User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Canadian A Leagues > Canadian A #5 > Predictions Week 9, West
Page:
 
yendorii
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Chriztian
Bah, sarcasm all around. There needs to be some sort of forum etiquette to let people know when you're being sarcastic.


There is: or
 
Zadith
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yendorii
Originally posted by Chriztian

Bah, sarcasm all around. There needs to be some sort of forum etiquette to let people know when you're being sarcastic.


There is: or


 
oldbaldone
offline
Link
 
All right, my bad. I promise not to do it again. ( maybe ) Still I really am on cruise control. I only have so much to work with .
 
wooden_bender
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by oldbaldone
All right, my bad. I promise not to do it again. ( maybe ) Still I really am on cruise control. I only have so much to work with .


Bah
 
Zadith
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by wooden_bender
Originally posted by oldbaldone

All right, my bad. I promise not to do it again. ( maybe ) Still I really am on cruise control. I only have so much to work with .


Bah


 
oldbaldone
offline
Link
 
All right the hour grows late so I'll let you not believe. I'll just say if I make the playoffs it won't be anything I did.
 
Link
 
Now our AI is fixed, but we lost some chemistry weeding out inactives. I hate inactives more than anything.
 
rackhound
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hangman Gallows
Now our AI is fixed, but we lost some chemistry weeding out inactives. I hate inactives more than anything.


yeah we have the same problem. last season I had 4 inactives this one over half my team was inactive. still working on that. my defense is pretty much taken care of now Im working on the offense.
 
Chriztian
offline
Link
 
7-1...much better this week.

Cincinnati Cardinals vs Edmonton Thunderchiefs: Great game here, that first quarter killed the Thunderchiefs.
Prediction: Cinci by 10.
Result: Cinci by 17

Manitoba Maulers vs Fort McMurray Mounted Police: No surprises here as the Maulers keep on rolling.
Prediction: Maulers by 31
Result: Maulers by 42

Vancouver Vikings vs Victoria Fish: I'm happy with 571 yards. Definitely found that flaw.
Predicion: Vikings by 21.
Result: Vikings by 28

North Bay Drift vs Manitoba Lions: So you didn't make the spread...Drift I think you guys need to take a long hard look at your D so that I look better here.
Prediction: Drift by 24.
Result: Drift by 4.

Canada Dragons vs Arroz Con Pollo: Los pollos sobrealimentados rojo-sol destruyeron un equipo de los dragones que había estado pareciendo bueno hasta este punto.
Prediction: Pollo by 17.
Result: Pollo by 38

Alberta Irukandji vs Fhockey.com Demos: Guess that Fhockey fixed their AI a bit better than Alberta did.
Prediction: Irukandji by 21.
Result: Fhockey by 3.

Moose Jaw Roughriders vs Saskatchewan Thrashers: Sorry, that actually means you guys lose by the spread, Dimmy.
Prediction: Roughriders by 172.
Result: Moose Jaw by 143.

Rancho Penasquitos Thunderbolts vs Laval Crusaders: CPU games don't interest me much.
Prediction: CPU Rapage
Result: Cpu Rapage
 
Primis
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Chriztian
Alberta Irukandji vs Fhockey.com Demos: Guess that Fhockey fixed their AI a bit better than Alberta did.
Prediction: Irukandji by 21.
Result: Fhockey by 3.


Yes we fixed the AI some... it also helps to get some of the "inactives" back into the swing of thing. I say "inactives" because even if they were logging in, not everyone was really paying attention at the start of the season. Been very frustrating this first part of the season.

Last edited Jan 19, 2009 20:02:25
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Primis
Originally posted by Chriztian

Alberta Irukandji vs Fhockey.com Demos: Guess that Fhockey fixed their AI a bit better than Alberta did.
Prediction: Irukandji by 21.
Result: Fhockey by 3.


Yes we fixed the AI some... it also helps to get some of the "inactives" back into the swing of thing. I say "inactives" because even if they were logging in, not everyone was really paying attention at the start of the season. Been very frustrating this first part of the season.



That was our problem too. Half the team went missing in action after our first loss and did not return. So now our problem is getting good replacements which is hard in mid season and it ruins the chemistry so much getting rid of the bums.
 
Absolut Zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Hangman Gallows
That was our problem too. Half the team went missing in action after our first loss and did not return. So now our problem is getting good replacements which is hard in mid season and it ruins the chemistry so much getting rid of the bums.


Speaking of chemistry, I didn't think it affected the games THAT much, but is that why 6YP is on a 3 game slide?
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Originally posted by Hangman Gallows

That was our problem too. Half the team went missing in action after our first loss and did not return. So now our problem is getting good replacements which is hard in mid season and it ruins the chemistry so much getting rid of the bums.


Speaking of chemistry, I didn't think it affected the games THAT much, but is that why 6YP is on a 3 game slide?


Yes it could have a lot to do with a losing streak.

It means players are not on the same page all the time. A line for example will miss a blitz and a sack will happen. Or one person runs the wrong play or throws are not accurate.

In my opinion it affects the game outcome way too much. Anything below 90 and its like a team in preseason with silly mistakes. You will see INTs, Fumbles, Penalties, Sacks, throws to covered people while wide open people are not passed to, running plays when you should be passing, ect...

It is like the 94 49ers. At the beginning of the season so many new people (Bryant Young, William Floyd, Norton Jr, Dion Sanders, and a few others) meant crazy stupid and down right ridiculously bad play. It was so bad that the 49ers took Young out of the game and benched him in the 3rd quarter. A few weeks later when they got used to playing with each other and knew their assignments they were unstoppable.
 
Aaron Everett
offline
Link
 
i think the max chemistry can affect performance is 10%, if its all the way down to 10. i think i read it in the Wiki, but your chemistry is just below ours, so maybe 1%. that was a very evenly matched game. we had to come up with a few big plays to bring it into overtime for the win. considering you were all over the QB in the first half, it could easily have gone your way. but a win is a win. we'll take it.
 
dimmy finster
offline
Link
 
thanks for the predictions! It appears Moose jaw is underperforming predictions, but
we hope to improve by next year.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.