Snowcones being 9th in Zeta makes that PR win. Playoffs here we come.
bighoppa67
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kevin71
Snowcones being 9th in Zeta makes that PR win. Playoffs here we come.
Especially after we just pitched a shutout against you and we're ranked 10th. WTH.
Snowcones being 9th in Zeta makes that PR win. Playoffs here we come.
Especially after we just pitched a shutout against you and we're ranked 10th. WTH.
Lurchito
offline
offline
i like how several slow build teams with guys not over lvl 10 are ranked above the warheads who average above a lvl 30
do a little research before posting these. its just silly otherwise.
do a little research before posting these. its just silly otherwise.
Kevin71
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lurchito
i like how several slow build teams with guys not over lvl 10 are ranked above the warheads who average above a lvl 30
do a little research before posting these. its just silly otherwise.
The BCS doesn't look at level. It is an unbiased computer. Hence why their rankings are the best.
i like how several slow build teams with guys not over lvl 10 are ranked above the warheads who average above a lvl 30
do a little research before posting these. its just silly otherwise.
The BCS doesn't look at level. It is an unbiased computer. Hence why their rankings are the best.
bighoppa67
offline
offline
It'll get better as the season goes on just like any other computer model. At least SOMEBODY is doing rankings for us.
Roger6363
offline
offline
Originally posted by bighoppa67
It'll get better as the season goes on just like any other computer model. At least SOMEBODY is doing rankings for us.
Thank you for the initiative
It'll get better as the season goes on just like any other computer model. At least SOMEBODY is doing rankings for us.
Thank you for the initiative
UclaBob
offline
offline
Overall:
1. Birmingham Bolts
2. Caspian Sea Dragons
3. The Saratov Swift Sharks
4. Chernobyl Nuclear Assault
5. Budapest Samurais
6. Macedonia Mountain Lions
7. Ukrainian Warheads
8. Louisville Bulls
9. Rome Colossus
10. London Wildcats
11. Heraklion Hoplites
12. Oslo Gunners
13. Prague Czechmates
14. Tonganoxie Shockers
15. Florida State Warheads
16. London Spartans
17. Fayette Mafia Crew
18. Berlin Devil Dogs
19. Bratislava Chaos
20. Detroit Cheetahs farm team
21. Budapest Coffee Mugs
22. Izmir Immortals
23. Crimea Sea Dragons
24. Alaskan Snowcones
25. WARSAW WARRIORS
26. Odessa Golden Horde
27. Gang Green
28. Wuerzburg Dynasty
29. Kiev Cossacks
30. Peterborough Preachers
31. Yukon Huskies
32. Hammerfest Vikings
Alpha Conference:
1. The Saratov Swift Sharks
2. Budapest Samurais
3. Louisville Bulls
4. London Wildcats
5. Heraklion Hoplites
6. Oslo Gunners
7. London Spartans
8. Fayette Mafia Crew
9. Berlin Devil Dogs
10. Bratislava Chaos
11. Detroit Cheetahs farm team
12. Budapest Coffee Mugs
13. Gang Green
14. Peterborough Preachers
15. Yukon Huskies
16. Hammerfest Vikings
Zeta Conference:
1. Birmingham Bolts
2. Caspian Sea Dragons
3. Chernobyl Nuclear Assault
4. Macedonia Mountain Lions
5. Ukrainian Warheads
6. Rome Colossus
7. Prague Czechmates
8. Tonganoxie Shockers
9. Florida State Warheads
10. Izmir Immortals
11. Crimea Sea Dragons
12. Alaskan Snowcones
13. WARSAW WARRIORS
14. Odessa Golden Horde
15. Wuerzburg Dynasty
16. Kiev Cossacks
Looks like some complaining after last week, let me reiterate that no actual thought goes into these rankings. I just take the league results and run the a computer program on them. Think of it like the GLB BCS, I agree that they aren't completely accurate right now...but I be trying to make further improvements as the season goes on.
To the poster who wanted me to look at the levels of players on his team, I content that that doesn't actually matter...I believe that looking at team results should be the best way to calculate team rankings (although I admit that there is some work that needs to be done in this area before I can say that these are accurate).
1. Birmingham Bolts
2. Caspian Sea Dragons
3. The Saratov Swift Sharks
4. Chernobyl Nuclear Assault
5. Budapest Samurais
6. Macedonia Mountain Lions
7. Ukrainian Warheads
8. Louisville Bulls
9. Rome Colossus
10. London Wildcats
11. Heraklion Hoplites
12. Oslo Gunners
13. Prague Czechmates
14. Tonganoxie Shockers
15. Florida State Warheads
16. London Spartans
17. Fayette Mafia Crew
18. Berlin Devil Dogs
19. Bratislava Chaos
20. Detroit Cheetahs farm team
21. Budapest Coffee Mugs
22. Izmir Immortals
23. Crimea Sea Dragons
24. Alaskan Snowcones
25. WARSAW WARRIORS
26. Odessa Golden Horde
27. Gang Green
28. Wuerzburg Dynasty
29. Kiev Cossacks
30. Peterborough Preachers
31. Yukon Huskies
32. Hammerfest Vikings
Alpha Conference:
1. The Saratov Swift Sharks
2. Budapest Samurais
3. Louisville Bulls
4. London Wildcats
5. Heraklion Hoplites
6. Oslo Gunners
7. London Spartans
8. Fayette Mafia Crew
9. Berlin Devil Dogs
10. Bratislava Chaos
11. Detroit Cheetahs farm team
12. Budapest Coffee Mugs
13. Gang Green
14. Peterborough Preachers
15. Yukon Huskies
16. Hammerfest Vikings
Zeta Conference:
1. Birmingham Bolts
2. Caspian Sea Dragons
3. Chernobyl Nuclear Assault
4. Macedonia Mountain Lions
5. Ukrainian Warheads
6. Rome Colossus
7. Prague Czechmates
8. Tonganoxie Shockers
9. Florida State Warheads
10. Izmir Immortals
11. Crimea Sea Dragons
12. Alaskan Snowcones
13. WARSAW WARRIORS
14. Odessa Golden Horde
15. Wuerzburg Dynasty
16. Kiev Cossacks
Looks like some complaining after last week, let me reiterate that no actual thought goes into these rankings. I just take the league results and run the a computer program on them. Think of it like the GLB BCS, I agree that they aren't completely accurate right now...but I be trying to make further improvements as the season goes on.
To the poster who wanted me to look at the levels of players on his team, I content that that doesn't actually matter...I believe that looking at team results should be the best way to calculate team rankings (although I admit that there is some work that needs to be done in this area before I can say that these are accurate).
bighoppa67
offline
offline
Heh...Yeah, Kiev keeps getting bumped lower every time we win. Granted we don't have any competition until game 6 against Izmir, but still... Kiev finishing 16th is impossible.
TrueBlueInMD
offline
offline
Hmmmm -- Ukraine wins game 1, is in the bottom half overall at #18, wins game 2 and drops to #22. Wins game 3, shoots up to #7 -- but, at 3-0, is still 3 spots below the now 1-2 team we just beat by 4 TD's.
Sounds to me like the computer program is impartial -- but wrong. Glad it's not going to be making the playoff seedings!
Sounds to me like the computer program is impartial -- but wrong. Glad it's not going to be making the playoff seedings!
imnott
offline
offline
Originally posted by TrueBlueInMD
Hmmmm -- Ukraine wins game 1, is in the bottom half overall at #18, wins game 2 and drops to #22. Wins game 3, shoots up to #7 -- but, at 3-0, is still 3 spots below the now 1-2 team we just beat by 4 TD's.
Sounds to me like the computer program is impartial -- but wrong. Glad it's not going to be making the playoff seedings!
Wouldn't mind going to Lousville....
Hmmmm -- Ukraine wins game 1, is in the bottom half overall at #18, wins game 2 and drops to #22. Wins game 3, shoots up to #7 -- but, at 3-0, is still 3 spots below the now 1-2 team we just beat by 4 TD's.
Sounds to me like the computer program is impartial -- but wrong. Glad it's not going to be making the playoff seedings!
Wouldn't mind going to Lousville....
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
