tebow
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
actually i couldn't give two shits about college football, and who plays who in the bcs game.
its a flawed system, and whoever comes out the "champion" probably doesn't deserve it. half the teams that play in the game don't deserve to be there, ala ohio state. last "great" bcs game was usc/texas with v. young
i just brought up the beaver comment to rile up you usc homers
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
actually i couldn't give two shits about college football, and who plays who in the bcs game.
its a flawed system, and whoever comes out the "champion" probably doesn't deserve it. half the teams that play in the game don't deserve to be there, ala ohio state. last "great" bcs game was usc/texas with v. young
i just brought up the beaver comment to rile up you usc homers
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
actually i couldn't give two shits about college football, and who plays who in the bcs game.
its a flawed system, and whoever comes out the "champion" probably doesn't deserve it. half the teams that play in the game don't deserve to be there, ala ohio state. last "great" bcs game was usc/texas with v. young
i just brought up the beaver comment to rile up you usc homers
If you couldn't give 2 shits about it than you wouldn't have brought it up.
Since you brought it up don't back down like a little bitch. If you having something to say that is worth anything say it, if not then shut your hoe ass up.
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
tell that one to oregon st.
You're an idiot obviously.
If you're willing to go that far, I guess you're willing to say Utah and Boise State should play in the championship game since they're both undefeated.
If you want to take this any further go ahead, you will lose the argument.
actually i couldn't give two shits about college football, and who plays who in the bcs game.
its a flawed system, and whoever comes out the "champion" probably doesn't deserve it. half the teams that play in the game don't deserve to be there, ala ohio state. last "great" bcs game was usc/texas with v. young
i just brought up the beaver comment to rile up you usc homers
If you couldn't give 2 shits about it than you wouldn't have brought it up.
Since you brought it up don't back down like a little bitch. If you having something to say that is worth anything say it, if not then shut your hoe ass up.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
that and the money involved in the bowl games the setup will never change. the money involved is too great, and instead of switching to a different format to determine the true #1 national champion the conferences will prefer the 40 bowls or whatever we have now so they can rake in their $$$
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
Last edited Dec 18, 2008 20:32:06
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
that and the money involved in the bowl games the setup will never change. the money involved is too great, and instead of switching to a different format to determine the true #1 national champion the conferences will prefer the 40 bowls or whatever we have now so they can rake in their $$$
What you just said makes entirely no sense.
Thanks for proving my point, you have no clue what you're talking about.
that and the money involved in the bowl games the setup will never change. the money involved is too great, and instead of switching to a different format to determine the true #1 national champion the conferences will prefer the 40 bowls or whatever we have now so they can rake in their $$$
What you just said makes entirely no sense.
Thanks for proving my point, you have no clue what you're talking about.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
why would a school not want to play a game and make 17 million in the process. do you understand that aspect of the game?
http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2007/11/30/bcs-game-means-big-money-big-12/
http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2007/11/30/bcs-game-means-big-money-big-12/
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
I never said they deserve to play for the national championship. All I stated was they would be favored over whoever they fucking played.
BTW, even if I did want to go that far as why they deserved it, check out the schedules of who played who and you would understand.
Crawl back in your little hole and shut the fuck up bitch.
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
I never said they deserve to play for the national championship. All I stated was they would be favored over whoever they fucking played.
BTW, even if I did want to go that far as why they deserved it, check out the schedules of who played who and you would understand.
Crawl back in your little hole and shut the fuck up bitch.
StoutOne
offline
offline
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
why would a school not want to play a game and make 17 million in the process. do you understand that aspect of the game?
http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2007/11/30/bcs-game-means-big-money-big-12/
I understand that none of these teams play anybody worth a shit.
Compare schedules and you would understand how this shit works.
why would a school not want to play a game and make 17 million in the process. do you understand that aspect of the game?
http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2007/11/30/bcs-game-means-big-money-big-12/
I understand that none of these teams play anybody worth a shit.
Compare schedules and you would understand how this shit works.
onlyrockerfan
offline
offline
Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
I never said they deserve to play for the national championship. All I stated was they would be favored over whoever they fucking played.
BTW, even if I did want to go that far as why they deserved it, check out the schedules of who played who and you would understand.
Crawl back in your little hole and shut the fuck up bitch.
usc's only quality win was over ohio state, and they lost to oregon state
florida beat alabama, lsu, georgia and fsu
and oklahoma beat ttu, oksu, mizzou and lost to texas
but you're getting awfully defensive, when i asked you a simple question.....
they've had tougher schedules and usc hasn't had that tough of a schedule, its why they deserve to be in over usc....had usc run the table and gone undefeated then yes they should be in the title game over either oklahoma or florida
Originally posted by onlyrockerfan
and tell me why usc deserves to play for the national championship. what have they done to deserve playing there over florida or oklahoma? is it because their pac 10 schedule is tougher than the big12 or SEC?
I never said they deserve to play for the national championship. All I stated was they would be favored over whoever they fucking played.
BTW, even if I did want to go that far as why they deserved it, check out the schedules of who played who and you would understand.
Crawl back in your little hole and shut the fuck up bitch.
usc's only quality win was over ohio state, and they lost to oregon state
florida beat alabama, lsu, georgia and fsu
and oklahoma beat ttu, oksu, mizzou and lost to texas
but you're getting awfully defensive, when i asked you a simple question.....
they've had tougher schedules and usc hasn't had that tough of a schedule, its why they deserve to be in over usc....had usc run the table and gone undefeated then yes they should be in the title game over either oklahoma or florida
Last edited Dec 18, 2008 20:41:34
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.