Originally posted by Brian the Stunt Bum
The ranking system bases it on what you are supposed to do against teams and how you perform against expectations. IE if a team has given up an average of 40 points and scored 20 and you beat them 30 to 20 then you only score 75% of what you are supposed to and hold teams to 100% of what you're expect to. This means the sheet does not like you. It thinks you are going to lose against teams that out perform thing. That means teams that are pass heavy, and thus run up scores more, tend to be more strongly favored in the spreadsheet than others.
Which is a real statement to how a team like Ohio Valley is playing for them to be ranked so high despite being a running team.
The thing is the Hollows have scored more pts and given up less than the teams average most of the time. I still don't understand how it projects us not to win another game, that is just unrealistic.
The ranking system bases it on what you are supposed to do against teams and how you perform against expectations. IE if a team has given up an average of 40 points and scored 20 and you beat them 30 to 20 then you only score 75% of what you are supposed to and hold teams to 100% of what you're expect to. This means the sheet does not like you. It thinks you are going to lose against teams that out perform thing. That means teams that are pass heavy, and thus run up scores more, tend to be more strongly favored in the spreadsheet than others.
Which is a real statement to how a team like Ohio Valley is playing for them to be ranked so high despite being a running team.
The thing is the Hollows have scored more pts and given up less than the teams average most of the time. I still don't understand how it projects us not to win another game, that is just unrealistic.
