Originally posted by Bopher1
Originally posted by flyinillini98
Quite frankly, it's pretty dumb. I wouldn't mind if the top 3, 5, or 10 receivers were thrown in a hat and one name got pulled out for an endorsement, but backup FS? The total randomness associated with these awards is about as far from realism as you can get. No offense to the Bar Stars player, but a backup FS may get a local endorsement from a small business if he's a crowd favorite special teamer. Nationally, he's not going to get a thing and yet here we are adding this kind of thing to the game while there are so many other things Bort's time would be better spent on.
edit, the WR was an example, I meant you could do that for every stat leader, sacks, rushing, receiving, pass yards, etc. Then maybe award those players lottery tickets based on 'fame' if you want to make it count for something.
To counter that point, here is what I would say.
Teams would just try to run or throw to a certain player to get them the high stats to get the Endorsements. Also, with rampant guttings and slowbuild team, Whoever plays the more bad teams, would get the better stats and endorsements.
I agree 100%, but that's why I would still have a lottery but with only the top 10 leaders of each category or something. If a team rushes 100% of the time, they may lead the league, but they're going to be terribly easy to gameplan against and they'll still only have a 1:10 chance (roughly) to win the award. Personally, if a team is willing to sell their record for a chance to win the endorsement, I'd let them have it, winning is more important to me. As far as guttings/slow builds go, two points. It's not as rampant in higher leagues, there's only one cpu and no low level slow build teams in A7 I believe, second point is that you could base it on conference only stats if you wanted, then everyone plays the same competition.
I'll admit there is no perfect solution, but there are better solutions than what we have now which is a few people getting awards for no apparent reason.