Warrior General Games

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=234827&pbp_id=11049322

Normally our WR Screen triggers more often, it only got into this game
once...and got a TD.

You guys played well and combined with the more random elements of my
offense choosing some less efficient plays it definitely knocked us out.

The WR Screen played a big part for you guys in extending your offensive
drives and keeping my defense on the field. Not to mention your defense
was great.

I'm terrible at math, but here's what your WR Screen yielded
appproximately:
12/23 passing attempts were WR Screens. All passing TD's were the WR Screen
You completed 7 passes which were not WR Screens.
All passing TD's were the WR Screen
WR Screen: 12 Attempts, 151 yards, 4 TD's.
Of your 49 points, the WR Screen scored 28 directly.
All but one the Light's scoring drives include a WR Screen.

I had worked up a zone defense to play against the Screen and it triggered
just about every time you guys called the play. Sadly it failed miserably.

Cheers,
Sahoj

Your screen was on the 8 yard line w/ 3 defenders about to make a tackle. Your reasonings and excuses are terrible, like your math.

Those 3 defenders were behind the guy, he would've been gone
if he had to go 8 yards or 80.

hey now. Be nice Fish

If he wants to assume we will run that Defensive Scheme 100% of the time, 8 yard line or no, let him. No biggee.

He's right you know.

We really suck. The ONLY reason we won is because we cheated and abused a trick play that we scouted him enough on to learn that he hadn't figured out how to stop yet. That's the ONLY reason we gained 250 yards on the ground.

His team is really waaaay better then us and he has a right to be upset we 'cheated' with a trick play. We will be lucky to make it past the first round of playoffs anyway, as poor a job we do scouting and making GP's.

Originally posted by Sahoj
Those 3 defenders were behind the guy, he would've been gone
if he had to go 8 yards or 80.


riiight. just like on this play, while behind the FS and further away from the defender:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=234827&pbp_id=11048283

next?

Originally posted by Den

We really suck. The ONLY reason we won is because we cheated and abused a trick play that we scouted him enough on to learn that he hadn't figured out how to stop yet. That's the ONLY reason we gained 250 yards on the ground.

His team is really waaaay better then us and he has a right to be upset we 'cheated' with a trick play. We will be lucky to make it past the first round of playoffs anyway, as poor a job we do scouting and making GP's.

You guys are like abused, shelter wives. I didn't say anything of
the sort.

Cheers,
Sahoj

Originally posted by Den
hey now. Be nice Fish

If he wants to assume we will run that Defensive Scheme 100% of the time, 8 yard line or no, let him. No biggee.

He's right you know.

We really suck. The ONLY reason we won is because we cheated and abused a trick play that we scouted him enough on to learn that he hadn't figured out how to stop yet. That's the ONLY reason we gained 250 yards on the ground.

His team is really waaaay better then us and he has a right to be upset we 'cheated' with a trick play. We will be lucky to make it past the first round of playoffs anyway, as poor a job we do scouting and making GP's.

Awesome

Originally posted by Sahoj
Originally posted by Den


We really suck. The ONLY reason we won is because we cheated and abused a trick play that we scouted him enough on to learn that he hadn't figured out how to stop yet. That's the ONLY reason we gained 250 yards on the ground.

His team is really waaaay better then us and he has a right to be upset we 'cheated' with a trick play. We will be lucky to make it past the first round of playoffs anyway, as poor a job we do scouting and making GP's.

You guys are like abused, shelter wives.

What?? Sarcasm = abused shelter wives? I must be slow today....I don't get the connection.


Originally posted by Sahoj

I didn't say anything of
the sort.

Cheers,
Sahoj

I beg to differ....

Originally posted by Sahoj
Ahahaha, another game blown to WR screens.
It was certainly implied...

and this...
Originally posted by sahoj
I'm terrible at math, but here's what your WR Screen yielded
appproximately:
12/23 passing attempts were WR Screens. All passing TD's were the WR Screen
You completed 7 passes which were not WR Screens.
All passing TD's were the WR Screen
WR Screen: 12 Attempts, 151 yards, 4 TD's.
Of your 49 points, the WR Screen scored 28 directly.
All but one the Light's scoring drives include a WR Screen.

Is an awful lot of work to go thru if not singling out a single play to attribute your loss too...

Which comes back to my point!

Originally posted by Polorl69
you turned into a WHINY LITTLE BITCH

I wish I had less time. Not a lot to do at work today.

Definitely a shame to be spending down time trading insults with
you folk.

Insults?

If you feel I have insulted you in any way, please point it out to me.

If however you feel disagreeing with you, using rhetoric to make a point, or using your own words to prove you wrong are in any way "Insults"...

Then perhaps we are using different dictionaries? Is English your native language?

I find it funny....

Sahoj has done nothing but bitch about the WR screen on this board and on the main board.

One thing is certain.... he doesn't use it and can't stop it because his players do not have the builds necessary.

Do you know what Singapore said about the WR screen... absolutely nothing. They got beat by it, they congratulated us and now they will try to stop it.

Sahoj your frustration in this play is really coming of whiny as Polorl has stated..

I'm glad you're amused. If you want to call me 'Whiny', it's fine.

My basic response will be to simply consider you ignorant. Sometimes
I'll be happy enough to post such a response unless I'm busy with
something better.

If you're unable to understand that a play has had a pivotal role
in your team's performance during a game when I kindly point it
out to you, you're also probably an idiot.

I'll probably be bitching about the play for the rest of the season,
whether you approve of it or not.

Cheers,
Sahoj

Originally posted by Sahoj
I'm glad you're amused. If you want to call me 'Whiny', it's fine.

My basic response will be to simply consider you ignorant. Sometimes
I'll be happy enough to post such a response unless I'm busy with
something better.

If you're unable to understand that a play has had a pivotal role
in your team's performance during a game when I kindly point it
out to you, you're also probably an idiot.

I'll probably be bitching about the play for the rest of the season,
whether you approve of it or not.

Cheers,
Sahoj


I don't know you from a bag of dicks, you could be a cool guy in real life. But you come off as a pompous ass.

can't we just say good game and be done with it?