User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
pringles
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Robbnva
1. BC Lumber Company

2 - 32 - Who cares.


That's what you said last year also Better luck this time
 
Robbnva
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pringles
Originally posted by Robbnva

1. BC Lumber Company

2 - 32 - Who cares.


That's what you said last year also Better luck this time


yeah but last season we knew we were outmatched this season we are equal to most
 
Link
 
Originally posted by MrNomad
Originally posted by BoxwrencH
Originally posted by Robbnva



1. BC Lumber Company



2 - 32 - Who cares.




you must be referring to season 5 - ain't gonna happen for S6




Or season 7




cold!

*sigh*
Yes of course that was putting them down, not stating that its actually Season 7
Last edited Jan 25, 2009 08:37:03
 
cordes72
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gprofan
Originally posted by BoxwrencH

Originally posted by
MrNomad


Originally posted by
BoxwrencH




Originally posted by
Robbnva





1. BC Lumber Company



2 - 32 - Who cares.




you must be referring to season 5 - ain't gonna happen for S6



Or season 7




cold!

*sigh*
Yes of course that was putting them down, not stating that its actually Season 7


quote fail
 
Link
 
Damn....Uhh I mean...I...ehhh....
I was tricking you guys
 
CDZYO
offline
Link
 
Here's a preview of the power rankings as they stand after game 2:

Canada A #6 Top Ten
Rk___Team________________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Greenland Smokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .955 . . . 1.000 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
2..Yellowknife Raging Eskimos. . . . . . . . . . .915 . . . .500 . . . . 1.000 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Cobden Muskrats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Damage Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Unconventional Warfare. . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Moose Head Thundering Herd . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
7..Mont-Joli Mooseknuckles . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 . . . .500 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..St. John Saints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..British Columbia Lumber Company. . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
10(tie)..Ottawa Riders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1
10(tie)..Northside Juggernauts . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1

Formula: 50% win percentage + 33% O% + 25% OO%

I expect CENTRALIA to disagree strongly with these rankings. The Rat Ogres should be used to this by now.
 
MrNomad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Here's a preview of the power rankings as they stand after game 2:

Canada A #6 Top Ten
Rk___Team________________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Greenland Smokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .955 . . . 1.000 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
2..Yellowknife Raging Eskimos. . . . . . . . . . .915 . . . .500 . . . . 1.000 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Cobden Muskrats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Damage Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Unconventional Warfare. . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Moose Head Thundering Herd . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
7..Mont-Joli Mooseknuckles . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 . . . .500 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..St. John Saints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..British Columbia Lumber Company. . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
10(tie)..Ottawa Riders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1
10(tie)..Northside Juggernauts . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1

Formula: 50% win percentage + 33% O% + 25% OO%

I expect CENTRALIA to disagree strongly with these rankings. The Rat Ogres should be used to this by now.


Yep. Like I said last season we can only play our schedule.
 
Mr Sinister
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Here's a preview of the power rankings as they stand after game 2:

Canada A #6 Top Ten
Rk___Team________________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Greenland Smokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .955 . . . 1.000 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
2..Yellowknife Raging Eskimos. . . . . . . . . . .915 . . . .500 . . . . 1.000 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Cobden Muskrats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Damage Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Unconventional Warfare. . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Moose Head Thundering Herd . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
7..Mont-Joli Mooseknuckles . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 . . . .500 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..St. John Saints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..British Columbia Lumber Company. . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
10(tie)..Ottawa Riders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1
10(tie)..Northside Juggernauts . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1

Formula: 50% win percentage + 33% O% + 25% OO%

I expect CENTRALIA to disagree strongly with these rankings. The Rat Ogres should be used to this by now.


I'm willing to say that Yellowknife should be #8/9 at best right now. We are not playing our best yet, be it the defensive game planning, or the offensive. Give us time, and we should be able to fix that, I hope.
 
sickie8305
offline
Link
 
NO Comment
 
Robbnva
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Here's a preview of the power rankings as they stand after game 2:

Canada A #6 Top Ten
Rk___Team________________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Greenland Smokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .955 . . . 1.000 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
2..Yellowknife Raging Eskimos. . . . . . . . . . .915 . . . .500 . . . . 1.000 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Cobden Muskrats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Damage Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Unconventional Warfare. . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Moose Head Thundering Herd . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
7..Mont-Joli Mooseknuckles . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 . . . .500 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..St. John Saints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..British Columbia Lumber Company. . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
10(tie)..Ottawa Riders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1
10(tie)..Northside Juggernauts . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1

Formula: 50% win percentage + 33% O% + 25% OO%

I expect CENTRALIA to disagree strongly with these rankings. The Rat Ogres should be used to this by now.


there are a couple of other teams who would disagree strongly with these rankings
 
Thorad
offline
Link
 
There is nothing to disagree with guys at all. His formula is pretty basic and shown. The rankings will be more accurate as the season goes on. The teams that had overly easy wins will be ranked higher than they should and teams that had to play tough teams and fight for the wins will be lower than the should. Give it 2-3 more games to balance out.
 
MrNomad
offline
Link
 
It's not a big deal. Even going 16-0 last season the Rat Ogres were still not rated the #1 team. That's what CD was talking about. The entire season last season the Rat Ogres were never respected by the formula.
 
Thorad
offline
Link
 
My QB played them in the 2nd round last year. I know what the Rat Ogres can do
 
cheesestring
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Here's a preview of the power rankings as they stand after game 2:

Canada A #6 Top Ten
Rk___Team________________________RPI____O%____OO%__W__L__
1..Greenland Smokers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .955 . . . 1.000 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
2..Yellowknife Raging Eskimos. . . . . . . . . . .915 . . . .500 . . . . 1.000 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Cobden Muskrats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Damage Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Unconventional Warfare. . . . . . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
3(tie)..Moose Head Thundering Herd . . . . . .853 . . . .500 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
7..Mont-Joli Mooseknuckles . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 . . . .500 . . . . .500 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..St. John Saints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
8(tie)..British Columbia Lumber Company. . .688 . . . .000 . . . . .750 . . . . 2 . . 0
10(tie)..Ottawa Riders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1
10(tie)..Northside Juggernauts . . . . . . . . . . . .643 . . . 1.000 . . . . .250 . . . . 1 . . 1

Formula: 50% win percentage + 33% O% + 25% OO%

I expect CENTRALIA to disagree strongly with these rankings. The Rat Ogres should be used to this by now.


I strongly disagree with these ranking as well. Anything that puts us on top and as the "team to beat" only makes Tremor Rush angry. You wouldn't like him when he's angry.
 
CDZYO
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MrNomad
It's not a big deal. Even going 16-0 last season the Rat Ogres were still not rated the #1 team. That's what CD was talking about. The entire season last season the Rat Ogres were never respected by the formula.


This.

Truth be told, the stock RPI formula that comes with the spreadsheet kept sticking weird teams at the top, so I adjusted the formula a couple of times during the season in an attempt to find a better metric. The Rat Ogres were a big reason for changing the formula.

It's also a preview of how the rankings will look -- after two games, there's not much to go on. I won't post an "official" version until after game 4.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.