User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Canadian A Leagues > Canadian A #3 > So, anyone doing any predictions for next season?
Page:
 
StewDog
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jschubert93
west


1. vancouver northern lights/ this team won last season lower lved than everyone else, now there getting comp close to their lvl

2. hogwarts wizards/ this team has great potential for the upcoming season

3. yellowknife eskimo hunters/ its this teams season to compete for the crown of the west

4. royal candian kilted yaksmen/ cant remeber if this team was once in A#3 but they dominated BBB, i just dont see them doing that at this lvl

5. manitoba nighthawks/ same as the yaksmen, dominated BBB, dont think they'll do that here

6. montreal mutants/ these guys have to win the games there suppose to win this season if they want to have a shot at the west this season

7. new cologne bears/ barely edges USAORG because of there close game last season

8. USAORG eagles/ this season i think they'll make the playoffs if the offense finds its groove

9. port royal acadians/ i think the acadians and the mavericks will find A#3 to be much more challenging than BBB

10. medicine hat mavericks/ i think they'll struggle against the class of the west but they'll have a shot at the playoffs

11. cardinal redbirds/ couldnt decide if they make the playoffs or not, definatly undecided on these guys, but look for them to make a splash if they can plug up some holes

12. ottowa jaguars/ o-line has too many holes in it

13. manitoba direwolves/ cant figure why this team has lost 25 straight games, good players, chem sucks though and gameplanning might be a big factor

14. montreal rulers/ dont look for them to make any signifigant noise this season

15. RC gladiators/ too many holes

16. saskatoon/ too many holes




very controversal u decide


We like the Rulers to be the underdog!! Should be a great season
 
Blaize18
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by crowbar832001
I'll do my full predictions for the west at the start of the preseason


Well, we found you Crow.

 
davearchie
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by johncu
Originally posted by davearchie

1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs
5. Cleveland BrownSnakes (1-15, AA#2) - damn, is AA that tough?
6. Booty Bay Bandits (11-5, A#3) - two-faced
7. The Frozen Tundra (8-8, A#3) - two-faced x2
8. Flin Flon Flyers (8-8, A#3) - faded hard down the stretch
9. Halifax Knights (8-8, A#3) - faded hard down the stretch x2
10. Moncton Machine (9-7, A#3) - faded hard down the stretch x3
11. Montreal Bullpups (16-0, BBB#6) - class of their division, lost in conference finals
12. St Clair Ice Hawks (6-10, A#3) - will need to add some talent to move up
13. Gergovie Les Gaulois (15-1, BBB#5) - champs of BBB#5 will need to make some moves
14. Pennybridge Pioneers (16-0, BBB#5) - cruised through the regular season but punked in the playoffs
15. Windsor Lumberjacks (15-1, BBB#6) - solid effort last year but will need more to compete in A
16. Calgary Mustangs (15-1, BBB#5) - move from West to the East after promotion

These are way early. You don't like 'em - post your own! Let's get a consensus preseason power rankings going.


Wow, Calgary 16th. I don't see that happening at all, but we'll see.


Like I said, I haven't looked at any offseason additions yet. You are welcome to post your own rankings.

I hated putting you guys 16th, but somebody had to be there ... and there aren't any patsies this season.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by davearchie
Originally posted by johncu

Originally posted by davearchie


1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs


unimaginative???? come on man that hurts....

 
crowbar832001
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Blaize18
Originally posted by crowbar832001

I'll do my full predictions for the west at the start of the preseason


Well, we found you Crow.



I have no computer at home right now. It was giving us problems and I told my wife on my off days I would look at it. While I was at work, one of her friends came over and she said her husband works on computers so my wife got the bright idea to send it off with her to be fixed ~sigh~ that has been a week. I just found out who won the conference championship games Wednesday not to mention the league championship games. She is afraid to call her friend and find out what the deal is. I told her that if she don't have an answer by Monday I am going buy a new computer from the tax money that was supposed to go to paying off her truck.
 
crowbar832001
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Cucamonga Quakes
Originally posted by davearchie

Originally posted by johncu


Originally posted by davearchie



1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs


unimaginative???? come on man that hurts....



I think you guys over played this season and it must have been to some good game planning. I had you pegged at 4-12 instead of 12-4 so I wouldn't say you were unimaginative.
 
crowbar832001
offline
Link
 
These quote boxes are all screwed up.
 
MissingNola
offline
Link
 
Yep, the RCKY were here as recent as season 6, but we weren't particularly noteworthy at the time!
 
iMan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by crowbar832001
Originally posted by Cucamonga Quakes

Originally posted by davearchie


Originally posted by johncu



Originally posted by davearchie




1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs


unimaginative???? come on man that hurts....



I think you guys over played this season and it must have been to some good game planning. I had you pegged at 4-12 instead of 12-4 so I wouldn't say you were unimaginative.


catsharks will win the title but in less of a dominating fashion without me
 
davearchie
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Cucamonga Quakes
Originally posted by davearchie

Originally posted by johncu


Originally posted by davearchie



1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs


unimaginative???? come on man that hurts....



Sorry dude, but there were only like two formations you ran multiple plays from! Everything else I could call out what you were going to run by the way you lined up.

Actually, that's just the O. Your D tactics were solid; I had a really hard time finding plays that would do any damage and you contained us well in both games.

I should keep my mouth shut; you'll probably switch things up now and kick our butts.
 
rlranger
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by davearchie
1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak


inconsistent wtf you talking about...oh yeah we were hehehe i tried to forget that part


http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i178/rlranger/Import/a356d5ac.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i178/rlranger/Import/de76b55b.jpg
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i178/rlranger/Import/f4a3c2a6.jpg
 
Djevik
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by iMan
Originally posted by crowbar832001

Originally posted by Cucamonga Quakes


Originally posted by davearchie



Originally posted by johncu




Originally posted by davearchie





1. Montreal Hawaiian Punch (11-5, A#3) - inconsistent, but the best at their peak
2. Prince Rupert Catsharks (9-7, A#3) - maybe playing the best at the end of last season
3. New Amsterdam Chronic (9-7, A#3) - or was it these guys?
4. Rancho Cucamonga Quakes (12-4, A#3) - great talent, unimaginative tactics exposed in playoffs


unimaginative???? come on man that hurts....



I think you guys over played this season and it must have been to some good game planning. I had you pegged at 4-12 instead of 12-4 so I wouldn't say you were unimaginative.


catsharks will win the title but in less of a dominating fashion without me


Best news I heard all day.

2 reasons:

Because Achilles actually did do a hell of a job and did better than Yrrep...

And because Im hoping you post less now

 
slave1ilo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by davearchie

7. The Frozen Tundra (8-8, A#3) - two-faced x2


irony. my ex-gf said the same thing about me.

this year we hope to add a new, third face. no, not the O face, it will be a surprise.
 
slave1ilo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by iMan

catsharks will win the title but in less of a dominating fashion without me


y r u still here?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.