Originally posted by vt_dolfan
I would also take a look at record of teams played against...for example...Vermont is 4-2, the combined record of the teams we have played against is...
16 wins / 20 loss
Atlanta
12 wins / 24 loss
Chesapeake
12 wins / 23 loss (one team actually had a tie)
So..who has played the harder schedule?
I applaud your efforts, and have no problem where you ranked Vermont.
I wasn't trying to call you out. Don't take it that way. I just used your team as a point of reference as to way player level is not a true indication of a power ranking. You did have the the #1 team on player level before the season. Player level means nothing and those of us like myself who was around last season can tell you that. A good game plan can always make up for level differences. That's the point I was trying to prove. I also don't see what streaks has to do with it either. What if you have a 5-1 team who just lost their first game so there streak is L1 and then you have a 3-3 team who won three in a row so their streak is W3. By factoring in just streak alone, it looks like the 3-3 team would come out stronger when that's really not the case.
I would put Indianapolis Gurupies in front of us because they squeaked on out against us. GLB has us second because there is a 3 way tie for second with the gurupies beating us then the losing to the other teams, so the next tie breaker is most points score which went to us.
Last edited May 8, 2008 06:30:40