Warrior General Games

well done.. really great survey..

lol damn Carbor, I didn't think of that. You have two guys on Chicago compared to one on Compton. Maybe not voting for someone on the huskies? That's a tough call lol.

I'm not much for this as some teams go deep. Consequently the starters don't put up gaudy stats on "O" or on "D" as they spread things around pretty well. However, teams that have played the Teabaggers have an unfair advantage stats-wise don't they?

Originally posted by King of Bling!
I'm not much for this as some teams go deep. Consequently the starters don't put up gaudy stats on "O" or on "D" as they spread things around pretty well. However, teams that have played the Teabaggers have an unfair advantage stats-wise don't they?

The EAST has 3 very weak teams that can be considered like CPU teams in CAROLINA, EAST TENNESSEE, and BROOKLYN

I'm confused on what you're asking King. All of the teams in the West play the Teabaggers at one time or another during the season. I know we (Thunder) spread things around and therefore probably won't get the pro-bowl votes anywhere really. I guess it's just up to people to take depth into account and judge how each player did when they WERE out on the field. I think I got it now lol.

voted. Nice job Hate, im not even gonna ask how long that took ya to do

Originally posted by Yendil
voted. Nice job Hate, im not even gonna ask how long that took ya to do

Too damned long lol

Originally posted by futuregm
Originally posted by King of Bling!

I'm not much for this as some teams go deep. Consequently the starters don't put up gaudy stats on "O" or on "D" as they spread things around pretty well. However, teams that have played the Teabaggers have an unfair advantage stats-wise don't they?

The EAST has 3 very weak teams that can be considered like CPU teams in CAROLINA, EAST TENNESSEE, and BROOKLYN

Brooklyn is much worse than the Teabaggers. Every team's players shoot up in the individual statistics after playing them.

voted nice work

Will probably fill this in sometime this week. Will be difficult though as more often I scout team sections, not individual players.

Originally posted by HATEMOBSTER
I went by depth chart Tree. For whatever reason, Carmody isn't on the depth chart and actually hasn't played in 4 weeks. He seems to be a pretty good QB even considering almost 1/2 his yards came against 2 teams.

yea, there was a post about that awhile back. for some reason, the owner of the team brought in a new QB, despite Carmody's high numbers...one of those weird things - Carmody helps lead an upset over Anchorage, and then the new owner brings in a new QB, and they've lost every game since...

I'd like to have the offensive and defensive voting done by the end of the season. Then maybe make an MVP voting type thing as well. The MVP one would be done before playoffs begin though. Like Real life it's based on the regular season. Even if your players normally don't come to the A7 board please encourage them to do so just so they can vote. Or post the link in your team thread if you would.

Thanks guys!

voted nice work

Originally posted by futuregm
Originally posted by King of Bling!

I'm not much for this as some teams go deep. Consequently the starters don't put up gaudy stats on "O" or on "D" as they spread things around pretty well. However, teams that have played the Teabaggers have an unfair advantage stats-wise don't they?

The EAST has 3 very weak teams that can be considered like CPU teams in CAROLINA, EAST TENNESSEE, and BROOKLYN

My point was, until all the teams have played one another, you can't get an accurate comparison due to SOS disparity. That's all.

Yeah I hear you on that King. I would've made it at the end of the season but I didn't want playoffs to be a factor at all. I guess just subtract those gut teams from the stats and see where they stand. It's really not a good measure of skill anyways.