User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Team Hardline
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by
Was that a stab at Russians? And Obama is definitely not a communist, he may have some socialist ideas, but communist would be a ridiculous overstatement. You have barely given him any time to mend the economy.




Ahhh, you need to check out the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto. This is Barack's checklist.


You also need to read Barack's book Audacity of Hope where he practically gives Saul Aulinksy a hand job through out the whole thing.


This nation was built on FREEDOM. You can not solve one group's problems by burdening another group. When the fed. govt. makes decisions, it removes indivdual rights/freedom and replaces them with responsibility. That is not FREEDOM.
 
B3I3R
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Quadri Space


Stealing money from one household and using it to buy houses for another = punishing the producers. There is nothing extreme about protecting someones right to keep what they earn. Economies do not get "fixed" by stealing money from the wealthy and giving it to politicians. And PjSanford... it sounds like your Politics teacher needs to go back to school.



...I like this guy
 
PjSanford
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Quadri Space
Originally posted by Jedgi


Punish the producers? You don't think that is a little extreme? I'm not going to lie here, my family is upper-middle class, I don't care if we are taxed more than the average person, if it can help to fix the economy, it is good.


Stealing money from one household and using it to buy houses for another = punishing the producers. There is nothing extreme about protecting someones right to keep what they earn. Economies do not get "fixed" by stealing money from the wealthy and giving it to politicians. And PjSanford... it sounds like your Politics teacher needs to go back to school.



My Politics Teacher was a Member of the Tory Party under Thatcher. In fact he worked on some of their Policy. If you know much about World Politics, you will know Thatcher was very-very far from Communism.

Obama has next to nothing in come with Socialism or Communism (both of which are different ideas). You also need to learn a bit more about how some people "produce" money. I know a lot of rich people due to my work (Law/Politics Degree and work for a very-very high profile Law firm in the UK as all the other Misc Members know). I know people who don't work, but have their children on the pay role, good example is a girl who I'll refer to as LH, she earns £50,000 a year before taxation because she is one of the owners children. She's failed Uni three times and contributes nothing to society, in fact she's a drug addict (I know for a fact).

I see no problem with her loosing out on 30% of that money, so that someone who struggles and wasn't lucky can get a helping hand.

In fact, I am happy to loose 50% of my income to help others out. Society survives because of its weakest members not its strongest. We won't remove crime by lording it over poor people. We won't make Society better by those of us who have been lucky (and I am one of them) mocking those who haven't been lucky. Who we are born into has NOTHING TO DO WITH US but everything to do with how lucky we are.

Until we change society, so that EVERYONE has an equal chance to get to the top and we accept Meritocracy, we need to tax the rich more and help those lower down the social ladder, otherwise we have to accept things like crime, social disorder, etcetera, will increase and will get worse.
 
Team Hardline
offline
Link
 
Hey Sanford,

Plain and simple........ your nation was not build on ideas of FREEDOM! The USA was. My wife is calling and I need to go, but you just keep this thread going.


Socialism = Mediocracy at best

Capitalism = individual endless limits
 
Jedgi
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Team Hardline
Hey Sanford,

Plain and simple........ your nation was not build on ideas of FREEDOM! The USA was. My wife is calling and I need to go, but you just keep this thread going.


Socialism = Mediocracy at best

Capitalism = individual endless limits


I'd respond, but I don't want to get myself worked up and start a grudge match.
 
B3I3R
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jedgi


I'd respond, but I don't want to get myself worked up and start a grudge match.


If your response is about socialism and capitalism please do respond - I would enjoy listening/reading what you have to say
 
PjSanford
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Team Hardline
Hey Sanford,

Plain and simple........ your nation was not build on ideas of FREEDOM! The USA was. My wife is calling and I need to go, but you just keep this thread going.


Socialism = Mediocracy at best

Capitalism = individual endless limits


The UK has gone through more Wars over Freedom and The Rights of the Individual than the USA ever has, before you make such comments you should go and study some World History. If you cannot respond to the points I made, then do not comment at all.

The simple fact is, those who are rich (and I am), have an unfair advantage in Society. I thanks to my birth, was born into a family which:
Could give me the best education.
Best Social upbringing.
Etcetera.

I work day in and day out with kids who have NEVER been as lucky as me, and you can say:
"The parents should not have had them." But that isn't the fault of the child, that's the fault of the parent and you punish those at fault not those who are innocent.

When you've worked with decent, hard working kids who were abused their whole lives and the is NOTHING there to help them, come back and talk about Society and taxation policies to help others. Because if you can honestly turn around and say helping those kids isn't worth you loosing a few thousand dollers, then you have problems yourself.

Society is built based on the weak, we need the lower classes, we need those beneath the rich or else the would be no rich. That or you start PAYING A DECENT WAGE to those who are below us and the same thing happens.
 
Quadri Space
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PjSanford


My Politics Teacher was a Member of the Tory Party under Thatcher. In fact he worked on some of their Policy. If you know much about World Politics, you will know Thatcher was very-very far from Communism.

Obama has next to nothing in come with Socialism or Communism (both of which are different ideas). You also need to learn a bit more about how some people "produce" money. I know a lot of rich people due to my work (Law/Politics Degree and work for a very-very high profile Law firm in the UK as all the other Misc Members know). I know people who don't work, but have their children on the pay role, good example is a girl who I'll refer to as LH, she earns £50,000 a year before taxation because she is one of the owners children. She's failed Uni three times and contributes nothing to society, in fact she's a drug addict (I know for a fact).

I see no problem with her loosing out on 30% of that money, so that someone who struggles and wasn't lucky can get a helping hand.

In fact, I am happy to loose 50% of my income to help others out. Society survives because of its weakest members not its strongest. We won't remove crime by lording it over poor people. We won't make Society better by those of us who have been lucky (and I am one of them) mocking those who haven't been lucky. Who we are born into has NOTHING TO DO WITH US but everything to do with how lucky we are.

Until we change society, so that EVERYONE has an equal chance to get to the top and we accept Meritocracy, we need to tax the rich more and help those lower down the social ladder, otherwise we have to accept things like crime, social disorder, etcetera, will increase and will get worse.


“The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher

Margaret Thatcher = not communist (i agree)
Obama = communist (run out of other peoples money)

"I see no problem with her loosing out on 30% of that money" -- it's not your money!

"In fact, I am happy to loose 50% of my income to help others out." -- fine... give to charity, it's your choice and it is very personally rewarding.

It's pretty clear... Enjoy!
Last edited Mar 8, 2009 19:55:13
 
B3I3R
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PjSanford
[

In fact, I am happy to loose 50% of my income to help others out. Society survives because of its weakest members not its strongest.

Who we are born into has NOTHING TO DO WITH US but everything to do with how lucky we are.

Until we change society, so that EVERYONE has an equal chance to get to the top and we accept Meritocracy, we need to tax the rich more and help those lower down the social ladder, otherwise we have to accept things like crime, social disorder, etcetera, will increase and will get worse.



We will go in order, each # is correlated to your respective blurbs above.

1) How the hell does society survive via it's weakest members? Do weak members create jobs or generate capital? Last I checked "weak" members are bottom feeders and yes that is going as far as those on wealth fare, etc.

2) How lucky we are? What are you talking about? Have you ever heard of entrepreneurial people - I assume that you're saying "rich/wealthy" people are simply lucky? So for example - BORT, he is lucky to be in his situation because he created this addictive game and has made plenty of cash from it?

3) Everyone has an equal chance. Last time I checked, or at least in the states anyone can go to college as long as they meet requirement, everyone can breathe, some may need loans to do it and some may not live at such high of standards to get through college but they have the oppurtunity to succeed. It's all about personal choices and you don't even have to go to college to be successful but one's path in life totally comes down to choices he or she makes.

If Mike wants to drop out of college - where is he going to go work at? McDonalds? Most likely yes, do you really see college educated person working at McDonalds flipping burgers, didn't think so. Essentially your term of meritocracy is irrelevant...not every citizen in the world can live in the highest of classes and thus these classes are defined by the choices you make and the family you were born into. As far as the drug addicted person you know or know of - simply sad, but so true that she will live off of her parents for her entire life...
 
Quadri Space
offline
Link
 
I just have to post this again.... it summarizes this debate perfectly.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher
Last edited Mar 8, 2009 20:01:24
 
Jedgi
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Quadri Space
I just have to post this again.... it summarizes this debate perfectly.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher


Then where does the money go?
 
B3I3R
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jedgi
Originally posted by Quadri Space

I just have to post this again.... it summarizes this debate perfectly.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher


Then where does the money go?


Smart people burn it in an effort to minimize inflation

but your boy Obama enjoys printing lots of it.

Did you know - that if $1 million dollars was spent each day since Jesus was born we would have spent less money than proposed and passed by the bail out bill?

BTW - I'm not knock Obama for the economy at all so don't try and pull that card, I'm simply just saying.
Last edited Mar 8, 2009 20:09:18
 
PjSanford
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by B3I3R
Originally posted by PjSanford

[

In fact, I am happy to loose 50% of my income to help others out. Society survives because of its weakest members not its strongest.

Who we are born into has NOTHING TO DO WITH US but everything to do with how lucky we are.

Until we change society, so that EVERYONE has an equal chance to get to the top and we accept Meritocracy, we need to tax the rich more and help those lower down the social ladder, otherwise we have to accept things like crime, social disorder, etcetera, will increase and will get worse.



We will go in order, each # is correlated to your respective blurbs above.

1) How the hell does society survive via it's weakest members? Do weak members create jobs or generate capital? Last I checked "weak" members are bottom feeders and yes that is going as far as those on wealth fare, etc.

2) How lucky we are? What are you talking about? Have you ever heard of entrepreneurial people - I assume that you're saying "rich/wealthy" people are simply lucky? So for example - BORT, he is lucky to be in his situation because he created this addictive game and has made plenty of cash from it?

3) Everyone has an equal chance. Last time I checked, or at least in the states anyone can go to college as long as they meet requirement, everyone can breathe, some may need loans to do it and some may not live at such high of standards to get through college but they have the oppurtunity to succeed. It's all about personal choices and you don't even have to go to college to be successful but one's path in life totally comes down to choices he or she makes.

If Mike wants to drop out of college - where is he going to go work at? McDonalds? Most likely yes, do you really see college educated person working at McDonalds flipping burgers, didn't think so. Essentially your term of meritocracy is irrelevant...not every citizen in the world can live in the highest of classes and thus these classes are defined by the choices you make and the family you were born into. As far as the drug addicted person you know or know of - simply sad, but so true that she will live off of her parents for her entire life...


You need to do a bit of research on Social Mobility. Just because EVERYONE CAN doesn't mean some people don't get a much easier ride.

You have two people:
Person A: Working Class, has to work outside of High School, College, etcetera, so he can earn his degree. He averages a 14hour day because of this.
Person B: Family are rich, pay for him to go to School, he only has to go to class. He can thus spend more time focused on his studies.

To claim Person B has not got a higher chance of passing and an easier college life, is just a lie.

The reason society survives off of its weakest members, is because we have to use them and exploit them for those of us with money to survive. Take the law firm I work for, we have something like 30 people paid minimum wage, they sort the mail for us, they take phone calls, they file things, they take notes during meetings, etcetera. We cannot survive without them, but we do not pay them a decent wage.

The factory worker is another perfect example of this:
He goes to work, does 8hr days 5 (if not more) days a week, he produces the items, the person at the top is making money OFF OF THEM. That person would have no business, he would have no company if it wasn't for those people at the bottom. Just like they'd have no job if it wasn't for the person at the top. To claim he has so much more importance than they do is just bullshit. He'd have no business if it wasn't for them.

Oh and Quadri Space, stop getting involved in things you do not understand. Socialism is the Control of the MOP, not once have I spoke of the MOP till just now. You have no clue what you are going on about.
 
Quadri Space
offline
Link
 
"but we do not pay them a decent wage" - why do they work for you then? are they slaves?

"We cannot survive without them" --- there must be other people capable and willing to do their job or your firm would be out of business

"Socialism is the Control of the MOP" --- duh, the means of production (MOP as you call it) is exactly what I am talking about. Obama is working on this double-time. what do you think all these bailouts are for? control of the banks? control of manufacturing (GM?), control of labor (card-check)? control of health care? control of you? control of me?

are you blind?

 
PjSanford
offline
Link
 
I'm not blind, Obama has not nor is trying to take control of the MOP.

They work for us because they have no choice: You either starve or barely survive, people will take barely surviving.

You also do not understand what I mean by "survive without them" that'd be anyone taking that position.

Quadri, just how much do you earn and what do you do for a living?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.