Warrior General Games

Originally posted by britdevine316
Originally posted by Parab00n

I don't mind the randomness, but I do think that there should be a cap on how many each team should have. If not, then you'll continue to see the same champions every year.

I think 3 or 4 max endorsed players per team should be the cap. leaning more towards 3.

3 was the number I thought would be ok, that is ofc without any research or anything but 3 does sound like an ok number.

They're saying its lottery with your chances increasing relative to fame, but I don't see where teams getting bunches of endorsements have that much more fame than the rest -- a 10 to 20% advantage in fame shouldn't give the kind of results that are being seen in most leagues -- the past season's championship for instance seem to be a big factor instead, while individual stats and awards seem to be meaningless

the league leading pass got nothing in this league. and in SEAPL the team that won the naga conference got no endorsements either. I really dont know how it works

I agree it is is too top heavy. Especially with how good the pieces of equip are at the pro level! Giving the champion 7 is a bit too much.

Our Canadian BBB team won the title last season and got 11 out of 16 pieces of the equipment.

I am thinking that the 3 MAX per team would be a good number.

They also should make sure that the people who get them are deserving and active.

West Scranton Invaders got 11 of 16 in Oceania Pro....that's fuckin ridiculous

Originally posted by TUC
West Scranton Invaders got 11 of 16 in Oceania Pro....that's fuckin ridiculous

agreed. My team last in the conference championship and we didn't manage to get any from AAA.

The rich get richer.

Originally posted by minus_the_pain
The rich get richer.

Awww how sad!

Originally posted by eterry87
Originally posted by minus_the_pain

The rich get richer.

Awww how sad!

Actually turned out better for GLB with the changes.

Yesterday's announcement said max of 3 per team.