Warrior General Games

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by dilpete

Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

Originally posted by ColaCock
Originally posted by cannons call

Originally posted by dilpete


Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

ummmm it might be because he didn't play in the game. Check the stat sheet again buddy boy.

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by ColaCock

Originally posted by cannons call


Originally posted by dilpete



Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

ummmm it might be because he didn't play in the game. Check the stat sheet again buddy boy.

+10000000000

He is just talking cuz one his team's players is now ahead of Tanner... And he is scared that guy wont keep his spot.

Originally posted by ColaCock
Originally posted by cannons call

Originally posted by dilpete


Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

haha you kinda missed the entire point of the post I guess. He asked that we bench him since it was a CPU team.

I'll take 100 xp over trying to look like I am too noble to rack up stats on a cpu team any day.

Originally posted by ColaCock
Originally posted by cannons call

Originally posted by dilpete


Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

You really think Tanner would get zero sacks against a CPU team? Come on now.

Originally posted by nfratami
I'll take 100 xp over trying to look like I am too noble to rack up stats on a cpu team any day.

The truth is we had a little depth chart mess up for that game and he was left off. 100% not his fault

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by nfratami

I'll take 100 xp over trying to look like I am too noble to rack up stats on a cpu team any day.

The truth is we had a little depth chart mess up for that game and he was left off. 100% not his fault

lol

Originally posted by bubbajwp
Originally posted by MarlinsDynasty

FFA!

Who?

EEEEELLLLLLLLLLIIIITTTTTEEEEEEEE!

Originally posted by MarlinsDynasty
Originally posted by bubbajwp

Originally posted by MarlinsDynasty


FFA!

Who?

EEEEELLLLLLLLLLIIIITTTTTEEEEEEEE!

Who?

Originally posted by cannons call
Originally posted by ColaCock

Originally posted by cannons call


Originally posted by dilpete



Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

ummmm it might be because he didn't play in the game. Check the stat sheet again buddy boy.

My bad, that isn't what I understood from reading the first post.

Originally posted by Marcus66Aurelius
Originally posted by cannons call

Originally posted by ColaCock


Originally posted by cannons call



Originally posted by dilpete




Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

ummmm it might be because he didn't play in the game. Check the stat sheet again buddy boy.

+10000000000

He is just talking cuz one his team's players is now ahead of Tanner... And he is scared that guy wont keep his spot.

Is NOW ahead of Tanner? I don't believe Tanner has ever been on an equal statistical level. I wasn't trying to start a war...just stating the facts and wanting to give a little credit to the players in the league's supposed 'stepchild' of a conference.

Originally posted by ColaCock
Originally posted by Marcus66Aurelius

Originally posted by cannons call


Originally posted by ColaCock



Originally posted by cannons call




Originally posted by dilpete





Or the worst offensive lines in the league

or having three CPU teams to beat up on



how can you use that excuse when Tanner just played a CPU team and recorded zero sacks? Kind of works against your argument.

ummmm it might be because he didn't play in the game. Check the stat sheet again buddy boy.

+10000000000

He is just talking cuz one his team's players is now ahead of Tanner... And he is scared that guy wont keep his spot.

Is NOW ahead of Tanner? I don't believe Tanner has ever been on an equal statistical level. I wasn't trying to start a war...just stating the facts and wanting to give a little credit to the players in the league's supposed 'stepchild' of a conference.



Actually Tanner had a higher sack total last year and if it wasn't for the depth chart screw up he would probably be ahead of him this year as well

Seriously though the bottom line is they are both really great players and comparing players in different conferences is really pretty pointless.

I think they should have babies and they should join storm

Originally posted by UK Back
I think they should have babies and they should join storm

+ 1 billion