Originally posted by jmarter
Originally posted by Sigmaforce
yeah, Bort scaled it back a lot after the first batch of sims. We got our game with Georgetown re-simmed to see how it would go without it, there were 44 broken tackles by our backs in that game, compared to 15 or whatever the re-sim was. We also got a few cheap sacks from the rollout thing
Had I only known that was an option we might be in AAA right now.
lol
Don't put too much stock into us being shut out. In a real game, our playcalls will be much different. What you can take away from the Hakone/Georgetown game, however, is not that Georgetown was previously ranked too high, but rather that Hakone was ranked too low.
In a real game, we would give them a run. They're the better team, but they would not beat us 21-0. 21-10? Sure. 17-7? Sure.
I was calling about half "real" plays, and half "test" plays that scrimmage. Either way, even versus the "real" plays, they seriously contained our rushing game. Most of the testing was on passes.
Originally posted by Sigmaforce
yeah, Bort scaled it back a lot after the first batch of sims. We got our game with Georgetown re-simmed to see how it would go without it, there were 44 broken tackles by our backs in that game, compared to 15 or whatever the re-sim was. We also got a few cheap sacks from the rollout thing
Had I only known that was an option we might be in AAA right now.
lol
Don't put too much stock into us being shut out. In a real game, our playcalls will be much different. What you can take away from the Hakone/Georgetown game, however, is not that Georgetown was previously ranked too high, but rather that Hakone was ranked too low.
In a real game, we would give them a run. They're the better team, but they would not beat us 21-0. 21-10? Sure. 17-7? Sure.
I was calling about half "real" plays, and half "test" plays that scrimmage. Either way, even versus the "real" plays, they seriously contained our rushing game. Most of the testing was on passes.
