected them to stuff the box. Which teams have been doing all year to fail at stopping our backs.
 
Ballinbob
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by goldielax25
Originally posted by RandomBeast

Can Krakow expect to get I-Slammed all game? Please let us know so we can set up our 100% Slam offense if need be and we can play fumble roulette.


no we wont be doing it in the krakow game, i can guarantee that. the jacksonville game was to make sure we got promoted, nothing would be allowed to get in the way of that. we'll do our homework for you guys, i definitely want to see if we can pick up those 5 points we lost to you guys by in week 2 or not.


Why would you not do it to them, but do it to us??? That seems pretty jacked up. Remember I didn't complain about your gameplan. I don't think you should just do it against one team to get promoted, but then change your stance because you've been called out on it. Stick with your gameplan and what apparently works in this unbalanced game. Who care's who you might upset? It would look even more messed up to switch it now that it has been brought to everybody's attention. No matter what your view is it's an exploit, although it is still within the parameters of how the game is currently working. It's not cheating, but certainly is cheap. With that being said, I'm not complaining. You should do what you feel works best for your team and gives you the best chance to succeed. The thing is you should do it in all games, not just against one team. I just figured I'd address the issue since it directly effected my team.
 
goldielax25
offline
Link
 
i guess i dont have a rational explanation for it, other than the plan was to make sure we 100% got a shot to face krakow again, and then we would do what would suit us in that game. myself and my team want to have fun when we play the game, and the jacksonville game was more like work and less like fun. that was a game where i made the decision that you know what, i want to 100% face krakow and im not 100% sure we'd make it there if we didnt run it the whole game, so to ensure that i will put everything else aside, and just do the undesirable thing that leads to the desirable outcome.

exploits by nature are cheating, and we didnt do that. it was a cheesy move, but for the long term success of my team, i felt that the ends justified the means. an exploit would be finding a way to somehow use temp boosts in the playoffs or something like that, an advantage that no one else had. no matter what people say about this decision, there is no reason we should ever have passed there, because our passing game did not match up well with your defense, but our running game did.

you guys have a great team and you scared the shit out of me. i know the game we had earlier in the season was even closer than the 3 point difference, and i didnt want to get home from class yesterday to see that our season was over because we didnt do everything we could to win.

this game against krakow is important because of the trophy, but that really is it. the game against jacksonville was far more important in my mind, which is why i chose to pull out all of the stops there. if krakow deems this important enough to do it against us, then so be it. but say what you will about me for this decision, but one thing im not is a liar and im saying right now that isnt the offense we're running against krakow.
 
dook
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ekdar123
So your telling me that if the Chargers could run an off-tackle handoff out of the I for LT and Sproles and get 5 YPC every down that they wouldn't do it? Of if Jerome Bettis could come into the game for every -and-Goal situation and the defense knew he was getting the ball and couldn't stop it, the Steelers couldn't run it every play ('06 edition)? Or that LeBron shouldn't drive to the basket every time he touches the ball because a foul will get called and it isn't fair that he will score all those points (which he doesn't and it pisses me off)?

No, you put your team in the best position to win the game. If that means Cupp and Crash down your throat 70 times, then that's what we'll do. Krakow now has to expect 70:1 pass:rush. So if/when we throw all over them, it's because we expected them to stuff the box. Which teams have been doing all year to fail at stopping our backs.


This is loldots. STFU, you sound tarded.
 
Porch
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ekdar123
So your telling me that if the Chargers could run an off-tackle handoff out of the I for LT and Sproles and get 5 YPC every down that they wouldn't do it? Of if Jerome Bettis could come into the game for every -and-Goal situation and the defense knew he was getting the ball and couldn't stop it, the Steelers couldn't run it every play ('06 edition)? Or that LeBron shouldn't drive to the basket every time he touches the ball because a foul will get called and it isn't fair that he will score all those points (which he doesn't and it pisses me off)?

No, you put your team in the best position to win the game. If that means Cupp and Crash down your throat 70 times, then that's what we'll do. Krakow now has to expect 70:1 pass:rush. So if/when we throw all over them, it's because we expected them to stuff the box. Which teams have been doing all year to fail at stopping our backs.


You are clearly a fucking idiot. If they could do it they would however they don't have programmers who have to go through thousands of lines of code to make sure everything works perfect. You see in the NFL the D isn't limited to what the programmer told it to do and no one is worried that Cupp might get tired or hurt.

The Strong I Slam is proven that just about any team can gain 10 yards in 4 plays.

Take your cheap little victory but just know it and your entire team is now tainted. You were clearly scared of Jacksonville and had to use an exploit to get over. Congrats to you big guy.
 
Porch
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by goldielax25
i guess i dont have a rational explanation for it, other than the plan was to make sure we 100% got a shot to face krakow again, and then we would do what would suit us in that game. myself and my team want to have fun when we play the game, and the jacksonville game was more like work and less like fun. that was a game where i made the decision that you know what, i want to 100% face krakow and im not 100% sure we'd make it there if we didnt run it the whole game, so to ensure that i will put everything else aside, and just do the undesirable thing that leads to the desirable outcome.

exploits by nature are cheating, and we didnt do that. it was a cheesy move, but for the long term success of my team, i felt that the ends justified the means. an exploit would be finding a way to somehow use temp boosts in the playoffs or something like that, an advantage that no one else had. no matter what people say about this decision, there is no reason we should ever have passed there, because our passing game did not match up well with your defense, but our running game did.

you guys have a great team and you scared the shit out of me. i know the game we had earlier in the season was even closer than the 3 point difference, and i didnt want to get home from class yesterday to see that our season was over because we didnt do everything we could to win.

this game against krakow is important because of the trophy, but that really is it. the game against jacksonville was far more important in my mind, which is why i chose to pull out all of the stops there. if krakow deems this important enough to do it against us, then so be it. but say what you will about me for this decision, but one thing im not is a liar and im saying right now that isnt the offense we're running against krakow.


Translation: I had to use an exploit to win because I wasn't sure we were good enough.

I use cheat codes in my video games but I lack the skill and patience to actually beat a game.

Using an exploit to win is cheap. You can argue whether it is cheating or not but let's be honest it is a cheap ass move and shows if you could cheat you would.
 
goldielax25
offline
Link
 
no, i dont think it says anything about "cheating". it shows that in certain cases i will make sure to do what is best for my team.

look, there is a problem with the sim. every team that uses strong i slam ever is "cheating" if your logic is to be followed. if we used it 10% of the time before, and have success in that 10%, why wouldnt we just use it 100% of the time if its proven to be effective? you think its a good idea to use plays that arent effective in an important game? you think i should have had my team set up a game plan that wasnt good on purpose? if i thought a shotgun spread 100% of the time gave us the best chance to win i would have used that. the fact is is we have two great backs who can not only get that 3-4 yards per carry that average backs can get from the strong i slam, but can go all the way each time its run. we would have been stupid to not game plan as best as we could.
 
dook
offline
Link
 
Okay, so you'll be using the Slam in your conference championship game. Gotcha.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by goldielax25
no, i dont think it says anything about "cheating". it shows that in certain cases i will make sure to do what is best for my team.

look, there is a problem with the sim. every team that uses strong i slam ever is "cheating" if your logic is to be followed. if we used it 10% of the time before, and have success in that 10%, why wouldnt we just use it 100% of the time if its proven to be effective? you think its a good idea to use plays that arent effective in an important game? you think i should have had my team set up a game plan that wasnt good on purpose? if i thought a shotgun spread 100% of the time gave us the best chance to win i would have used that. the fact is is we have two great backs who can not only get that 3-4 yards per carry that average backs can get from the strong i slam, but can go all the way each time its run. we would have been stupid to not game plan as best as we could.



IE, i will cheat to win, if thats the only way to win......If you knowing over use something that is a known exploit to get an upper hand, thats cheating, no if ands or buts. But what will you do next season when I slam is nerfed, uhhh nothing. We would have been using I slam all season, but we choose to win/loose with morals. have a nice time going winless next season and getting demoted because I slam doesnt work next season
 
Arles
offline
Link
 
We'll be ready either way. Lyon is a good team and capable of beating us and that's what we will expect. I'll be doing both gameplans tonight and have PileDriver, Marcel, Our DEs and SS crew in a cage right now being fed only raw meat. We'll see what happens tomorrow
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
arles, wtf did you do to lost city... spend to much time on this team??? I mean winona isnt going anywhere yet, but after last season i expected more?
 
Arles
offline
Link
 
I decided to disband them at the start of the season. I just wasn't enjoying it anymore and real life was gutting into my GLB time. To be honest, I've done about an hour of gameplanning for Krakow all season (mostly the last playoff game) after I setup our initial template. To keep Lost City competitive, I had to gameplan hard every night for each game and that got old. We won two league and conference titles, had a nice run, but it was too much work. And, I just didn't feel comfortable letting someone else gameplan for Lost City, so I'm moving it back down and may start over down the road with them.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
what are you doing with your players,
 
Club America
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dook1e
Originally posted by ekdar123

So your telling me that if the Chargers could run an off-tackle handoff out of the I for LT and Sproles and get 5 YPC every down that they wouldn't do it? Of if Jerome Bettis could come into the game for every -and-Goal situation and the defense knew he was getting the ball and couldn't stop it, the Steelers couldn't run it every play ('06 edition)? Or that LeBron shouldn't drive to the basket every time he touches the ball because a foul will get called and it isn't fair that he will score all those points (which he doesn't and it pisses me off)?

No, you put your team in the best position to win the game. If that means Cupp and Crash down your throat 70 times, then that's what we'll do. Krakow now has to expect 70:1 pass:rush. So if/when we throw all over them, it's because we expected them to stuff the box. Which teams have been doing all year to fail at stopping our backs.


This is loldots. STFU, you sound tarded.


no fuck you, this is like real football, only its fake.

asshole.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.