Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bighookworm
I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

Good game Surge

Originally posted by Boltz
Originally posted by bighookworm

I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

what hes saying is that since its a 3 way tie and youd all beat each other, head to head would be gone, much like the big 12 this year with oklahoma, texas and texas tech

Originally posted by Boltz
Originally posted by bighookworm

I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

Nope, points scored is #1 when 3 teams are tied. When it's just 2 teams, then head to head is #1.

Originally posted by lionsalltheway
Originally posted by Boltz

Originally posted by bighookworm


I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

Nope, points scored is #1 when 3 teams are tied. When it's just 2 teams, then head to head is #1.

Yeah, this is what I was referring to when I said that head to head did not matter. Head to head only counts when it is two teams that are involved.

Now the all important question... "Who has been running up the score all year long?"

The Dream have the points advantage. Looking at the schedule I'm confident that they will keep that advantage.

The Dream are averaging nearly 96 points a game... other than maybe the Rampage they should be able to keep that average where it's at.

The Surge are averaging 73 points a game... that average has steadily risen since their poor showing against the Blue... there remaining games are pretty weak. The Surge would have to average over a 100 points a game (and that won't happen against the Bears.)

'Geddons have the tougher schedule... we're averaging 91 points and have the best chance of catching the Dream. But that is NOT gonna happen. Because standing in our way are the Swords of Chaos, Diamond Cutters and the Big-Bad Blue!

i dont know the surge have 4 games left. blue wave is an obvious 200+ point win. Chi-town has given up around 70-75 against the good teams theyve played. and calgary and vancouver could easily give up 160-180 each

GG surge

Let the race to run up the scores begin!

/QueueDrama

The Dream have 1153 points and the surge have 876, meaning the Surge have to make up around 277 points over a 4 game span, to overtake the Dream in points scored.

well looks like we have our work cut out for us

BlueBez

Originally posted by bighookworm
Originally posted by lionsalltheway

Originally posted by Boltz


Originally posted by bighookworm



I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

Nope, points scored is #1 when 3 teams are tied. When it's just 2 teams, then head to head is #1.

Yeah, this is what I was referring to when I said that head to head did not matter. Head to head only counts when it is two teams that are involved.

Now the all important question... "Who has been running up the score all year long?"

False. http://www.glbwiki.com/index.php?title=Playoff_Structure Boltz > You

Originally posted by OchO_CinCo
Originally posted by bighookworm

Originally posted by lionsalltheway


Originally posted by Boltz



Originally posted by bighookworm




I might be wrong on this one, but if we assume that the Blue win the rest of their games and the Surge beat the Dream, we would have three teams with two losses (assuming that we beat the Warmageddons, which was stated above) at the end of the year and the head to head would get thrown out. It will come down to points scored and I don't have the time or energy to figure out who would be the favorite in that scenario.

All things considered, this means that 2-4 would be decided by points scored (I believe that is the first tie-breaker), which means that you could finish anywhere in that range.

This is a moot point, because I think the Dream beat the Surge and lock up 2nd place today.

actually the tiebreaker is head to head i believe

Nope, points scored is #1 when 3 teams are tied. When it's just 2 teams, then head to head is #1.

Yeah, this is what I was referring to when I said that head to head did not matter. Head to head only counts when it is two teams that are involved.

Now the all important question... "Who has been running up the score all year long?"

False. http://www.glbwiki.com/index.php?title=Playoff_Structure Boltz > You



im still a little confused cuz we lost to the geddon, beat the dream, the dream beat the geddon, but lost to us, the geddon beat us bit lost to the dream, so we all are 1-1, so i think it does come down to points scored

exactly what i was trying to say lol