Warrior General Games

yeah but JDros, Denver was down 49 tackles from last season!!!!

only 108, i don't know man.

157 is just insane, by the way

Originally posted by jdros13
Originally posted by Zurai

Originally posted by Mystico3


I wish they kept TFL stats!!!

They do in the "Full Season Stats" tab. Pretty impressive, btw; fully half of Sven's tackles were for losses (either sacks or TFLs). I thought my own LB Mikolai was doing good with 38.x%, sheesh.

I agree it should be easier to track.

Denver's % for this season was 59%.


yeah, sven ended up with 12 PD's because he was in coverage. you guys run a 3-4 so you just get to attack nonstop?

Originally posted by Mystico3
yeah but JDros, Denver was down 49 tackles from last season!!!!

only 108, i don't know man.

157 is just insane, by the way

our LOLB was up by 51 tackles and 9 sacks though. I was tired of keeping a good man down!

Originally posted by jdros13
Originally posted by Mystico3

yeah but JDros, Denver was down 49 tackles from last season!!!!

only 108, i don't know man.

157 is just insane, by the way

our LOLB was up by 51 tackles and 9 sacks though. I was tired of keeping a good man down!

holy $#!#.

that is he "Harrison effect", where Woodley had exploded thanks to the extra atention Harrison drew

how does one go up 51 tackles? did he not play last season?

Originally posted by Mystico3
Originally posted by jdros13

Originally posted by Mystico3


yeah but JDros, Denver was down 49 tackles from last season!!!!

only 108, i don't know man.

157 is just insane, by the way

our LOLB was up by 51 tackles and 9 sacks though. I was tired of keeping a good man down!

holy $#!#.

that is he "Harrison effect", where Woodley had exploded thanks to the extra atention Harrison drew

how does one go up 51 tackles? did he not play last season?

I did a couple of different things, plus teams definitely pay more attention to Denver now.

I received your sitemail. It was a pleasant surprise not having all nominations being from your team.

Originally posted by steinrat
I received your sitemail. It was a pleasant surprise not having all nominations being from your team.

I tried to give props to my team mates where I could, but it's hard to call a squad with a 5-11 record all-pros.

LB Lanski I think is definitely deserving, being 3rd in hurries and 6th in sacks with 20 less plays/game than Denver.
FS Biafra is a stretch, but 2 defensive TDs makes him a feasible choice. Free safeties are so hard to judge on numbers alone, and I sure as hell ain't gonna watch THAT much game tape.

So Steinrat, do you want the people who our team think should be nominated or the people from our team who we think should be nominated? We can do either it's just markm did everyone and I wasn't sure which we were supposed to do.

Originally posted by Linker2596
So Steinrat, do you want the people who our team think should be nominated or the people from our team who we think should be nominated? We can do either it's just markm did everyone and I wasn't sure which we were supposed to do.

I anticipated people would nominate their teammates, but I prefer the way markm did it. I recognize, though, that it's a lot more work to do what he did, so either way is cool with me. But at least be honest if you only nominate your players, though. If you don't have 5 OLs worthy of being on the ballet, don't nominate 5 OLs.

I have to admit I had to do a double take when I saw Phill McCracken's name in there. I guess hogs are used to not being noticed...

Thanks for the ego boost - it's really hard for the owner of an O-Lineman to know how he's doing!

Originally posted by don845
I have to admit I had to do a double take when I saw Phill McCracken's name in there. I guess hogs are used to not being noticed...

Thanks for the ego boost - it's really hard for the owner of an O-Lineman to know how he's doing!

I was surprised to see Ront's name listed there, as well.

O-Line is tough! Here were the factors I used -

1) Protection - hurries/sacks to the QB
2) Team rankings in rushing, both in yards and average YPC
3) Team passing success
4) Pancakes.
5) Amount of emotional scarring caused to our defensive line whn these beasts played Barossa.

Well - using that criteria - who am I to argue?

Also - Phill apologizes for that comment about your goat. It was spoken in the heat of battle and completely uncalled for.

Hey, thanks for doing a little something. I was glad to see some people got on here and talked. Active forums is the way to go!

any results yet?